<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Mashable - The Social Media Guide - Latest Comments in Will You Pay For News Online? Rupert Murdoch Says You Will</title><link>http://mashable.disqus.com/</link><description>Internet and Technology News - Mashable is the world’s largest blog focused exclusively on Web 2.0 and Social Networking news. With more than 5 million monthly pageviews, Mashable is the most prolific blog reviewing new Web sites and services, publishing breaking news on what’s new on the web.</description><atom:link href="https://mashable.disqus.com/will_you_pay_for_news_online_rupert_murdoch_says_you_will/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2009 06:19:15 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Will You Pay For News Online? Rupert Murdoch Says You Will</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/08/05/murdoch-chargy-news/#comment-16177007</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The problem with free content is eventually there will be no news. A journalist who is starving because he got fired from his local paper is not going to keep blogging for altruistic reasons. He will go off and do something else.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;And online advertising is just not cutting it. If it was, all the thousands of fired journalists would get a blog, put adsense on, and away they go. But they aren't. So advertising can't be the cure for this.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;What about the idea of micropayments and getting some fair exchange going? Is it really totally unfair to pay a journalist a cent or two to read an article they spent the better part of a day writing?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Chris Wilkins</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2009 06:19:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Will You Pay For News Online? Rupert Murdoch Says You Will</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/08/05/murdoch-chargy-news/#comment-16034604</link><description>&lt;p&gt;It may indeed happen, but not at the behest of Rupert Murdoch. If the legitimate press collapses from lack of revenue, what the world will be left with is nothing but crap journalism, inuendo and unverifiable false alarms (you can already see a rise in this). But likely only after this jounalism cull will a market emerge that will pay for verifiable, reliable "Walter Cronkite" news.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">jefbrown</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 05 Sep 2009 18:34:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Will You Pay For News Online? Rupert Murdoch Says You Will</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/08/05/murdoch-chargy-news/#comment-15971672</link><description>&lt;p&gt;you need to tone it down with the pirate-slagging, mate.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">doktormcnasty</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2009 09:38:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Will You Pay For News Online? Rupert Murdoch Says You Will</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/08/05/murdoch-chargy-news/#comment-14749743</link><description>&lt;p&gt;He's gonna buy Twitter and charge you to tweet and to read tweets!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Robert</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2009 17:37:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Will You Pay For News Online? Rupert Murdoch Says You Will</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/08/05/murdoch-chargy-news/#comment-14468227</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Paying for news content is my opinion one of the worst things you can do as a newspaper. If you're running a news agency, one of the key values you need is openness. If you can provide your content to the world in a fast an easy way, your news will be evaluated next to other news agencies. This empowers the objectivity of your article (which is a basic rule among good journalism), and makes your company strive for more originality and more profoundness in the article. Competition in the news world makes news better, more reliable and profounder. And paying for news does exactly the opposite, cause no one will pay two subscriptions, just to lay 2 articles side by side and check if they hit the same points.&lt;br&gt;It is the task of a news agency to find a way to earn money while staying open and reliable to the world. And this is not hard: look at how the Guardian has opened up their API. This makes their content easy to share, yet they include advertisements in the content as well, which let them earn money.&lt;br&gt;And apart from that, the internet has always been free, and will stay free. Making you pay for a news website will not stop people from sharing the content, or copy-pasting it into their own blog or website. &lt;br&gt;Murdoch should open up and see what great advantages the next generation of the internet has to offer to news agencies. Only then he will see openness, individuality, originality and interaction are the only values that really matter.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Castemelijn</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 08 Aug 2009 04:22:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Will You Pay For News Online? Rupert Murdoch Says You Will</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/08/05/murdoch-chargy-news/#comment-14427176</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Well I would say - too little, too late. What does he expect? News corporation do not have monopoly for news. News spread even faster via the Twitter then via "news websites". As for the wsj - this is an exemption - it is thematic journal address to business people and is needed for people do their job, so most likely they will pay for it. But all the rest - "leisure news" - I don't think he could get any money from. Just like tobacco industry is slowly disappearing, the news industry had its peak already... &lt;br&gt;I think similar will happen with copyrights... Internet changed it all - copyrights in their current form are obsolete ... I am willing to pay for a song or for a movie, but I will not allow to be robed by the phonographic industry as they were doing it uptillnow. They wanted to milk the money and keep the status quo as long as possible selling obsolete CDs ... people found a way around it - so now they are trying to put the toothpaste back into the tube... Good luck. And if they found an adequate business model to sell reasonably content it might have worked.&lt;br&gt;Globalisation works both ways gentlemen ... and now it is the time for the masses to gain from globalisation, not only the rich few should profit from it. &lt;br&gt;In my humble opinion it is too late ... you were too greedy to adapt to changes so now you lost it all. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">peter</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2009 07:56:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Will You Pay For News Online? Rupert Murdoch Says You Will</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/08/05/murdoch-chargy-news/#comment-14427169</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Well I would say - too little, too late. What does he expect? News corporation do not have monopoly for news. News spread even faster via the Twitter then via "news websites". As for the wsj - this is an exemption - it is thematic journal address to business people and is needed for people do their job, so most likely they will pay for it. But all the rest - "leisure news" - I don't think he could get any money from. Just like tobacco industry is slowly disappearing, the news industry had its peak already... &lt;br&gt;I think similar will happen with copyrights... Internet changed it all - copyrights in their current form are obsolete ... I am willing to pay for a song or for a movie, but I will not allow to be robed by the phonographic industry as they were doing it uptillnow. They wanted to milk the money and keep the status quo as long as possible selling obsolete CDs ... people found a way around it - so now they are trying to put the toothpaste back into the tube... Good luck. And if they found an adequate business model to sell reasonably content it might have worked.&lt;br&gt;Globalisation works both ways gentlemen ... and now it is the time for the masses to gain from globalisation, not only the rich few should profit from it. &lt;br&gt;In my humble opinion it is too late ... you were too greedy to adapt to changes so now you lost it all. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">peter</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2009 07:55:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Will You Pay For News Online? Rupert Murdoch Says You Will</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/08/05/murdoch-chargy-news/#comment-14419860</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The post office is next to charge for all services,i.e. ebill, epay, etc.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">F. R. Plank</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2009 04:52:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Will You Pay For News Online? Rupert Murdoch Says You Will</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/08/05/murdoch-chargy-news/#comment-14413526</link><description>&lt;p&gt;By all means take the Internet landscape from free to paid content, and allow them to see that they are not really a necessity at all.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The digital conversion took America by ransom on behalf of the cable industry -- why wouldn't the previously dominated newspaper industry try to do the same.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;cherry picking the news in print, radio, internet, cable....&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ahrcanum</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 23:18:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Will You Pay For News Online? Rupert Murdoch Says You Will</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/08/05/murdoch-chargy-news/#comment-14390780</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Visit &lt;a href="http://www.silobreaker.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="www.silobreaker.com"&gt;www.silobreaker.com&lt;/a&gt; for free news from all around the world. No charge.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Kelly</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 16:03:19 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Will You Pay For News Online? Rupert Murdoch Says You Will</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/08/05/murdoch-chargy-news/#comment-14386823</link><description>&lt;p&gt;wow, this is bad news for all the people tweeting right now!!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Vernon Sanchez</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 15:38:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Will You Pay For News Online? Rupert Murdoch Says You Will</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/08/05/murdoch-chargy-news/#comment-14361924</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Well hell, guess I'm in trouble then not to mention the million or so other bloggers out there who quote excerpts from the AP and other news sources in our posts (complete with links back to the original article). I don't remember seeing any disclaimer stating that I have to pay them for using bits of text from their news articles. There were no anti-context (right-click) menu protection built into the site that carried these articles that would prevent me from copying the text I wished to quote. Sure there's the Copyright notice at the bottom of each article, I have the same thing on my site but it hardly keeps anyone from using my home spun content if they want to.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">kmb42vt</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 14:40:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Will You Pay For News Online? Rupert Murdoch Says You Will</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/08/05/murdoch-chargy-news/#comment-14356795</link><description>&lt;p&gt;What a terrible idea. People will just get their free news somewhere else&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Matt Wilson</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 14:16:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Will You Pay For News Online? Rupert Murdoch Says You Will</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/08/05/murdoch-chargy-news/#comment-14355860</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Think about it...We don't pay to watch TV news (yes, we pay the cable company, for access to television, but we also already pay an ISP for internet access). We all already have enough bills to pay. We won't pay for online news, and only an idiot would pay for the drivel FOX puts out, anyway. Okay, sure, some people pay for magazine ... Read Moresubscriptions, but, I think even that is deteriorating.&lt;br&gt;There are plenty of community run, grassroots news sites, blogs, etc. where we can find news content that interests us, and people share information so fast on the internet (twitter, FB, etc.), that it just isn't a feasible business model. Why would anyone pay for news from some nauseating, highly biased, corporate news outlet? They are going down...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">tony</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 14:03:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Will You Pay For News Online? Rupert Murdoch Says You Will</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/08/05/murdoch-chargy-news/#comment-14354399</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Wow Rupert! You really don't get the Internet do you?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Why would I pay for something I can get for free? Even if you have something that I can't get from sowhere else; why would I bother? There is just too much information out there.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Chris R</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 13:36:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Will You Pay For News Online? Rupert Murdoch Says You Will</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/08/05/murdoch-chargy-news/#comment-14347278</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Murdoch should get the GOP to pay for Fox News. They might as well make more money for schilling for them.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Al Delgado</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 11:16:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Will You Pay For News Online? Rupert Murdoch Says You Will</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/08/05/murdoch-chargy-news/#comment-14347217</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Extra! Extra! Old man has outdated idea! &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Hoff</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 11:15:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Will You Pay For News Online? Rupert Murdoch Says You Will</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/08/05/murdoch-chargy-news/#comment-14347019</link><description>&lt;p&gt;For those of you supporting Murdoch's idea of charging for all the news, let me ask you:  Do you really want people like Rupert Murdoch controlling what you can read?  Just because you paid for it, would you really trust him to give you accurate and unbiased news?  Without checks and balances, people like Murdoch would have us all become ultra conservative drones.  Do you really think that Murdoch and his kind have your best interests at heart?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Northwest Guy</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 11:11:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Will You Pay For News Online? Rupert Murdoch Says You Will</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/08/05/murdoch-chargy-news/#comment-14346722</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Why pay for news when other media are free? May be for WSJ business critical information but for public non exclusive news.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Seba</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 11:05:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Will You Pay For News Online? Rupert Murdoch Says You Will</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/08/05/murdoch-chargy-news/#comment-14346665</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Why pay for news when other media are free? May be for WSJ business critical information but for public non exclusive news.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Seba</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 11:04:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Will You Pay For News Online? Rupert Murdoch Says You Will</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/08/05/murdoch-chargy-news/#comment-14346304</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Rupert Murdoch is a menace.  He is an example of someone who has gone power mad.  His disregard (and contempt) for the rest of... humanity, is disgusting.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Northwest Guy</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 10:56:51 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Will You Pay For News Online? Rupert Murdoch Says You Will</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/08/05/murdoch-chargy-news/#comment-14345576</link><description>&lt;p&gt;maybe old people would pay for this, but then again many old people dont even know that there is a task bar at the bottom of the screen. old man just doesn't 'Get' the internet. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">britard</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 10:39:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Will You Pay For News Online? Rupert Murdoch Says You Will</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/08/05/murdoch-chargy-news/#comment-14345102</link><description>&lt;p&gt;haahaha&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">britard</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 10:35:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Will You Pay For News Online? Rupert Murdoch Says You Will</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/08/05/murdoch-chargy-news/#comment-14344049</link><description>&lt;p&gt;"QUALITY news coverage" ... just because you pay for it doesn't mean you get quality.  So much of the news is twisted one way or another.  Is there such a thing as quality news coverage ?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Pay for news ? not me.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Yeti</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 10:30:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Will You Pay For News Online? Rupert Murdoch Says You Will</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/08/05/murdoch-chargy-news/#comment-14342334</link><description>&lt;p&gt;No...the game has changed...Resistance is futile!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Michael</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 10:19:47 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>