-
Website
http://mashable.com/ -
Original page
http://mashable.com/2009/10/05/faceoff-pandora-vs-last-fm/ -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
Robert Basil
142 comments · 8 points
-
Jennifer Van Grove
149 comments · 23 points
-
r0cketman22
317 comments · 52 points
-
rajagiri4
160 comments · 2 points
-
barringtonarch
150 comments · 4 points
-
-
Popular Threads
-
Enter the Zappos Sharing Happiness $3,000 Shopping Spree Giveaway Contest
4 hours ago · 89 comments
-
iPhone App Offers Instant Speech-to-Text Transcription
2 hours ago · 16 comments
-
Your Next Car Radio Might Be Pandora
3 hours ago · 21 comments
-
Google Launches Chrome for Mac
5 hours ago · 27 comments
-
BREAKING: Google Launches Real-Time Search Results
1 day ago · 96 comments
-
Enter the Zappos Sharing Happiness $3,000 Shopping Spree Giveaway Contest
then, fuck you... along with hulu.
P.S. Noticed the poll is unfair to those outside of the U.S. I don't think people outside of the U.S. (ironically, including Mashable founder Pete Cashmore) can access Pandora.
However, my favorite service for music streaming is Postify by far, and I use last.fm for scrobbling
I love them both equally for different reasons, but last.fm is way more interactive and social.
QUOTE:
"Dear Pandora Visitor,
We are deeply, deeply sorry to say that due to licensing constraints, we can no longer allow access to Pandora for listeners located outside of the U.S. We will continue to work diligently to realize the vision of a truly global Pandora, but for the time being we are required to restrict its use. We are very sad to have to do this, but there is no other alternative."
I did get to use them both before the raised their drawbridges to the world.
I found Pandora's ability to have a streaming station based on a combination of songs and artists the more flexible of the two. However, Last.fm was available in the rest of the world longer. It's Squeezebox integration (not having to subscribe like Pandora) was a big plus for me. In the end, I vote Last.fm just on that.
@Barb: please remember that the internet is Global and there's not only the USA!
But the way they have built the streaming services on aren´t the way the "market" do. The right way is to let all streaming services choose or take in whatever label they want to sell. The way they doing it know you got to have all to get all the music you want. Cuz the services don´t have all music you want. That is a *ass way to solve it and going to give artists less money and at the same time going to open for darker services that don´t give a sh*t whatever they offer and artist going to get nothing as usual. Anyone with skills knowing ROS will know that people uses the easiest way to get what they really want. The problem is that music market don´t offer what people wan´t.
Regards
m00ns
Pandora seem stuck somewhere in pre-2000, the design hasn't changed and there is no community. I don't know why some people still use it.
Last.fm is not perfect, they now have more ads. But they seem to understand what it takes to go forward and they will probably be ready for the time when subscriptions really starts to be popular. The community is also great with fans making sure all the tags are correct. I would like to see Last.fm be able to do more with social media, but I'm sure they are working on it.
Pandora seem stuck somewhere in pre-2000, the design hasn't changed and there is no community. I don't know why some people still use it.
Last.fm is not perfect, they now have more ads. But they seem to understand what it takes to go forward and they will probably be ready for the time when subscriptions really starts to be popular. The community is also great with fans making sure all the tags are correct. I would like to see Last.fm be able to do more with social media, but I'm sure they are working on it.
Pandora seem stuck somewhere in pre-2000, the design hasn't changed and there is no community. I don't know why some people still use it.
Last.fm is not perfect, they now have more ads. But they seem to understand what it takes to go forward and they will probably be ready for the time when subscriptions really starts to be popular. The community is also great with fans making sure all the tags are correct. I would like to see Last.fm be able to do more with social media, but I'm sure they are working on it.
-The ability to search by artist, watch music videos and listen to artists songs without having to wait for them to play within the playlist like on Pandora.
-The bio information on each artist available so you can learn more about the music you are listening to
-The world music available is diverse and quite expansive
-The tagging feature which enables you to save your favorite songs/genres for later
-The Interactive and Social features
If you have not tried out Last.fm you should. You won't be disappointed.
You should have said for US-American Mashable readers, as others can not access Pandora if not using some proxy that slows down the net a lot and makes the streaming almost impossible. :o(
I used last.fm before Pandora, it was nice when it was still free. The sad thing is that I do not fall into their region of "free streaming" and I got to pay now. That's disappointing.
iTunes of the streaming world.
Install or get an invite.
Last.fm is a nice corporate entity and I like what CBS is doing re: radio streams... but the site I contribute to http://www.supernova.com (recently featured on Mashable's Spark o' Genius series: http://mashable.com/2009/09/18/supernova/ ) is aiming to combine user recommendation, 'unsigned' artist content, and mainstream media into one experience. This includes the live concerts/shows that connect the artist to the audience - this is what I think both Last.fm and Pandora are sort of missing.
Last.FM has a little bit of Facebookitus... convoluted, messy interface. Perhaps lite.last.FM will come out soon. :)
When I listen to these two services I find myself bored after the third song. It is NOT true Radio - It is simply a bunch of songs uploaded to a server with tons of keywords.
1: your from europe or anywhere outside of the united states.
2: you like mainstream music and socializing more then listening/discovering music.
Last.fm is owned by some huge heartless corporate power house thus the reason they can afford to make their service worldwide. It's not a bad service BUT it's more or less the wallmart of the online music industry.
1- fees,
2- better alternatives (besides last.fm). In fact, thanks to the comments here, I'm trying out slacker.com which may be the best I've found yet.
As for heartless corporations and wal-mart ... go capitalism! That's why we're able to have this discussion in the first place.
http://pandorafm.real-ity.com/
The only thing I like about Last.fm is the scrobbling ability. Its usefulness as a music recommendation engine is weak.
Pandora is only service that comes up dry, whenever you pick an artist, that's just a little bit different.
What little I've used Last.fm, it seems fairly good as a source of information about artists and "similar artists".... but again, being in Canada there's certain features I lack without paying, so I can't really judge.
Really, the only web music service I use is radio3.cbc.ca. Independent artists upload tracks, djs play them, and you can favourite individual tracks and artists, and create and share playlists. As of today, it also has multiple streams for different genres, giving you more variety. I find it creates a good mixture of having curators give you new tracks (in the form of on-air DJs and other users) and being able to create your own mixes for when you don't want to deal with anything new or outside of your tastes.
lets have a poll with all the best contenders...
Do you know how many awesome bands I found through Last.fm?
Also, there are many bands with the same name, most have a country listed in their bio.
I consider these small issues compared to not having any diverse music like Pandora.
There may be helpful users who frequently check for mistakes in the database, but for every one of those there could be thousands who continue to enter the same inaccurate or redundant information.
Last.fm has given the "global" music fan much to be happy for. I love world music and think it's awesome to discover many new bands from other countries. For me, it's a case of the "glass is half full".
I'm old enough to remember going to record stores and not finding anything or vey little info on world, jazz, classic or indie.
last.fm - Legit service with big company taken care of things. Like it or not, but that might be what saves the site. Looks like they are ready for people when they get ready for paying for online music services.
Pandora - Also legit (right?) But lacking in almost everything besides actual sounds. No pictures, real bio, social media etc. It's bare bones, some like that, I like to find new music from other music fans.
Grooveshark/blip.fm/hypemachine etc - Grooveshark has a good selection, better than Pandora and maybe as good as Last.fm. The problem with these sites is that they are unreliable, since much popular music is taken down. So your playlists can be full of holes.
(Still love Hype machine)
I tried 3 different artists as a little test on Pandora, last.fm and Grooveshark:
Sunn O)) (drone metal band) - Came up on all 3.
Veto (awesome Danish indie band) - Came up on last.fm and Grooveshark, but better results on last.fm. No show on Pandora.
Huun-Huur-Tu (world music from Tuva) - The real test here was this band, famous in "world music" but unknown to most other music fans. Came up with bio, pictures and songs on last.fm. On Grooveshark there was a couple of songs. But Pandora came up blank again.
If you like different music, last.fm and Grooveshark is good choices. Pandora seems to be lacking, unless it's popular music.
Some in the office say, I should be on their (last.fm) payroll, as an evangelist :)