<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Mashable - The Social Media Guide - Latest Comments in Verizon Doubles Early Termination Fees for Smartphones</title><link>http://mashable.disqus.com/</link><description>Internet and Technology News - Mashable is the world’s largest blog focused exclusively on Web 2.0 and Social Networking news. With more than 5 million monthly pageviews, Mashable is the most prolific blog reviewing new Web sites and services, publishing breaking news on what’s new on the web.</description><atom:link href="https://mashable.disqus.com/verizon_doubles_early_termination_fees_for_smartphones/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 22:16:49 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Verizon Doubles Early Termination Fees for Smartphones</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/11/13/verizon-etf/#comment-24857299</link><description>&lt;p&gt;thanks for the heads up.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">matrimony</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 22:16:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Verizon Doubles Early Termination Fees for Smartphones</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/11/13/verizon-etf/#comment-24239264</link><description>&lt;p&gt;prowse you are such a douche.. elchesco was merely making a point. So, here's an explanation for the slow (prowse).. Stop bitchin' about $350 because other places have it worse.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">iPhone</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 28 Nov 2009 12:50:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Verizon Doubles Early Termination Fees for Smartphones</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/11/13/verizon-etf/#comment-24183747</link><description>&lt;p&gt;this is really sad doubling up the early termination fee.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">free dating</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 11:14:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Verizon Doubles Early Termination Fees for Smartphones</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/11/13/verizon-etf/#comment-23613142</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Are you retarded??? What are you talking about? Carriers don't make any profit on the handset sale, they lose money. Heard of a subsidy? AT&amp;amp;T takes a $400 loss on the initial sale, Verizon probably takes a $300-$350 loss on the droid. Non-feature phones incur a loss of $100-$200.  Since monthly bill higher with advanced device due to data plan, carrier will pay a bigger subsidy. Average bill at AT&amp;amp;T is $50 for regular devices and close to $100 month for iPhone. That's why VZ raised the ETF. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">TMM</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 08:01:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Verizon Doubles Early Termination Fees for Smartphones</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/11/13/verizon-etf/#comment-23270055</link><description>&lt;p&gt;So long as the public "requires" that new phones be cheap as possible when buying one, then Verizon is well-within their rights. Good for them! Maybe people will stop and realize, "Oh, maybe all I DO need is this" and not get suckered into buying every shiny, new, pretty gadget that is released. Obviously legitimate gripes with service or billing are the other side of the story.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Tower Decker</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 18:53:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Verizon Doubles Early Termination Fees for Smartphones</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/11/13/verizon-etf/#comment-23147543</link><description>&lt;p&gt;This increase is on Droid phones. Early termination fees has&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;increased&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;to $350. Even if you are in the last month of your contract you will have&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;to pay $120.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;It make it harder to capture the Iphone market with this rate&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;increase.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Don't buy!!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.verizonpathetic.com/lawsuits.html" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.verizonpathetic.com/lawsuits.html"&gt;http://www.verizonpathetic....&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.verizarape.com/sort.php?type=top" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.verizarape.com/sort.php?type=top"&gt;http://www.verizarape.com/s...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">alp</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 15 Nov 2009 14:04:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Verizon Doubles Early Termination Fees for Smartphones</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/11/13/verizon-etf/#comment-23134150</link><description>&lt;p&gt;They're obviously trying to make a buck wherever they can... I can't blame them, but it's still cruddy of them.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">JimD</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 15 Nov 2009 10:22:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Verizon Doubles Early Termination Fees for Smartphones</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/11/13/verizon-etf/#comment-23084252</link><description>&lt;p&gt;From CNet:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;"It allows us to make imperfect estimates on just how much Apple is receiving in subsidies on each iPhone 3G. $4.6 billion in revenue divided by 6.9 million units equals $666.67 per iPhone. That's a little high, since some portion of that revenue has to be attached to Apple TV sales, but even making the unlikely assumption that Apple sold $500 million worth of a product it calls a "hobby" during the fourth quarter puts the average cost of an iPhone 3G at $594.20."&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Maybe a quick google search would be a good idea, before you're calling BS and lies. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Andreas Duess</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 17:46:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Verizon Doubles Early Termination Fees for Smartphones</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/11/13/verizon-etf/#comment-23073272</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Clearwire is dead. With everyone else going to LTE, Wimax with Sprint will never be viable. Wimax will die along with Clearwire when Sprint gets bought (or goes bankrupt) in the next 3 years.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mark Jonson</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 16:20:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Verizon Doubles Early Termination Fees for Smartphones</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/11/13/verizon-etf/#comment-23072811</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Agree with the SMS raping change - it should be blowjob-good, not rape-bad for SMS and MMS - we somply should not be charged for it (OK, maybe 1 dollar per month for full SMS/MMS, but that is it)   We need to focus on it ALL.  Not just SMS/MMS.  This should be a WAR, not a series of battles one at a time (problem with Americans).  Lobby congree every friggin day with this nonsense.  ETF charged over 50 dollars for any carrier or any phone is insane.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">prowse</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 16:09:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Verizon Doubles Early Termination Fees for Smartphones</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/11/13/verizon-etf/#comment-23072658</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Fuck you, spammer&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">prowse</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 16:05:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Verizon Doubles Early Termination Fees for Smartphones</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/11/13/verizon-etf/#comment-23072606</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Complete lie and bullshit sir.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">prowse</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 16:04:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Verizon Doubles Early Termination Fees for Smartphones</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/11/13/verizon-etf/#comment-23072545</link><description>&lt;p&gt;You don't need to think, you need to go to &lt;a href="http://fcc.gov" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="fcc.gov"&gt;fcc.gov&lt;/a&gt; and do a simple search - all will be answered.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">prowse</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 16:03:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Verizon Doubles Early Termination Fees for Smartphones</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/11/13/verizon-etf/#comment-23072473</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Verizon has enough users and enough employees laid off where they could charge 1/3 of their present charges, and still show a profit.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">prowse</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 16:02:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Verizon Doubles Early Termination Fees for Smartphones</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/11/13/verizon-etf/#comment-23072425</link><description>&lt;p&gt;In no way does this practice secure their future.  Ever hear of Wimax/Clear?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">prowse</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 16:01:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Verizon Doubles Early Termination Fees for Smartphones</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/11/13/verizon-etf/#comment-23072369</link><description>&lt;p&gt;IF you stay WITH Verizon, yes, but that isnt what the article is about.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">prowse</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 16:00:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Verizon Doubles Early Termination Fees for Smartphones</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/11/13/verizon-etf/#comment-23072335</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Huh?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">prowse</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 15:59:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Verizon Doubles Early Termination Fees for Smartphones</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/11/13/verizon-etf/#comment-23072299</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Nobody was talking about an iPhone, we are talking about going TO an iPhone FROM a Verizon smartphone - can't you read?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">prowse</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 15:59:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Verizon Doubles Early Termination Fees for Smartphones</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/11/13/verizon-etf/#comment-23072246</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Looking at Obama's campaign promises - one of them clearly states he will look to get Cellular companies to C &amp;amp; D their pratcie of early cancellation fees of anything over 50,00 US.  Where is this going, Mr. Pres?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">prowse</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 15:58:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Verizon Doubles Early Termination Fees for Smartphones</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/11/13/verizon-etf/#comment-23058174</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Lucky we all still have &lt;a href="http://Cellswapper.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="Cellswapper.com"&gt;Cellswapper.com&lt;/a&gt; - gets you out of any contract or early termination fees.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.cellswapper.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.cellswapper.com"&gt;http://www.cellswapper.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">A1</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 13:07:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Verizon Doubles Early Termination Fees for Smartphones</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/11/13/verizon-etf/#comment-22989116</link><description>&lt;p&gt;That's an urban myth, unfortunately. The true cost of an iPhone to AT&amp;amp;T is about double of what they sell them for to the public. Check Apple's profitability numbers for more details. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Andreas Duess</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 09:25:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Verizon Doubles Early Termination Fees for Smartphones</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/11/13/verizon-etf/#comment-22966802</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Not sure what's happening on the back end of things. But the cost of the device to the carrier is not a valid excuse for ETF. Not when they've already made a 75% profit on the device even with the consumer signing a two year contract (not to mention the huge profit from the consumers buying a device from them without signing).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I got no trouble with "for profit" companies wanting to make, well, a profit. But I DO have a problem with them using draconian methods to strong arm consumers into staying with them through outrageous ETFs. Especially when they mislead the consumer... No, blatantly LIE to the consumer saying that it's to subsidize the cost of the phone when they've already made 75+ points on the deal at the point of contract.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Brent</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 23:01:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Verizon Doubles Early Termination Fees for Smartphones</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/11/13/verizon-etf/#comment-22964793</link><description>&lt;p&gt;What consumers fail to realize is the wireless companies that continue to provide communication between them, their children, their employer etc....are for profit companies. Consumers continue to try and abuse the warranty, insurance and their own need to have the newest latest and greatest device. They expect the wireless company to absorb this cost.&lt;br&gt;Wireless companies employ thousands of people. These employees need their employer to stay profitable in order to stay employed.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Luggage Straps</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 21:58:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Verizon Doubles Early Termination Fees for Smartphones</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/11/13/verizon-etf/#comment-22960952</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I have a feeling Droid isn't going be what they expect it to be and they want to lock people in.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Coach Rollie</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 20:25:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Verizon Doubles Early Termination Fees for Smartphones</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/11/13/verizon-etf/#comment-22960206</link><description>&lt;p&gt;This whole subsidizing versus contract thing carriers are shoving down our throats is complete bullcrap as it is. And being a Verizon customer this ETF change is a smack in the face.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Carriers buy phones in bulk from manufacturers at a HUGE discount far below what they even discount the phones to us for. And sometimes even better on exclusives. I have it on good authority that AT&amp;amp;T pays an average of about 65 bucks a pop for iPhones from Apple then sells em for $199 with a 2yr contract. Throw an $80/mo data plan on top of that and I'd say AT&amp;amp;T is making at least a $2000 profit per customer.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;It's mostly US carriers that are raping us blind. Want an example, take a look at what the iPhone goes for on Orange in the UK.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;ETF's are complete bull and subsidizing is a lame excuse to be charging it.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Brent</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 20:03:46 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>