<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Mashable - The Social Media Guide - Latest Comments in Twitter: No Commenting on Retweets at Launch</title><link>http://mashable.disqus.com/</link><description>Internet and Technology News - Mashable is the world’s largest blog focused exclusively on Web 2.0 and Social Networking news. With more than 5 million monthly pageviews, Mashable is the most prolific blog reviewing new Web sites and services, publishing breaking news on what’s new on the web.</description><atom:link href="https://mashable.disqus.com/twitter_no_commenting_on_retweets_at_launch/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 14:47:28 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Twitter: No Commenting on Retweets at Launch</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/09/22/commenting-on-retweets-2/#comment-17308166</link><description>&lt;p&gt;"...the reasoning behind excluding the feature at launch was primarily to get people comfortable with the concept of retweeting in general. Once the feature is ingrained, he said, adding in commenting functionality to the native retweet function is a very high probability..."&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Translated: "We're going to break this feature, then slowly introduce fixes, because we want you to do it the new way before we let you do it the old way."&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Marla Erwin</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 14:47:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Twitter: No Commenting on Retweets at Launch</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/09/22/commenting-on-retweets-2/#comment-17221268</link><description>&lt;p&gt;But in many ways I think it does subtract from old functionality.  It changes the overall experience.  You'll suddenly see people in your stream that you don't follow.  You'll probably see a lot more tweets in your stream.  There will be quite a few changes that may subtract from our traditional use.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">DJ Wait</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 10:46:51 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Twitter: No Commenting on Retweets at Launch</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/09/22/commenting-on-retweets-2/#comment-17215647</link><description>&lt;p&gt;definitely will continue old syntax for a while. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">richardmin</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 08:48:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Twitter: No Commenting on Retweets at Launch</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/09/22/commenting-on-retweets-2/#comment-17214874</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I think this is going to create a lot of confusion at first, but then you also have to think about what percentage of Twitter users retweet right now. I don't have numbers, but I'd imagine it's pretty low and consists mainly of power users. So for the majority of people, implementing this feature will be their first real introduction to retweeting and they'll likely be just fine with it.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I'm interested to see how third party apps implement the feature though... I rarely visit the actual website. I think their implementation of the feature is far more important to how it is received.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Brandon Eley</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 08:26:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Twitter: No Commenting on Retweets at Launch</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/09/22/commenting-on-retweets-2/#comment-17171044</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;If there’s more than 100 retweets, a sensible API would offer paginations. Failing that, they should at least give you the count of retweets, but the mockup image (which MG linked to) says “100+ users”, so they oddly don’t even give you that.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;There’s the potential for Digg-esque mashups, but only if the API provides you with the retweet tally!&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">jeux pc</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 01:28:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Twitter: No Commenting on Retweets at Launch</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/09/22/commenting-on-retweets-2/#comment-17149372</link><description>&lt;p&gt;i'll keep on using the (via @xxxxxx) format, and adding comments along the way. that's the way i've been using it, that's the way i'll keep doing it.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">maique</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 18:33:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Twitter: No Commenting on Retweets at Launch</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/09/22/commenting-on-retweets-2/#comment-17148544</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Will Twitter be any better off with people who don't understand what a retweet is and think syntax is a tax on the stupid?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Social Mix</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 18:14:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Twitter: No Commenting on Retweets at Launch</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/09/22/commenting-on-retweets-2/#comment-17148300</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I guess they don't want to confuse new and casual users with something as mind bogglingly difficult to grasp as comments. But we'll still be able to use the current retweet format, so it's not a problem for me. I suspect a lot of power users will not use the new retweet feature until comments are enabled. I wrote a short tongue-in-cheek blog post about this yesterday.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">@jaycdunn</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 18:09:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Twitter: No Commenting on Retweets at Launch</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/09/22/commenting-on-retweets-2/#comment-17147964</link><description>&lt;p&gt;So they are essentially just copying the Facebook "Like" feature? It seems somewhat pointless in my opinion, and I can't see how it will add much to the community other than confusion, especially for new users who aren't familiar with the classic retweeting standard as created by the community.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I also agree with the sentiment that instead of encouraging discussion it will numb down people and make way for a whole lot more pointless retweeting and on the whole create more clutter.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Lars-Christian</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 18:00:51 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Twitter: No Commenting on Retweets at Launch</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/09/22/commenting-on-retweets-2/#comment-17147723</link><description>&lt;p&gt;People who use twitter already know what is a retweet/RT. For the new comer, they can probably pick up retweet real quick. "...to get people comfortable with the concept of retweeting in general" is totally bullshit.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">jaycclee</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 17:55:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Twitter: No Commenting on Retweets at Launch</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/09/22/commenting-on-retweets-2/#comment-17147361</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Without comments, most (not all) retweets seem like lazy excuses for not posting something original.  I prefer to add value when possible, so will certainly continue to use traditional retweets, even if I have to do it manually with copy/paste.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Kat Nagel</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 17:46:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Twitter: No Commenting on Retweets at Launch</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/09/22/commenting-on-retweets-2/#comment-17147185</link><description>&lt;p&gt;RT @Josh So very true! Who knows a regular Twitter user who doesn't already know all about retweeting? Even new users should be familiar with it within a few hours...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Andy Coats</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 17:42:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Twitter: No Commenting on Retweets at Launch</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/09/22/commenting-on-retweets-2/#comment-17146704</link><description>&lt;p&gt;An unfortunate product decision ... A good product manager should have really fought this battle for users ... Sounds like it's going to be released before being truly ready to create a solid user experience.  This will simply add to newbie confusion with two formats existing side by side and the official one lacking annotation features that users have demanded.  Is anyone creating a legit PRD anymore?  An opportunity lost by Twitter ...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">teaneedz</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 17:32:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Twitter: No Commenting on Retweets at Launch</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/09/22/commenting-on-retweets-2/#comment-17146356</link><description>&lt;p&gt;For some reason, my thick skull had not allowed me to realize that "classic retweets" might still be possible in the new regime.  To be honest, I could see myself using both forms quite a bit.  Sometimes no comment is necessary, other times, I just want to give credit before reframing someone else's tweeted link.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;As long as they are *adding* functionality without subtracting "older traditions" of twitter, I have no objection.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Andrew Hazlett</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 17:25:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Twitter: No Commenting on Retweets at Launch</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/09/22/commenting-on-retweets-2/#comment-17145781</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I have always used the convention of adding 2 colons then comment (RT @name... :: my comments), but only if there's room. I guess I would welcome the opportunity to add more.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">jebswebs</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 17:14:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Twitter: No Commenting on Retweets at Launch</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/09/22/commenting-on-retweets-2/#comment-17145712</link><description>&lt;p&gt;If you can't comprehend the concept of retweeting within about 10 minutes, then Twitter is probably too complicated for you to use at all.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Wolfie</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 17:12:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Twitter: No Commenting on Retweets at Launch</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/09/22/commenting-on-retweets-2/#comment-17145454</link><description>&lt;p&gt;That's good news, I'm in favor of no commenting on retweets.  And the people that can't adapt to the official method I'll just unfollow.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">richrecruiter</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 17:07:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Twitter: No Commenting on Retweets at Launch</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/09/22/commenting-on-retweets-2/#comment-17144887</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I would keep using the "classic" one. I do not always comment when I RT, but I like the possibility to do so. Also, retweeting something does not automatically mean one endorses (or even "favorite") a tweet or link. This would also make people think that attribution (or even thinking about the material you are retweeting) is not important. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ernesto Priego</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 16:54:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Twitter: No Commenting on Retweets at Launch</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/09/22/commenting-on-retweets-2/#comment-17144793</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Why they making it more difficult than it is on my iPhone with TwitterFon?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">$19660765</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 16:52:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Twitter: No Commenting on Retweets at Launch</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/09/22/commenting-on-retweets-2/#comment-17144752</link><description>&lt;p&gt;So very true! Who knows a regular Twitter user who doesn't already know all about retweeting? Even new users should be familiar with it within a few hours (If I'm not exaggerating, of course).&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Josh</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 16:51:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Twitter: No Commenting on Retweets at Launch</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/09/22/commenting-on-retweets-2/#comment-17144348</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Lowest Common Denominator, my ass.  UberTwitter, on my blackberry, *shows me* what a posting is a reply to, which the website can't be bothered to do.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Baylink</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 16:42:57 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>