-
Website
http://mashable.com/ -
Original page
http://mashable.com/2009/10/18/wolfram-alpha-iphone-app/ -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
Robert Basil
142 comments · 8 points
-
Jennifer Van Grove
149 comments · 23 points
-
r0cketman22
317 comments · 52 points
-
rajagiri4
160 comments · 2 points
-
barringtonarch
150 comments · 4 points
-
-
Popular Threads
-
Enter the Zappos Sharing Happiness $3,000 Shopping Spree Giveaway Contest
9 hours ago · 104 comments
-
Holiday Mojo: What Kind of Seasonal Twitter User Are You?
2 hours ago · 13 comments
-
REVEALED: Details on YouTube’s VEVO Music Video Site
2 hours ago · 8 comments
-
Head to Head: Chrome for Mac vs. Chrome for Windows
5 hours ago · 20 comments
-
Your Next Car Radio Might Be Pandora
9 hours ago · 31 comments
-
Enter the Zappos Sharing Happiness $3,000 Shopping Spree Giveaway Contest
Can't you do all of these on the mobile website as well? I tried a couple of the examples in the article on the mobile website and they all show the same results as the screenshots. I still don't understand what the app does that the site doesn't....aside from a little bit of a simpler interface.
It'll show you a history of your queries, let you save queries as favorites and it supports horizontal/vertical display (which is good when looking at charts).
It's much, much faster in the app than it is on the mobile website. However, what is probably the killer feature for anyone who is using it for math or science purposes is that it has a scientific keyboard for entering stuff in. Otherwise, you'll kill yourself trying to put in curve data with the regular iPhone keyboard.
I agree with you in the long run, but I think there is a market for a $50 dollar app for turning your iPhone into a super calculator. I agree that market will be larger if Wolfram figures out some more that they should offer.
Part of me thought it would be free, but knowing it's power I expected it to be a paid app. But $50?! No way, not interested.
I understand it's powerful and can do a lot of things... but I think it's a big mistake making this so expensive. $14.99 sounds about right for it.
Oh well, I'll pass. Hopefully since their is an API someone will put out a cheaper 3rd party alternative.
After reviewing their site and running a few searches on popular stocks, they are WAYYY OFFF with their search returns.
The fundamentals W.A gave me for Citigroup are off by Billions (we're talking more than 80 billion). That's huge.
http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=citigroup
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/quote?ticker=c
We work very hard to ensure our data is as correct and reliable as is humanly possible, but once in a while things slip through the cracks. The community is an important part of keeping us honest.
It appears that for this particular issue the upstream provider for some of our financial information missed a change in shares outstanding for Citigroup from September.
This should be fixed now.
Clearly your data team merely scrubbed one data error but failed to put in place a QA process to capture future errors. And this is the standard of work at WA that you're asking people to pay $50 for? You lot wouldn't last a minute as back office clerks serving a trading floor!
If iPhone makes it more mobile, then why not just browse to WA website (using Safari, on iPhone) and compute any kind of analysis? Why pay $50?
If the iPhone app has no additional functionality than the web-based version, then the Wolfram Alpha guys have screwed up in pricing/functionality.
And if it's just a proof-of-concept thing, well then ... I would rather spend my $50 on something better ... and stick to using Wolfram Alpha, if need be, through Safari! ;)
-- Sawant
http://twitter.com/sawant
Just dead simple and to the point. Wolfram Alpha is rather a mess... (a very useful, powerfull mess... ;) )
http://kachingkaching.com/kachingkaching
http://blastoffpress.com
http://evolvhealthy.com
What math professor will let you whip out your iPhone?
Its so much work by hand if you dont have one.
in chemistry, biology, and physics classes at the same university, professors recommend a "cheapo" $15 solar powered scientific calculator. absolutely no calculators with the ability to store "alphanumeric" input are allowed, much less a stripped down version of a computer algebra system (CAS).
on a personal note, sorry wolfram...don't see the point of this app, especially at its price point. maybe $10 or $12. chances are that any student who needs a CAS would just use a school-provided (or cost-reduced) copy of mathematica (or, more likely, maple). and students/instructors who need to research other data such as those from financial markets would use whatever industry-standard tools are available. since schools often take several years to absorb technologies and tend to adopt mostly "open" platforms or locked hardware manufacturers (such as mass spectrometry instruments) that are extremely responsive to educators needs, i'm guessing that their tools of choice will not be a $50 wolfram iphone app, or most anything on the iphone/ipod devices for that matter.
though recently, my university has deployed an iphone app to provide directory services, bus schedules, course information, and campus news to the students. so maybe schools are moving closer to iphone/ipod adoption for more general purposes. if anything, however, class policies prohibiting the use of these devices (even on homework assignments) is getting more strict rather than less.
Unless Texas Instrument comes out with a Wifi calculator that becomes a standard calculator.
As far as the educational systems let you do it, use the brain to be creative and you will solve lots of more problems.
That's a key to success and wealth in many ways :)
Alejandro
If this app has a fraction of the power of Mathematica it is a great deal. (okay, obviously it has "some" fraction of the power...)
Fifty dollars is peanuts if you are a professional and if it will save you time. Even if you are a student this is nothing if you are permitted to use it in labs and lectures.
Some software takes a lot of time/money to develop and the population that has the need and ability to use it productively is small. A similar application is Madymo. Licenses used to cost us $25,000 / year. It still saved us money and they sold a lot of seats of it. Are these good apps for consumers? Nada.
If you don't like it, don't buy it. If you haven't tried it, how can you pan it and expect anyone to believe in your credibility?
+1
only 50 bucks? Totally worth.
Nice post, Christina!
PS.: '82 generation rockz! :D
Alejandro Amo
http://Twitter.com/AlejandroAmo
Im a bit worried about this, because WA lessens its value severely and their effort to manage that issue has not convinced anyone.
I want WA to actually prosper, but Im a bit worried about the facts, which make pointless to pay for the app (in the business intelligence context, I mean)
Expecting some new WA intervention, here.
Other question is if the safari version can do the same for free :D
I whink we should learn more about their differences in order for each one of us to make a decision.
The 99% of the comments in this post come from non-targeted people, anyway :)
But....installed it and immediately found a large bug. Not a big deal though, but pretty annoying when you just pad 40 euro and find out that for every empty search result the app is crashing....
But..kudoos to the Wolfram team.
I might just have this before the day is out. Let's see if I can resist blowing my money on it.
There is no way that software is worth as much as a PS3 cartridge or a date with your favorite significant other. This is our iphones we're talking about!
Stephen Wolfram must be a high school dropout or something. Look at all of us here that are so much more highly educated and successful than he. We all know that he is destined to fail with this product, just like he has with every other project he has attempted.
Let's start naming our products that are more successful than his. You go first...
I am somewhat innumerate. Would someone please explain "ten times less"?
http://bit.ly/26vxIL
It's not as polished as this one, and its been working time before the API existed. It works by parsing the website.
http://knowledge.r4t.es
we should learn more about their differences in order to make a decision.
thanks for the sharing