DISQUS

Mashable - The Social Media Guide: Wireless Revolution: Wi-Fi Between Devices Coming in 2010

  • Fays · 1 month ago
    Hum, that is nothing new on a functionality level. That was called Wifi Ad hoc: http://bit.ly/29FuC7 :)

    The only thing that will change is that, it'll be available on more devices as their Wifi adapters will adopt this new way of establishing Ad-hoc connections.
  • Jerry Zambrano · 1 month ago
    Very good information, especially given that security is always a concern for me.

    J.
  • d3bruts1d · 1 month ago
    I was trying to figure out what the big deal was. Sounded identical to Ad-Hoc connections.
  • jmadlena · 1 month ago
    The way I understand Wi-Fi Direct is that it is like an ad hoc network, but no device is acting as the hub. If I want to do an ad hoc network, I create one, and then others participate in it. But in a Wi-Fi Direct network every device participates equally, and with zero-configuration.

    That's my take on it at least.
  • Adam Ayrton Stoner · 1 month ago
    Still guessing it's not going to be as wide spread as Bluetooth... at least for a while anyway.
  • Ediciuz Virtuoso · 1 month ago
    Why not, doesn't everybody want a Wi-Fi mouse?
  • Jerry Zambrano · 1 month ago
    It sounds like a revolutionary break through in communications (WiFi et.al.) I'm not up to date with WiFi standards, but I'd be more concerned with security issues. Not too long ago, I was able to access blue-tooth devices as well as Blackberry phones. All inadvertently of course. This having been said, as a network (physical not wireless) professional, I hope this means a need for network engineers to collaborate for security purposes (increased jobs in today's market).

    Here's looking towards 2010...

    J.
  • gerald miller · 1 month ago
    Could be a real stimulus package.Looking forward to this.
    ger
  • Bob · 1 month ago
    YAWN. This is all possibly today with Bluetooth, and is not widely available because manufacturers are so concerned over control of their hardware they intentionally cripple this functionality. My PC has bluetooth, my iphone has bluetooth, why the #($%* can't I sync my iphone over bluetooth? Because apple exerts ultimate control over the hardware. I don't see how a new wireless standard (which really isn't new, it just replaces ad-hoc wireless networks, with are already NOT used today) will change anything.
  • Daniel · 1 month ago
    I'm so excited about this! It's been needed for a while now. I can't wait to see the innovation!
  • Anon · 1 month ago
    I was moving my home entertainment system the other night for a home improvement project, and as I was labeling and dissecting the maze of wires I couldn't help but imagine that sometime in the near future we would arrive at a totally wireless solution for TVs, Blu-ray, surround sound, etc. Why is it they only make six foot cables to go six inches?
  • Joe · 1 month ago
    Because they can sell you a 6' cable for 12 times more than a 6" cable and the extra 5.5' of cable only cost them an additional $0.02

    ;-)
  • Jonathon Levey · 1 month ago
    It's not exactly new technology. The PSP-1000 came out with this built-in. And the iPhone already does it too. Although as a standard, it would be handy.
  • Fakhr-E-Alam · 1 month ago
    I knew it... ! - thats the next step in wireless technology- I have written an article about Wi-Fi Gaming on Nokia N-gage (http://bit.ly/Dw8g4) device a six months back - Now I am sure this will happen soon.

    S60 Betalabs

    http://twitter.com/S60Betalabs
  • Name · 1 month ago
    Doesn't this already exist in the form Ad-Hoc networks? So this is really just a SW upgrade for 802.11x ?
  • Nikolay Kolev · 1 month ago
    This makes sense only on the go. I don't want to be taking pictures with my phone - I have a good digital camera for that purpose. With either Bluetooth, or WiFi Direct, my camera should be able to directly upload photos to my phone, which will then upload them to Flickr adding geolocation to them (my camera has a GPS built-in, it's Nikon P6000, but it drains the battery and it doesn't work most of the time). Another option is my phone to poll my camera periodically to see if there are new pictures, but this will be less energy efficient.
  • Digital Web · 1 month ago
    Wow
    I also saw Wireless Electricity to charge ur mobile and laptop.... in TED Talk
    http://bit.ly/JDWWB

    Suresh.ks
  • adzeds · 1 month ago
    This looks like an amazing development!

    Can't wait to see what cool gadgets come out as a result!
  • J suther · 1 month ago
    its already on the go before end of 2009 ! take a look at Goomeo.com
  • DeadCellZones.com · 1 month ago
    Can you imagine a wireless mesh network of cell phones and no cell towers? A P2P wireless mesh cellular network would work great on the 405 freeway in LA.
  • jimcalabrese · 1 month ago
    Anything that reduces the rat nests of cables behind my desktop or home theater would be welcome. Hopefully, WiFi Direct will have a better adoption rate than Bluetooth.
  • Erwinn · 1 month ago
    Didn't we know this already quite a while of the normal Nintendo DS...
  • Dexter · 1 month ago
    Bluetooth is draining the battery on most portable devices I have. It's a pain to remember to activate it and synchronize it every time you want to use it. My cell phone is Wifi capable but shortens the battery life. In the end the revolution should come from a long life battery. Then we can take advantage of cableless technologies...
  • tonybravo · 1 month ago
    That's where Bluetooth low energy comes in.