<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Mashable - The Social Media Guide - Latest Comments in Woofer: The 1400 Character Anti-Twitter</title><link>http://mashable.disqus.com/</link><description>Internet and Technology News - Mashable is the world’s largest blog focused exclusively on Web 2.0 and Social Networking news. With more than 5 million monthly pageviews, Mashable is the most prolific blog reviewing new Web sites and services, publishing breaking news on what’s new on the web.</description><atom:link href="https://mashable.disqus.com/woofer_the_1400_character_anti_twitter/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2009 04:51:39 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Woofer: The 1400 Character Anti-Twitter</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/08/25/woofer/#comment-15632234</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Woofer? hmmm i can't really see myself signing up for woofer, what am i gonna say for 1400 charactors!!? LOL, i dont think i talk that much in a day!! although some peeps may say otherwise LOL, idk, everyones got their opinion, i like twitter, although if twitter extended out to 160 charcators that would be cool. 1400?!?!?!?! it makes me laugh!!! LOL&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">tiggerm</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2009 04:51:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Woofer: The 1400 Character Anti-Twitter</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/08/25/woofer/#comment-15448567</link><description>&lt;p&gt;If twitter and woofer had a baby, would it be a birddog?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">CoachDebra</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2009 21:59:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Woofer: The 1400 Character Anti-Twitter</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/08/25/woofer/#comment-15445664</link><description>&lt;p&gt;This is pretty entertaining. I love a good quality spoof, Woofer is the perfect name for the larger and much more vocal micro blog. Twitter has little tiny tweets, and well, Woofs have clearly a larger connotation.  I like that they have 'characters' number. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Caitlin</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2009 20:21:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Woofer: The 1400 Character Anti-Twitter</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/08/25/woofer/#comment-15431487</link><description>&lt;p&gt;A great idea.  I kind of hope this takes off so our society can be good at something besides conciseness and efficiency for once&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://whowhatwherewheny.wordpress.com/2009/08/26/woofer-the-un-twitter/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://whowhatwherewheny.wordpress.com/2009/08/26/woofer-the-un-twitter/"&gt;http://whowhatwherewheny.wo...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Todd</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2009 14:22:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Woofer: The 1400 Character Anti-Twitter</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/08/25/woofer/#comment-15430227</link><description>&lt;p&gt;It's very blah! - don't love it and it requires to type a minimum of 1400 characters - It's a great marketing tactic though - they're driving a hell of a lot of traffic to shuffletime..good times.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Blogs Marketing</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2009 13:54:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Woofer: The 1400 Character Anti-Twitter</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/08/25/woofer/#comment-15428412</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Oh my gosh people, you guys take this way too seriously. Read the article, have a laugh. Nobody is impressed at your ability to take apart a joke concept and tell us why it won't work. It's called a PARODY.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">codygee</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2009 13:15:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Woofer: The 1400 Character Anti-Twitter</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/08/25/woofer/#comment-15425311</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I heart your "PDF" instead of PHD use.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I hate that they are just copying twitter. Be a little creative peeps&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Natalie</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2009 12:20:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Woofer: The 1400 Character Anti-Twitter</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/08/25/woofer/#comment-15422292</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Moby Dick anyone?  Hey being long-winded can turn you into a classic!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">CoachDebra</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2009 11:13:19 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Woofer: The 1400 Character Anti-Twitter</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/08/25/woofer/#comment-15418772</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Quite possibly one of the funniest posts on the web! Nice work!!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Nick</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2009 09:51:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Woofer: The 1400 Character Anti-Twitter</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/08/25/woofer/#comment-15417039</link><description>&lt;p&gt;this post was too long for me to read.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;haha&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mellyjelly5</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2009 09:05:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Woofer: The 1400 Character Anti-Twitter</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/08/25/woofer/#comment-15415855</link><description>&lt;p&gt;This sucks ... &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">sohel</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2009 08:27:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Woofer: The 1400 Character Anti-Twitter</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/08/25/woofer/#comment-15414451</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Woofers and tweeters.  Pretty funny - what about the midrange for those in between and and subwoofers for even more characters.  Kitchy and cute - I like!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Vickie Siculiano</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2009 07:39:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Woofer: The 1400 Character Anti-Twitter</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/08/25/woofer/#comment-15411893</link><description>&lt;p&gt;..or Trustler (&lt;a href="http://trustler.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://trustler.com"&gt;trustler.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a&gt;)&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">iHouse</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2009 05:54:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Woofer: The 1400 Character Anti-Twitter</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/08/25/woofer/#comment-15411804</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I don't have time to read blogs(yes, yes I read this one), and sure as hell don't have time to write one! 140 characters is just enough for me to vent my anger when using Microsoft and Adobe products all day. I have nothing else to say. How many characters was that? ;0) &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Chris Murray</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2009 05:49:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Woofer: The 1400 Character Anti-Twitter</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/08/25/woofer/#comment-15411387</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I feel a lawsuit coming on! &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Donagh Mc Sweeney</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2009 05:32:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Woofer: The 1400 Character Anti-Twitter</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/08/25/woofer/#comment-15411272</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Nothing compares to the original, but people in woofer really tried to copy the whole twitter project. Even the look and feel is 90% twitter.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Σχολή Χορού</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2009 05:26:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Woofer: The 1400 Character Anti-Twitter</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/08/25/woofer/#comment-15411014</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I use &lt;a href="http://posterous.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="posterous.com"&gt;posterous.com&lt;/a&gt; if I want to post more than 140 characters, post picstures, videos or links. Posterous rocks!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">fla030</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2009 05:17:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Woofer: The 1400 Character Anti-Twitter</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/08/25/woofer/#comment-15410464</link><description>&lt;p&gt;HAHA! That's what happens when someone spends their day processing nothing more than &amp;lt;140 character "half-thoughts". I swear twitter is dumbing down our world. Regardless of all the hype Mashable and Twitcrunch spew. Unless you're writing in Haiku... Twitter makes people truncate thoughts. I applaud the makers of Woofer. Even if it is a joke... the English language should be respected, embraced and utilized. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;RT@Shakespeare @Hemingway Twitr TxtSpk?!? I rite MidSumr Nite Dreem. 1 up ur 4 whom bell tolz. &lt;a href="http://" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://"&gt;http://&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://somestupidurlshortener.com/IcantTellWhatThisLinkIsBeforeIClickItSoItsProbablyNSWF-P0rnz" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="somestupidurlshortener.com/IcantTellWhatThisLinkIsBeforeIClickItSoItsProbablyNSWF-P0rnz"&gt;somestupidurlshortener.com/...&lt;/a&gt; &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Yeah... that sh*t is ***TOTALLY*** intellectual and classical thinking right? I dread the day high-school english lit consists of reading tweets and writing like that.  &amp;lt;140 characters is NOT the way to go.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Twitter is GREAT for promoting your product announcements, sales, etc. Its pretty useless for transmitting truly meaningful thoughts and conversation.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;P.S. Take a look at &lt;a href="http://thinkexist.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://thinkexist.com"&gt;thinkexist.com&lt;/a&gt;. It is a wonderful quotation resource. Using twitter &amp;lt;140 character standards...roughly half of the world's "great quotes" can not even be disseminated by tweets. If you want to tweet a quote AND attribute the quote to the author...the percentage drops to about 25%. Therefore, the arbitrary limitations of Twitter, which are so beloved by the bleeding-edge herd, effectively reduce the illuminated wisdom of the world by up to 75%. Backwards is NOT the way we should be going with technology. Onwards. Upwards. Outwards.... (plug for &lt;a href="http://extropy.org" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://extropy.org"&gt;http://extropy.org&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;P.P.S. (in reply to Sikku's remark below &lt;i&gt;"Dats too much.... Above all people will feel bored while reading all the 1400 characters all the time..."&lt;/i&gt;)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Hmmm. I assume that's why noooooooobody has ever bothered to read any of these: &lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/arts/bigread/top100.shtml" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.bbc.co.uk/arts/bigread/top100.shtml"&gt;http://www.bbc.co.uk/arts/b...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;"The effort required to creating a lasting work of art, which will influence individuals and society for years to come, will always outweigh the short-term benefits of pandering to the fickle zeitgeist. Take the long view. It ALWAYS wins in the end game. " - me&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Hmmm. I guess even that is too "boring", eh? 113 characters too long to post as a Tweet.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">BaronToler</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2009 04:54:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Woofer: The 1400 Character Anti-Twitter</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/08/25/woofer/#comment-15410273</link><description>&lt;p&gt;That's interesting, but it's too much effort to type up 1400 characters. Bleh &amp;gt;_&amp;lt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Curt Milnes</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2009 04:43:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Woofer: The 1400 Character Anti-Twitter</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/08/25/woofer/#comment-15409143</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Writing in 140 characters is difficult, and elaborating in 1400 chars is a pain. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Narenubi</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2009 04:07:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Woofer: The 1400 Character Anti-Twitter</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/08/25/woofer/#comment-15407305</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I like the approach, smart market move leveraging on Twitter buzz. I actually think Woofer potentially can be monetized in more ways than Twitter &lt;a href="http://www.money-era.com/category/monetizing-twitter/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.money-era.com/category/monetizing-twitter/"&gt;http://www.money-era.com/ca...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Money-Era</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2009 03:10:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Woofer: The 1400 Character Anti-Twitter</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/08/25/woofer/#comment-15404779</link><description>&lt;p&gt;A Bit Of Fun&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Peter Montgomery</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2009 01:56:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Woofer: The 1400 Character Anti-Twitter</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/08/25/woofer/#comment-15404472</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I like woofer a lot more than Shuffletime, to be perfectly honest. Shuffletime seems to be this company's answer to Stumble Upon, which I find humorous because it's unlikely that anyone will find the Shuffletime website without Stumble Upon. At least Woofer is an improvement to Twitter...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Katelyn</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2009 01:46:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Woofer: The 1400 Character Anti-Twitter</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/08/25/woofer/#comment-15404221</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Oh, absolutely. I'm a Tumblr addict, lol.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Erika Fletcher</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2009 01:36:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Woofer: The 1400 Character Anti-Twitter</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/08/25/woofer/#comment-15404121</link><description>&lt;p&gt;This is fun to play around with. I don't believe it will be popular for too long tho.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ryan Lalonde</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2009 01:32:18 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>