<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Mashable - The Social Media Guide - Latest Comments in Twitter’s 20 Most Prolific Spammer Avatars [Pics]</title><link>http://mashable.disqus.com/</link><description>Internet and Technology News - Mashable is the world’s largest blog focused exclusively on Web 2.0 and Social Networking news. With more than 5 million monthly pageviews, Mashable is the most prolific blog reviewing new Web sites and services, publishing breaking news on what’s new on the web.</description><atom:link href="https://mashable.disqus.com/twitters_20_most_prolific_spammer_avatars_pics/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sun, 13 Sep 2009 13:44:22 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Twitter’s 20 Most Prolific Spammer Avatars [Pics]</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/08/19/twitter-spammer-avatars/#comment-16541424</link><description>&lt;p&gt;uggh i get so annoyed when some one will start following me and i'll look at their profile and it's all written in japanese, for example. mine is all clearly in english. i always wondered how they find me...&lt;br&gt;they don't enev post anything, send me @ replies or direct messages. just follow. whats the point?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">iBeAdorkable</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 13 Sep 2009 13:44:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Twitter’s 20 Most Prolific Spammer Avatars [Pics]</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/08/19/twitter-spammer-avatars/#comment-16027108</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I'm also getting really tired of the zillion accounts for "renewable solar info" and "I've done the run, but I'm short on my fundraising goal."&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScottAllen</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 05 Sep 2009 13:40:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Twitter’s 20 Most Prolific Spammer Avatars [Pics]</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/08/19/twitter-spammer-avatars/#comment-15748415</link><description>&lt;p&gt;x300 is constantly following me. I block all the time, but the code just changes &amp;amp; there she is again.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">activistgirl</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 00:16:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Twitter’s 20 Most Prolific Spammer Avatars [Pics]</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/08/19/twitter-spammer-avatars/#comment-15598502</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Just checking if I'm on the list. lol&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ronaldredito</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 30 Aug 2009 14:22:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Twitter’s 20 Most Prolific Spammer Avatars [Pics]</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/08/19/twitter-spammer-avatars/#comment-15598159</link><description>&lt;p&gt;This is a place to make money GLOBAL &amp;amp; AUTO.Join &lt;a href="http://tinyurl.com/ml29tg" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://tinyurl.com/ml29tg"&gt;http://tinyurl.com/ml29tg&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">yuzriharjoni</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 30 Aug 2009 14:06:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Twitter’s 20 Most Prolific Spammer Avatars [Pics]</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/08/19/twitter-spammer-avatars/#comment-15446290</link><description>&lt;p&gt;unfortunately, twitblock has labeled non-spammers as spammers because of their volume of tweets&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jeanne</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2009 20:43:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Twitter’s 20 Most Prolific Spammer Avatars [Pics]</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/08/19/twitter-spammer-avatars/#comment-15221386</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I'd love to be featured here, I'd be flattered!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Max Richardson</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 22 Aug 2009 00:11:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Twitter’s 20 Most Prolific Spammer Avatars [Pics]</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/08/19/twitter-spammer-avatars/#comment-15193024</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks for the tip ;)&lt;br&gt;although penalizing the use of legitimate apps like Twitterfeed is not practical.&lt;br&gt;I have also noted HelloTxt being used by spammers&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">timwhitlock</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2009 10:31:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Twitter’s 20 Most Prolific Spammer Avatars [Pics]</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/08/19/twitter-spammer-avatars/#comment-15185742</link><description>&lt;p&gt;you by the looks of it&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Rhys</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2009 04:56:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Twitter’s 20 Most Prolific Spammer Avatars [Pics]</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/08/19/twitter-spammer-avatars/#comment-15185731</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I wonder if the people who they actually are know they're being spammed (though the top one looks like some stock imagery).&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Rhys</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2009 04:55:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Twitter’s 20 Most Prolific Spammer Avatars [Pics]</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/08/19/twitter-spammer-avatars/#comment-15140265</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I think I've run across a few of these ne'er-do-wells.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">George</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2009 14:41:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Twitter’s 20 Most Prolific Spammer Avatars [Pics]</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/08/19/twitter-spammer-avatars/#comment-15137868</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Ya spam sucks. I especially hate it when people do comment spam on blogs. I mean come on. who does this. Pay for some advertising or something.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.electroniccigarettesinc.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.electroniccigarettesinc.com"&gt;Electronic Cigarette&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jimmi</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2009 13:45:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Twitter’s 20 Most Prolific Spammer Avatars [Pics]</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/08/19/twitter-spammer-avatars/#comment-15135142</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Ya spam sucks. I especially hate it when people do comment spam on blogs. I mean come on. who does this. Pay for some advertising or something.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.electroniccigarettesinc.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.electroniccigarettesinc.com"&gt;Electronic Cigarette&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jimmi</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2009 12:45:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Twitter’s 20 Most Prolific Spammer Avatars [Pics]</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/08/19/twitter-spammer-avatars/#comment-15131915</link><description>&lt;p&gt;You know, I just used Twitblock and was shocked at the number of Twitter users that this service identified as spammers, although I know that they are not.  This doesn't seem very reliable to me.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">MJB</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2009 11:27:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Twitter’s 20 Most Prolific Spammer Avatars [Pics]</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/08/19/twitter-spammer-avatars/#comment-15131553</link><description>&lt;p&gt;It would be great if the analysis were able to look at how many real Twitter users block them as well.  I use my intuition about whether a new follow is a spammer and block them.  Months later I will see them still on Twitter, with only one tweet and thousands of followers so obviously Twitter is not.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Does anyone know how Twitter decides that an account is suspicious and suspends it?  I've seen accounts that were suspended before I could look at the profile of a new follower but I've seen suspcious account that exist for months.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">MJB</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2009 11:18:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Twitter’s 20 Most Prolific Spammer Avatars [Pics]</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/08/19/twitter-spammer-avatars/#comment-15129487</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Haven't yet seen one of these services doing it right. Simply count the number of tweets per hour to score for spamminess. Yes its harder to do than simply count follers.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Stu Carter</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2009 10:25:19 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Twitter’s 20 Most Prolific Spammer Avatars [Pics]</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/08/19/twitter-spammer-avatars/#comment-15117260</link><description>&lt;p&gt;lol, there is 2 similar avatars in the list&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">grimskin</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2009 04:17:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Twitter’s 20 Most Prolific Spammer Avatars [Pics]</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/08/19/twitter-spammer-avatars/#comment-15113093</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I checked, and found only one "Shelly Ryan" left out of a whole bunch of them. I blocked her (again), of course. I also found CelebSexVideos following me again; I blocked it too. I'm sure I'll get them again, and I'll block again. I'm ahead of Twitter on this.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dennis Jernberg</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2009 01:14:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Twitter’s 20 Most Prolific Spammer Avatars [Pics]</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/08/19/twitter-spammer-avatars/#comment-15106068</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Twitters effort are making me mad. 10 of my followers I have had a legitimate @ phone and Email conversations with have been deleted from twitter. one was about to tweet some big news. All his tweets and dms deleted. then the others were deleted. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Parkermcg</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 21:54:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Twitter’s 20 Most Prolific Spammer Avatars [Pics]</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/08/19/twitter-spammer-avatars/#comment-15105614</link><description>&lt;p&gt;:O Looks like im going to have to look out for some of these. Though i already think i have some following me but i havent yet followed or done anything back yet still waiting.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Trishal Shah</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 21:38:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Twitter’s 20 Most Prolific Spammer Avatars [Pics]</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/08/19/twitter-spammer-avatars/#comment-15103026</link><description>&lt;p&gt;great idea but at the moment its just not useful enough to use in practice as most of the account it says are spammers aren't. Still, hopefully the service will approve as more users get on board.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Rakesh</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 20:10:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Twitter’s 20 Most Prolific Spammer Avatars [Pics]</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/08/19/twitter-spammer-avatars/#comment-15101766</link><description>&lt;p&gt;It would be interesting to know the overall percentage of users spamming via Twitter, I'll be giving twitblock a go.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">sandersdesign</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 19:37:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Twitter’s 20 Most Prolific Spammer Avatars [Pics]</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/08/19/twitter-spammer-avatars/#comment-15099509</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thank you for make us know.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Abdullatif</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 18:55:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Twitter’s 20 Most Prolific Spammer Avatars [Pics]</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/08/19/twitter-spammer-avatars/#comment-15098330</link><description>&lt;p&gt;"twitterfeed" and "Perl Net::Twitter" are two others that are abused by spammers.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Erica</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 18:45:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Twitter’s 20 Most Prolific Spammer Avatars [Pics]</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/08/19/twitter-spammer-avatars/#comment-15091351</link><description>&lt;p&gt;me too&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bradhart</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 16:56:21 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>