<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Mashable - The Social Media Guide - Latest Comments in Twitter Spam Invades Trending Topics</title><link>http://mashable.disqus.com/</link><description>Internet and Technology News - Mashable is the world’s largest blog focused exclusively on Web 2.0 and Social Networking news. With more than 5 million monthly pageviews, Mashable is the most prolific blog reviewing new Web sites and services, publishing breaking news on what’s new on the web.</description><atom:link href="https://mashable.disqus.com/twitter_spam_invades_trending_topics/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 02:22:45 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Twitter Spam Invades Trending Topics</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/05/11/twitter-spam-trending-topics/#comment-13498277</link><description>&lt;p&gt;They can institute a "digg-up/digg-down" feature on searches to rate relevance!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">jdavies</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 02:22:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Twitter Spam Invades Trending Topics</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/05/11/twitter-spam-trending-topics/#comment-9601331</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I believe to have been banned from Twitter (rather suspended) due to a link to this article; like they give very few explanation, I guess this because it was the last tweet I was able to post...&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I've had it with Twitter... - &lt;a href="http://cli.gs/Asm9UD" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://cli.gs/Asm9UD"&gt;http://cli.gs/Asm9UD&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The Twitter censure is in place ? Ok, they're important, I keep telling that to my students, colleagues and friends, but they aren't irreplaceable yet...&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">jansegers</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 17:03:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Twitter Spam Invades Trending Topics</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/05/11/twitter-spam-trending-topics/#comment-9263798</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Tell me about it. Some channels are just inundated with automated Spam and when you notify twitter the do nothing. For example the #Sydney channel which is slowly growing is being hammered by automated Pet store Spammer who is also running a baby store. Unlike the spammers in the story above, this type of ebay like automation is easily stopped. Twitter have been notified a few times yet they do nothing.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Yet I have noticed that legitimate Optin sports update services have been shut down. So Tweeter would rather you Spam It then grow/build/facilitate newer business models, within its ecosystem....BIZ Stone You ROck....ROFL  &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">pyrmontvillage</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 21:15:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Twitter Spam Invades Trending Topics</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/05/11/twitter-spam-trending-topics/#comment-9231174</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Magpie is offering 'top Tweeters' payoffs for allowing their ID to be used to push ads. I guess it one way to see how much your reputation is worth...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mike Taylor</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2009 23:57:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Twitter Spam Invades Trending Topics</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/05/11/twitter-spam-trending-topics/#comment-9230354</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Oh No! This is yet another over-reaction to spam by someone who probably should know better and learn how to FILTER their searches.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;1. There are NOT loads of spammers in this particular example - there is just ONE - @TrevBusiness&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;2. Using the right tool for the job (e.g. TweetDeck) would easily enable the complete removal of any and all traces of this berk from one's search.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;3. To implement such a filter with TweetDeck takes roughly 10 seconds (or less)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;4. REPORT the spammers immediately to Twitter - don't bleat &amp;amp; whine (but otherwise do nothing)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Just out of curiosity I did a search for apple shampoo and out of 100 replies from the timeline just 4 were from @TrevBusiness and just one other spam re: stock that I could see. Even without TweetDeck's excellent filter capabilities this is hardly the level of problem faced by Tweeple searching for Metal Detecting where out of 100 replies from the timeline around 85 were from ONE spammer with another 12 from other spammers (in reality the SAME message though so also easily filtered) leaving just THREE actual user tweets. However even that ludicrous amount of spam is easily removed with appropriate filter usage in TweetDeck.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;PLEASE! Rather than carp on about the obvious exploitation by spammers that is bound to occur, can we have some more considered thoughts, training &amp;amp; advice offered about how to completely negate the pratts' pathetic, puerile, promotional practices so easily that they will soon learn not to bother.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Spammers win not by virtue of THEIR acts but by the naivety of OURS; i.e. those who click their links and worse BUY their trash.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;No Clicks = No Sales; No Sales = No ROI; No ROI = No spammers. Just DON'T subscribe, DON'T re-tweet and guess what? Very soon no more (commercial) spammers. It won't stop the spoilsport idiots, but fortunately TweetDeck at least should be able to handle them.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I wish filtering email spam were as simple, reliable and easy as it is to remove Twitter spam from my searches.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Best regards, Bob Lewis.&lt;br&gt;Follow me on Twitter: &lt;a href="http://twitter.com/boblewis" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://twitter.com/boblewis"&gt;http://twitter.com/boblewis&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Bob Lewis</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2009 23:12:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Twitter Spam Invades Trending Topics</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/05/11/twitter-spam-trending-topics/#comment-9222473</link><description>&lt;p&gt;immaculate infatuation is the next apple shampoo. the kids love the catch phrases... &lt;a href="http://www.immaculateinfatuation.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="www.immaculateinfatuation.com"&gt;www.immaculateinfatuation.com&lt;/a&gt; - That Stang kid is hot. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">janasullivan</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2009 18:51:19 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Twitter Spam Invades Trending Topics</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/05/11/twitter-spam-trending-topics/#comment-9219251</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Totally agree. I was also surprised to find there wasn't a "report abuse" button on a member's homepage. Seems like an obvious first step.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Chris</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2009 17:38:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Twitter Spam Invades Trending Topics</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/05/11/twitter-spam-trending-topics/#comment-9217703</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Unfortunately, it was only a matter of time. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Phoenix_Advertising</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2009 16:39:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Twitter Spam Invades Trending Topics</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/05/11/twitter-spam-trending-topics/#comment-9215552</link><description>&lt;p&gt;yikes&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Adam Ostrow</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2009 16:14:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Twitter Spam Invades Trending Topics</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/05/11/twitter-spam-trending-topics/#comment-9214875</link><description>&lt;p&gt;That's nothing! Check out this screenshot I took on my iPhone while I was searching the trend SNL last Saturday night.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://twitpic.com/4wp9d" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://twitpic.com/4wp9d"&gt;http://twitpic.com/4wp9d&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Guest</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2009 15:51:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Twitter Spam Invades Trending Topics</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/05/11/twitter-spam-trending-topics/#comment-9214827</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Yes, they need to kill it.  I've noticed that there are numerous people who are just posting the trending topics and nothing else because they want to use it for nothing but popularity.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">warbrain</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2009 15:49:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Twitter Spam Invades Trending Topics</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/05/11/twitter-spam-trending-topics/#comment-9214738</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Stuff like this isn't too challenging, actually. In this case it's a few accounts posting the same spammy domain over and over again. I posted about similar issues twitter was having a year ago.&lt;br&gt; &lt;a href="http://dcortesi.com/2008/04/16/addressing-twitter-spam-through-statistical-analysis/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://dcortesi.com/2008/04/16/addressing-twitter-spam-through-statistical-analysis/"&gt;http://dcortesi.com/2008/04...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;When it'll get really annoying is when numerous accounts get registered and they each post to the trending topics with a different URL shortener, or otherwise obfuscated link.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;This would also disappear if I could limit trending topics to my own stream. Now that would actually be useful to me.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">dacort</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2009 15:46:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Twitter Spam Invades Trending Topics</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/05/11/twitter-spam-trending-topics/#comment-9214097</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Follow #nascar on any given raceday.. Plenty of spam there and it gets old trying to report it all using DMs..&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Feydakin</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2009 15:23:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Twitter Spam Invades Trending Topics</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/05/11/twitter-spam-trending-topics/#comment-9209459</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Agreed ... should be as easy as possible to report offenders.  @Spam doesn't reach nearly enough people as it is to be effective across the whole system.   &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Adam Ostrow</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2009 13:20:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Twitter Spam Invades Trending Topics</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/05/11/twitter-spam-trending-topics/#comment-9209241</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I don't understand why we can't simply flag Tweets right next to them on the thread. It would make it so much easier and therefore more likely that people would do it. It would take a lot for my to bother to send something to @spam, but I'd use a 1 click flagging system all day long.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Socialbees</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2009 13:12:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Twitter Spam Invades Trending Topics</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/05/11/twitter-spam-trending-topics/#comment-9209132</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Good post. I actually wrote a nearly identical post yesterday evening investigating some of the areas on Twitter in which spammers have started to penetrate. I think you'll find some of the points interesting! Check it out if you have time: &lt;a href="http://plzkthxbai.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://plzkthxbai.com"&gt;http://plzkthxbai.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jason Wagner</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2009 13:08:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Twitter Spam Invades Trending Topics</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/05/11/twitter-spam-trending-topics/#comment-9209031</link><description>&lt;p&gt;It had to happen, I too wrote about it a couple of days back. &lt;a href="http://mayank.name/2009/05/09/the-great-twitter-spam-attack/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://mayank.name/2009/05/09/the-great-twitter-spam-attack/"&gt;http://mayank.name/2009/05/...&lt;/a&gt; . Twitter was quick to clear spam accounts. Next in line would be spam @replies to screw people's happinesses. A spam message containing multiple random @replies &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">MayankDhingra</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2009 13:03:51 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Twitter Spam Invades Trending Topics</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/05/11/twitter-spam-trending-topics/#comment-9208535</link><description>&lt;p&gt;You should research before you write an article. Mark Hoppus asked on one of his tweets "Josie or Apple Shampoo?" referring to songs off of Blink 182's 1998 release "Dude Ranch", not new songs, and he asked on sunday night which had nothing to do with musicmonday.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Chad</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2009 12:45:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Twitter Spam Invades Trending Topics</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/05/11/twitter-spam-trending-topics/#comment-9208190</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I agree with "atul"'s comment (above) that Twitter should do something along the lines of adding a "Report Spam" button next to "Reply" and "View Tweet" in the search results.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Spammers by their very nature are devious types (much like hackers), so regardless of whatever filters Twitter implements to combat the current problem, the spammers will come up with increasingly ingenious ways to submit polluted Tweets. "Genuine" Twitter users, however, simply will not tolerate spam. Twitter should use this fact to its advantage and ally with its core users to control the problem.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Whilst there is no substitute for Twitter getting a handle on the issue itself, by taking advantage of its own "community" spirit, Twitter has the opportunity to detect spam across all topics with the ultimate common goal of making Twitter better for everyone.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Sophie Guellard</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2009 12:33:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Twitter Spam Invades Trending Topics</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/05/11/twitter-spam-trending-topics/#comment-9207973</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Not only that but they will also have to counter people who are unethically playing with the system.  The other day I noticed a RT by someone referring to Demi Moore saying Wanda Sykes sucks (or something to that effect).  I checked to see that Demi Moore's Twitter account never said such a thing.  One can imagine the havoc such type of RTs could wreck or the possibility of it.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Is this where Twitter willing to go for the sake of popularity?  People are living in the Utopian world when it comes to internet.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">arif</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2009 12:24:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Twitter Spam Invades Trending Topics</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/05/11/twitter-spam-trending-topics/#comment-9207958</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Apple Shampoo isn't a new song. It was released on the Dude Ranch album in 1997. Just thought I'd throw that out there. And yes, down with spam.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">SelfMadeCelo</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2009 12:23:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Twitter Spam Invades Trending Topics</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/05/11/twitter-spam-trending-topics/#comment-9207846</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Damn spammers and their automated systems!!!  I hate them so much :(  Twitter users should start something like "cleanup friday" where we just look for spammers and report them.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Miguel</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2009 12:19:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Twitter Spam Invades Trending Topics</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/05/11/twitter-spam-trending-topics/#comment-9207704</link><description>&lt;p&gt;FYI, Apple Shampoo was brought up by Blink 182 guitarist Mark Hoppus, @MarkHoppus this morning.  He is still tweeting how happy he is that Apple Shampoo is trending, apparently he has no idea that its spam related.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Brian</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2009 12:13:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Twitter Spam Invades Trending Topics</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/05/11/twitter-spam-trending-topics/#comment-9207443</link><description>&lt;p&gt;This is why Twitter want a user reputation ranking system.   But adding one will forever change the simple, unstructured input scheme that helped grow the user base so quickly.   It's a fact of online life that a large user base generates lots of tempting data to mine, exploit and game, which ultimately surfaces credibility issues that require more constraints on users.   &lt;a href="http://blog.vanno.com/index.php/2009/05/10/measuring-twitters-reputation/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://blog.vanno.com/index.php/2009/05/10/measuring-twitters-reputation/"&gt;http://blog.vanno.com/index...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Nickd</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2009 12:02:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Twitter Spam Invades Trending Topics</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/05/11/twitter-spam-trending-topics/#comment-9207247</link><description>&lt;p&gt;A Mother's day cartoon that surely describes someone's mother...&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://pastexpiry.blogspot.com/2009/05/cartoon-happy-mothers-day.html" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://pastexpiry.blogspot.com/2009/05/cartoon-happy-mothers-day.html"&gt;http://pastexpiry.blogspot....&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://pastexpiry.blogspot.com/2009/05/cartoon-happy-mothers-day.html" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://pastexpiry.blogspot.com/2009/05/cartoon-happy-mothers-day.html"&gt;&lt;br&gt;*CARTOON*&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">PastExpiry</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2009 11:55:25 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>