<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Mashable - The Social Media Guide - Latest Comments in Would You Pay for a Facebook Vanity URL?</title><link>http://mashable.disqus.com/</link><description>Internet and Technology News - Mashable is the world’s largest blog focused exclusively on Web 2.0 and Social Networking news. With more than 5 million monthly pageviews, Mashable is the most prolific blog reviewing new Web sites and services, publishing breaking news on what’s new on the web.</description><atom:link href="https://mashable.disqus.com/would_you_pay_for_a_facebook_vanity_url/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2009 18:07:59 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Would You Pay for a Facebook Vanity URL?</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/04/23/facebook-vanity-url/#comment-15032240</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Not for my personal account, but I would certainly consider buying a memorable one for some of my businesses.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Lydia Eventa</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2009 18:07:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Would You Pay for a Facebook Vanity URL?</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/04/23/facebook-vanity-url/#comment-11773354</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Nah, I wouldn't pay for my personal one, it already shows up easy enough in searches, but for my business &lt;a href="http://insphyreperformance.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://insphyreperformance.com"&gt;http://insphyreperformance.com&lt;/a&gt; I maybe would of paid for &lt;a href="http://facebook.com/insphyre" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="facebook.com/insphyre"&gt;facebook.com/insphyre&lt;/a&gt; but I already got it so I wouldn't obviously pay at this point.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anthony Proulx</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 09:54:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Would You Pay for a Facebook Vanity URL?</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/04/23/facebook-vanity-url/#comment-11773344</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Nah, I wouldn't pay for my personal one, it already shows up easy enough in searches, but for my business &lt;a href="http://insphyreperformance.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://insphyreperformance.com"&gt;http://insphyreperformance.com&lt;/a&gt; I maybe would of paid for &lt;a href="http://facebook.com/insphyre" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="facebook.com/insphyre"&gt;facebook.com/insphyre&lt;/a&gt; but I already got it so I wouldn't obviously pay at this point.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anthony Proulx</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 09:54:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Would You Pay for a Facebook Vanity URL?</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/04/23/facebook-vanity-url/#comment-11773254</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Nah, I wouldn't pay for my personal one, it already shows up easy enough in searches, but for my business &lt;a href="http://insphyreperformance.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://insphyreperformance.com"&gt;http://insphyreperformance.com&lt;/a&gt; I maybe would of paid for &lt;a href="http://facebook.com/insphyre" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="facebook.com/insphyre"&gt;facebook.com/insphyre&lt;/a&gt; but I already got it so I wouldn't obviously pay at this point.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anthony Proulx</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 09:50:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Would You Pay for a Facebook Vanity URL?</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/04/23/facebook-vanity-url/#comment-10844020</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Not a chance. Sorry, facebook. You're not getting my cash just for url's&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">CarlosX360</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2009 14:53:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Would You Pay for a Facebook Vanity URL?</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/04/23/facebook-vanity-url/#comment-10804285</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Absolutely not. But then, I don't really care about vanity URLs; in many ways, I prefer not to have one as it makes me less 'guessable'. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Paracademia</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 12:44:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Would You Pay for a Facebook Vanity URL?</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/04/23/facebook-vanity-url/#comment-10745774</link><description>&lt;p&gt;can't get the facebook vanity url you want or don't have 1,000 fans on your page?  here's an alternative way to get what you want. &lt;a href="http://blog.studiomds.com/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://blog.studiomds.com/"&gt;http://blog.studiomds.com/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Matt D. Smith</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 13:59:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Would You Pay for a Facebook Vanity URL?</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/04/23/facebook-vanity-url/#comment-10674875</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Yes I would pay for a Facebook Vanity URL .It makes sense and Facebook usernames will be a big player in google search rankings since Google wave is set to come out and Facebook wants to probably go for more of  a real time technology like that of twitter.&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://hubpages.com/hub/Facebook-Username-Vanity-Url-Yet" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://hubpages.com/hub/Facebook-Username-Vanity-Url-Yet"&gt;http://hubpages.com/hub/Fac...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dr Radcliffe</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 20:16:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Would You Pay for a Facebook Vanity URL?</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/04/23/facebook-vanity-url/#comment-9929357</link><description>&lt;p&gt;No way in hell I'd pay for a vanity URL. I switched to Myspace because it wasn't about all that stupid change your background, font, colors etc. crap. I wanted to be apart of something a little more mature and for my age group. At the time it was for College students only. Which was great! Then they insulted us by adding those stupid HS kids into the mix and Facebook became a little too much like Myspace. Honestly, after that I stopped using it as much. It's supposed to be social networking.... not who has the coolest URL.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Hanna</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2009 10:58:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Would You Pay for a Facebook Vanity URL?</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/04/23/facebook-vanity-url/#comment-8951843</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I think this is a stupid idea. Every social site on the planet offers you a vanity URL for free (if they have that option at all) Why should Facebook be different? What do they offer extra? I can understand a paid plus account, but the benefits should be like statistics, detailed info on who visited your profile and other innovative functions. Vanity URL's should NOT be a part of any such package.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Erwin1974</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 03 May 2009 09:50:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Would You Pay for a Facebook Vanity URL?</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/04/23/facebook-vanity-url/#comment-8910691</link><description>&lt;p&gt;My guess is large companies will pay. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Whitney Pannell</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2009 19:17:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Would You Pay for a Facebook Vanity URL?</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/04/23/facebook-vanity-url/#comment-8863553</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Well, really .... Pay for something that i consider to be such a defective ( intended or not ) issue? No way Jose ...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Antonio Castro</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 11:04:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Would You Pay for a Facebook Vanity URL?</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/04/23/facebook-vanity-url/#comment-8849433</link><description>&lt;p&gt;yeah, for sho' that sounds awsome&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jonny "the Heartbreaker"</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 22:45:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Would You Pay for a Facebook Vanity URL?</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/04/23/facebook-vanity-url/#comment-8838775</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I have my own version called a subdomain. :P I wouldnt pay for it&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Djtwin</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 20:34:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Would You Pay for a Facebook Vanity URL?</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/04/23/facebook-vanity-url/#comment-8798994</link><description>&lt;p&gt;You will then have to put in the SEO work to get anyone to notice you. At least you will have some clout on Facebook's network.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Redirecting means nothing if no one sees your site on Google. And if they do see your site on Google, then you probably have no need for added marketing campaigns. But other people do.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">redsoxmaniac</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 00:55:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Would You Pay for a Facebook Vanity URL?</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/04/23/facebook-vanity-url/#comment-8798877</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Totally agree.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt; If they can get conglomerate partnerships ( vanities for corporations , big companies ), like lets say $40,000 a year with a little bit of ad inventory and marketing perks for 200 companies ( ABC/Disney, Comcast ) that alone would be worth $8 million a year.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt; I think the model is suited to smaller companies and people, with small yearly fees ( like $15 year ), and I do wonder how it would play out. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">redsoxmaniac</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 00:48:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Would You Pay for a Facebook Vanity URL?</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/04/23/facebook-vanity-url/#comment-8798822</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Its called value. Think of it as a party at college. There are parties that have free beer, and there are parties that you have to pay.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;But the paid parties are closer, and have way cooler people, the other parties, not so much. So yes, some people ( not all ) would be willing to pay. How much? We'll see.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">redsoxmaniac</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 00:44:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Would You Pay for a Facebook Vanity URL?</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/04/23/facebook-vanity-url/#comment-8798788</link><description>&lt;p&gt;But you are attached to a social system, which is also a passive form of expanding a name. I have my own named website, but 100X more people go to my &lt;a href="http://wordpress.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="wordpress.com"&gt;wordpress.com&lt;/a&gt; site. The domain purchasing is good, but Facebook isn't competing in this market.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The vanity market is essentially an extra advertising/marketing/exposure function of Facebook. I don't think it would reach a huge point ( unless the vanity became something that was hard to get ) of success, but I do see the viability.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;There are other options, and Facebook is making a run at adding another for web users. Plus, most of their users don't even know how to sign up for a domain name, let alone create their own website, network, work on SEO, or domain forwarding.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">redsoxmaniac</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 00:42:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Would You Pay for a Facebook Vanity URL?</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/04/23/facebook-vanity-url/#comment-8798748</link><description>&lt;p&gt;They ddin't miss any boat; 99.9999999999% of their users don't know what BudUrl is. They just have to market vanity names attached to the facebook brand. They probably could get nice corporate money for this.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;If you were &lt;a href="http://ESPN.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="ESPN.com"&gt;ESPN.com&lt;/a&gt; and needed to network to many users, are you going to show a commercial with &lt;a href="http://Budurl.com/espn" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="Budurl.com/espn"&gt;Budurl.com/espn&lt;/a&gt; or &lt;a href="http://Facebook.com/espn" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="Facebook.com/espn"&gt;Facebook.com/espn&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Understand the market viability.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">redsoxmaniac</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 00:38:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Would You Pay for a Facebook Vanity URL?</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/04/23/facebook-vanity-url/#comment-8787175</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Agree. If I want a Vanity URL for Facebook, I just create a BudURL like this one: &lt;a href="http://www.budurl.com/TomMartin" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="www.budurl.com/TomMartin"&gt;www.budurl.com/TomMartin&lt;/a&gt; and the bonus plan... I get tracking data. Facebook missed this boat... but that said, I'm sure lots of folks will rush to get theirs.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">tom martin</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 16:47:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Would You Pay for a Facebook Vanity URL?</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/04/23/facebook-vanity-url/#comment-8702984</link><description>&lt;p&gt;NO!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;It's not that important, and if they start separating features and creating a "premium service" that means I get to use it in less ways that I am now, I would just delete the account.  I have both facebook and myspace.  I will not pay for social networking, especially when myspace isn't charging for anything for any of its features, and in fact provides some features for free that apparently facebook is considering charging for.  This is not a good idea for facebook.  The moment they mention "charge" to anyone, people are going to turn and run - Rightfully so. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Nic</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2009 10:49:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Would You Pay for a Facebook Vanity URL?</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/04/23/facebook-vanity-url/#comment-8677288</link><description>&lt;p&gt;No&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">kombizz</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2009 02:31:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Would You Pay for a Facebook Vanity URL?</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/04/23/facebook-vanity-url/#comment-8657447</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I think that I would pay (a small fee), simply because it's a lot more convenient and easier for ppl to find you on FB, especially if you're a business. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anna</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 12:16:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Would You Pay for a Facebook Vanity URL?</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/04/23/facebook-vanity-url/#comment-8656823</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I own and run &lt;a href="http://tinyfb.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://tinyfb.com"&gt;http://tinyfb.com&lt;/a&gt; a facebook link shorting site. Right now it works on profiles, but in the next few weeks i'm going to expand it into accepting groups and pages&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">scotepi</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 11:56:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Would You Pay for a Facebook Vanity URL?</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/04/23/facebook-vanity-url/#comment-8646796</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Maybe, if it was only a few dollars or something. Any more than that and it's not worth it.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Xander</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 08:12:34 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>