<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Mashable - The Social Media Guide - Latest Comments in You Might Not Love the New Facebook, But Brands Should</title><link>http://mashable.disqus.com/</link><description>Internet and Technology News - Mashable is the world’s largest blog focused exclusively on Web 2.0 and Social Networking news. With more than 5 million monthly pageviews, Mashable is the most prolific blog reviewing new Web sites and services, publishing breaking news on what’s new on the web.</description><atom:link href="https://mashable.disqus.com/you_might_not_love_the_new_facebook_but_brands_should/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 06:10:13 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: You Might Not Love the New Facebook, But Brands Should</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/03/19/new-facebook-brands/#comment-17109458</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I love the new look.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Photo Editing Expert</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 06:10:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: You Might Not Love the New Facebook, But Brands Should</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/03/19/new-facebook-brands/#comment-8288869</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I kinda like this addition&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Tubtoes</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 02:17:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: You Might Not Love the New Facebook, But Brands Should</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/03/19/new-facebook-brands/#comment-7998511</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Does Facebook only allow Twitter feeds for personal accounts? How can businesses' Twitter posts feed into their business FB profile?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">susan.diana.harris</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 02:11:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: You Might Not Love the New Facebook, But Brands Should</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/03/19/new-facebook-brands/#comment-7784430</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Not sure about gaining extra traffic to pages because of the redesign. At SEGA our page had a record month during February, then as the pages were redesigned we saw drop offs by as much as 50%. The numbers clearly weren't good for us. However, we are getting used to the new features, and think in the long term we will see a big improvement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">James Carson</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2009 04:46:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: You Might Not Love the New Facebook, But Brands Should</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/03/19/new-facebook-brands/#comment-7676764</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Last day to save $ 400 You can have an e-commerce system&lt;br&gt;selling almost limitless items, making 7 % over and over on each.&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://Goldenman.localadlink.net" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="Goldenman.localadlink.net"&gt;Goldenman.localadlink.net&lt;/a&gt; &lt;br&gt; Do you need to advertise to 50 target zip codes, low cost monthly&lt;br&gt; If you pay one year in advance, you can receive 15 % discount &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Tom Simmons</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 11:01:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: You Might Not Love the New Facebook, But Brands Should</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/03/19/new-facebook-brands/#comment-7404943</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I love the New Facbook Look!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt; Both from a marketing perspective and as an individual.&lt;br&gt;It's cleaner. The old Facebook looked choppy, almost like a cheap script you could buy&lt;br&gt;off of hotscripts.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I hope they tweek the new look even more.&lt;br&gt;There are some cool new feature now that they didn't have before.&lt;br&gt;I think any users who  complain, are just doing so out of anger that they now have to get used to something new, just when they figured out how to use the old Facebook.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">EmailBusiness</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 21 Mar 2009 18:21:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: You Might Not Love the New Facebook, But Brands Should</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/03/19/new-facebook-brands/#comment-7400570</link><description>&lt;p&gt;That sounds like the "sellers aside though" that's sent eBay into its downward spiral! &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Joyful Alternative</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 21 Mar 2009 13:32:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: You Might Not Love the New Facebook, But Brands Should</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/03/19/new-facebook-brands/#comment-7400041</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Fortunately there are numerous Greasemonkey scripts for Firefox that let you hack out all the new garbage that comes through now on the homepage. For example: Facebook Purity &lt;a href="http://userscripts.org/scripts/show/44459" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://userscripts.org/scripts/show/44459"&gt;http://userscripts.org/scri...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">willswords</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 21 Mar 2009 12:54:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: You Might Not Love the New Facebook, But Brands Should</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/03/19/new-facebook-brands/#comment-7399008</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Ditto, Julie.  I don't care about the streaming feed, I care about a preponderonce of "little" things that changed for users that aren't so good.  I go to my FB less now and am less active in general on it which means I'm not clicking through to anyone's pages and I'm not inviting any new friends.  I enlisted about a fourth of my friends from the land of "what's Facebook?" before the redo, but since I'm contemplating other venues for this type of socializing, it'd be a waste of time to do that now. I DO like how the pages are done, but I just don't want to spend as much time on FB anymore.  &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">kate</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 21 Mar 2009 11:31:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: You Might Not Love the New Facebook, But Brands Should</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/03/19/new-facebook-brands/#comment-7389564</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Shame they had to change it.. at least give people the option you know..?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">CraigS</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 23:09:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: You Might Not Love the New Facebook, But Brands Should</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/03/19/new-facebook-brands/#comment-7377598</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Its not a site for brands, its for people who want to connect.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">King Khan</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 12:57:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: You Might Not Love the New Facebook, But Brands Should</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/03/19/new-facebook-brands/#comment-7377143</link><description>&lt;p&gt;get selective twitter app for fb.  You can post your tweets by adding #fb at the end.  &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">thatkidrich</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 12:39:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: You Might Not Love the New Facebook, But Brands Should</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/03/19/new-facebook-brands/#comment-7376231</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Facebook is a great feature. Its branding is very simple yet iconic, as you can tell what something is purely by associating a colour scheme, layout or type font.&lt;br&gt;A little SEO tip is to set up facebook accounts for all staff, and get them to join other groups and start placing back links on other groups on facebook, get talking to people and people will start clicking the links to leave blogs, etc on your page, or site.  It does work.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">jamesm1234</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 12:21:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: You Might Not Love the New Facebook, But Brands Should</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/03/19/new-facebook-brands/#comment-7374964</link><description>&lt;p&gt;you've noted one facet of the benefit provided by the new facebook.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;i think, however, there's a lot more benefit than you are noting.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;the internet is great for spreading ideas and now, with the new facebook, new ideas can spread about faster than they ever could. sure, there's money in it, but i'm grateful for that because if there wasn't, we wouldn't be able to spread ideas so fast.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;i think it's great.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">tobo</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 11:53:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: You Might Not Love the New Facebook, But Brands Should</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/03/19/new-facebook-brands/#comment-7368977</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Twitter with it's addition of sponsored streams will leave a lot of people in the dust Faceook seems to take direction from old media types-&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">marshal sandler</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 05:13:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: You Might Not Love the New Facebook, But Brands Should</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/03/19/new-facebook-brands/#comment-7368884</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I really think Facebook is a playground not a medium to advertise, Twitter will now be creating custom streams-this will be a killer approach to marketing remember also the people who have invested in Twitter understand Internet marketing Facebook is sort an off shoot of old media  filled with distracting applications  that are cute bu have not monetised Face book&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">marshal sandler</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 05:02:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: You Might Not Love the New Facebook, But Brands Should</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/03/19/new-facebook-brands/#comment-7367357</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I will block any page that I become a fan of that spams my newsfeed. I will make a point of NOT clicking on any fan spam - no matter how enticing...&lt;br&gt;Social media is about choice, and your right to exercise it...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Lisa</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 02:05:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: You Might Not Love the New Facebook, But Brands Should</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/03/19/new-facebook-brands/#comment-7357372</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Facebook Pages have a much lower barrier to entry than building out your own app with FB Connect.  Hence, I think we'll see a lot more Pages than Connect apps, though, certainly a combo of them would create quite the loop in terms of generating interaction on FB. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Adam Ostrow</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 17:09:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: You Might Not Love the New Facebook, But Brands Should</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/03/19/new-facebook-brands/#comment-7357084</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Do you think that folks will start to drive people to pages OUTSIDE facebook that are enabled with FB Connect?  I think the idea of streams is novel, but is it really the best thing for a brand to have their creative capacity limited by the functionality of a fan page.  Don't have the answer, but am curious...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">hooman</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 16:57:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: You Might Not Love the New Facebook, But Brands Should</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/03/19/new-facebook-brands/#comment-7357027</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I follow Mashable (and some of its writers) on Twitter and therefore don't follow Mashable on Facebook. What would be the point of doing both? I'd assume that people who use both sites will probably use Facebook to stay in touch with peripheral friends and use Twitter to follow brands/news sites. There are lots of people on FB but not Twitter and so they will continue to get their brand info from Facebook, I guess. That's just my opinion.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;As for Facebook changes. C'mon people. Give it another few weeks and you won't even remember what it was like before. I've stopped using FB as much, but that's not because of the re-design. It's because my friends' updates are usually lame and boring. I prefer following experts in their field on Twitter. Kinda ironic.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Wisewinston</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 16:54:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: You Might Not Love the New Facebook, But Brands Should</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/03/19/new-facebook-brands/#comment-7356779</link><description>&lt;p&gt;As a page admin, I share your frustration (see my comment further down).  If you haven't already, definitely make sure you report this bug to facebook so that they make this priority.  There's a discussion thread and links to the bug report here: &lt;a href="http://www.facebook.com/topic.php?uid=10381469571&amp;amp;topic=8192" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.facebook.com/topic.php?uid=10381469571&amp;amp;topic=8192"&gt;http://www.facebook.com/top...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Andy</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 16:45:19 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: You Might Not Love the New Facebook, But Brands Should</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/03/19/new-facebook-brands/#comment-7356492</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Exactly. So you get more traffic to your facebook page from pre-existing users. But the fact that "Jane doe joined mashable" no longer appears in the news feed really hinders the ability for the brand to be spread outside its present-day fans.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">kittenheel</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 16:34:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: You Might Not Love the New Facebook, But Brands Should</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/03/19/new-facebook-brands/#comment-7355868</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I like the new facebook!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Facebook User</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 16:10:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: You Might Not Love the New Facebook, But Brands Should</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/03/19/new-facebook-brands/#comment-7355544</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Obviously a great idea in terms of bringing in revenue. Business will definitely love this, and they are the ones that pay for different services on Facebook, not the more than 60 million users.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Still, I can't stand the change. I go on Facebook now expecting it to look and function like Twitter and it's just so cluttered. When I want to promote something on either of these sites I just create a listing on &lt;a href="http://ilist.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://ilist.com"&gt;http://ilist.com&lt;/a&gt; and iList does it for me. It's just a frustrating mess on the Facebook homepage, but the uprising won't do much to slow down the so-so decision making of this social media giant.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mike</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 15:57:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: You Might Not Love the New Facebook, But Brands Should</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/03/19/new-facebook-brands/#comment-7355038</link><description>&lt;p&gt;It's not that much as the author says. It's a good idea through a business perspective but they should have set up filters so as not to be flooded with News from things we actually don't care. And also, the loss of knowing our friends became fan from other pages make them lose the virality.&lt;br&gt;As people say, It's easy to click the X button and so far I have been hiding all News from Pages. Facebook is for friends, I don't think people want to hear about business and other stuff. I hope they realize this and make a couple of filters so as we can at least manage how much we want from this pages in our feed.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Marito</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 15:37:50 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>