<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Mashable - The Social Media Guide - Latest Comments in Woman Sued for $50,000 Over a Tweet</title><link>http://mashable.disqus.com/</link><description>Internet and Technology News - Mashable is the world’s largest blog focused exclusively on Web 2.0 and Social Networking news. With more than 5 million monthly pageviews, Mashable is the most prolific blog reviewing new Web sites and services, publishing breaking news on what’s new on the web.</description><atom:link href="https://mashable.disqus.com/woman_sued_for_50000_over_a_tweet/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 00:57:41 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Woman Sued for $50,000 Over a Tweet</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/07/28/woman-sued-tweet/#comment-20765430</link><description>&lt;p&gt;wow, you're brave to say this..lol....&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;But I'm just amazed with how a simple tweet from an ordinary person who does not even tweet often could create this controversy...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">postedhere</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 00:57:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Woman Sued for $50,000 Over a Tweet</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/07/28/woman-sued-tweet/#comment-19904932</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Has there been any followup on this? Did they end up getting away with actually getting the money from her? I haven't heard about it in awhile.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Minneapolis Apartment Guy</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 12:53:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Woman Sued for $50,000 Over a Tweet</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/07/28/woman-sued-tweet/#comment-19878868</link><description>&lt;p&gt;what happened to the first amendment, does it still exist in America?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">P. Dill</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 01:28:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Woman Sued for $50,000 Over a Tweet</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/07/28/woman-sued-tweet/#comment-17638686</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I think that if someone is going to sue they should have to prove their damages. In other words who reas this and then said I won't rent or do business with them. Tort should have to be present.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Phill</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 27 Sep 2009 12:30:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Woman Sued for $50,000 Over a Tweet</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/07/28/woman-sued-tweet/#comment-17370255</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The woman used their company name in a tweet. If they aren't huge, that tweet could very well have been on the first page of results for their company.  All companies need to guard their reputations, the ones who are sh***y to their customers/clients have to work especially hard.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;She is not in the best legal position. The company cannot prove that there is NO mold, because there are mold spores almost everywhere on the planet. The problem is that she may be asked to prove that they 'think it's okay'  I hope they dropped it after making their point (the point being that they are mean and have lawyers)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Martin Higgins</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 08:13:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Woman Sued for $50,000 Over a Tweet</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/07/28/woman-sued-tweet/#comment-17108510</link><description>&lt;p&gt;iam asexy guy those woman from good family wants to enjoy sex free of cost can contact me. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">vishwanathkurup</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 05:08:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Woman Sued for $50,000 Over a Tweet</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/07/28/woman-sued-tweet/#comment-15467876</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Horizon Realty is horrible for suing without asking to remove it or any sort of desist order right there shows they are rude people without regard for others which back's up the tweet's in question's claim... it also points out that they stalk their tenants online, how else would they have come across it (with only 20 followers) unless they stalked this woman. also how much money could they have possibly lost over a comment that 20 people read before they themselves blew it up to the media, obviously now everyone has read it because it is they made it news... any twitter related lawsuit is going to be huge news. so if anything they ruined their own reputation. Are they going to sue me now for pointing out the truth? maybe they should sue themselves for making this so well known.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">pete</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2009 10:18:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Woman Sued for $50,000 Over a Tweet</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/07/28/woman-sued-tweet/#comment-14795730</link><description>&lt;p&gt;What if her friend had just said to her, "Would it be Okay with your landlord if I stay with you for a while? Someone told me that I should not stay in this moldy apartment."&lt;br&gt;Her reply then makes Horizon look very generous, caring and kind by allowing her friend to stay for a while.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Marc</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2009 15:22:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Woman Sued for $50,000 Over a Tweet</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/07/28/woman-sued-tweet/#comment-14795683</link><description>&lt;p&gt;What if her friend had just said to her, "Would it be Okay with your landlord if I stay with you for a while? Someone told me that I should not stay in this moldy apartment."&lt;br&gt;Her reply then makes Horizon look very generous, caring and kind by allowing her friend to stay for a while.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Marc</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2009 15:20:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Woman Sued for $50,000 Over a Tweet</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/07/28/woman-sued-tweet/#comment-14513934</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I completely agree with unveiled.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">deanholmes</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 09 Aug 2009 10:14:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Woman Sued for $50,000 Over a Tweet</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/07/28/woman-sued-tweet/#comment-14511549</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Who closed Amanda Bonnen's Twitter account? Twitter management or Ms. Bonnen herself? &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cat</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 09 Aug 2009 07:06:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Woman Sued for $50,000 Over a Tweet</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/07/28/woman-sued-tweet/#comment-13956359</link><description>&lt;p&gt;cool.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">cool.</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2009 22:39:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Woman Sued for $50,000 Over a Tweet</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/07/28/woman-sued-tweet/#comment-13876099</link><description>&lt;p&gt;How many more peiple do you think found out about this due to them suing?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">benpitman</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2009 08:45:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Woman Sued for $50,000 Over a Tweet</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/07/28/woman-sued-tweet/#comment-13871999</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Will Horizon sue first ask questions later for their own staffers badmouthing tweets? &lt;a href="http://clicktoanswers.blogspot.com/2009/08/tired-of-all-these-tennants-horizon.html" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://clicktoanswers.blogspot.com/2009/08/tired-of-all-these-tennants-horizon.html"&gt;http://clicktoanswers.blogs...&lt;/a&gt; probably.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Craigy</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2009 04:34:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Woman Sued for $50,000 Over a Tweet</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/07/28/woman-sued-tweet/#comment-13864571</link><description>&lt;p&gt;A sue first ask questions later type of company is definitely one I would never do business with&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">shelia32</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2009 23:48:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Woman Sued for $50,000 Over a Tweet</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/07/28/woman-sued-tweet/#comment-13864558</link><description>&lt;p&gt;A sue first ask questions later type of company is definitely one I would never do business with&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">shelia32</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2009 23:48:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Woman Sued for $50,000 Over a Tweet</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/07/28/woman-sued-tweet/#comment-13864548</link><description>&lt;p&gt;A sue first ask questions later type of company is definitely one I would never do business with&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">shelia32</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2009 23:48:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Woman Sued for $50,000 Over a Tweet</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/07/28/woman-sued-tweet/#comment-13849708</link><description>&lt;p&gt;This sounds like a ridiculous law suit. I don't know all of the ins and outs of libel law but give me a break. The news of this company suing over a tweet to 20 followers is much more negative than a quick tweet about having mold in her apartment. "We’re a sue first, ask questions later kind of an organization”. That pretty much says it all. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">SpiritualShow</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2009 16:36:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Woman Sued for $50,000 Over a Tweet</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/07/28/woman-sued-tweet/#comment-13849643</link><description>&lt;p&gt;This sounds like a ridiculous law suit. I don't know all of the ins and outs of libel law but give me a break. The news of this company suing over a tweet to 20 followers is much more negative than a quick tweet about having mold in her apartment. "We’re a sue first, ask questions later kind of an organization”. That pretty much says it all. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">SpiritualShow</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2009 16:34:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Woman Sued for $50,000 Over a Tweet</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/07/28/woman-sued-tweet/#comment-13829046</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I just put on my twitter "HORIZON REALTY DOES NOT SUPPORT FREEDOM OF SPEECH", and linked to this, lol.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anonymoose</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2009 04:05:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Woman Sued for $50,000 Over a Tweet</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/07/28/woman-sued-tweet/#comment-13824656</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Is it just me or is the comment he made about how they "are a sue first, ask questions later kind of organization" way worse than the original tweet?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;And I find it really interesting that since they made such a big stink about it more people have now heard it than ever would have originally.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">MissLynn13</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 02 Aug 2009 23:16:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Woman Sued for $50,000 Over a Tweet</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/07/28/woman-sued-tweet/#comment-13822875</link><description>&lt;p&gt;WHAT IDIOTS!!!!!THEY PROBABLY WANT THE 50GRAND TO CLEAN HER APARTMENT UP, AND SAVE THEMSELVES SOME MONEY. GLAD I DON'T LIVE IN AMERICA.HERE IN NZ THERE OFFICE WOULD'VE BEEN BURNT TO THE GROUND,AFTER HURLING OLD TEA BAGS AND ROTTEN VEG AT THEM.LMAO.BIG COMPANIES ARE A JOKE.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">eRINA</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 02 Aug 2009 21:49:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Woman Sued for $50,000 Over a Tweet</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/07/28/woman-sued-tweet/#comment-13793671</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Calling it defamation is a stretch, the comment was at a co. not a person a co doesn't have a character and is not a living person so this whole lawsuit is a joke.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Brian </dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 01 Aug 2009 19:51:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Woman Sued for $50,000 Over a Tweet</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/07/28/woman-sued-tweet/#comment-13793482</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Yeah well you ever complain about someone? if so then they should sue you too, people complain about co. and the Govt. all the time, this is just plain dumb and a waste of our judicial system.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Brian </dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 01 Aug 2009 19:42:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Woman Sued for $50,000 Over a Tweet</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/07/28/woman-sued-tweet/#comment-13793388</link><description>&lt;p&gt;This is ridiculous a person should be able to complain all they want it sounds like the Realty co. thinks they have lots of money to burn what a bunch of dopes.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Brian </dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 01 Aug 2009 19:39:08 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>