-
Website
http://mashable.com/ -
Original page
http://mashable.com/2009/07/24/twitter-follower-counts-lose/ -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
Jennifer Van Grove
156 comments · 26 points
-
r0cketman22
333 comments · 56 points
-
rajagiri4
160 comments · 2 points
-
barringtonarch
172 comments · 5 points
-
paramendra
156 comments · 39 points
-
-
Popular Threads
-
Firefox 4.0: New Design Changes Revealed [IMAGES]
5 hours ago · 42 comments
-
Social Media Experts Make Their Predictions for Trends in 2010
2 hours ago · 18 comments
-
iPhone OS 4.0: Already in the Wild?
3 hours ago · 9 comments
-
New Facebook Clickjacking Attack is on the Loose [WARNING]
10 hours ago · 32 comments
-
Firefox Plugin Finds Related News, Tweets and Videos While You Browse
1 hour ago · 5 comments
-
Firefox 4.0: New Design Changes Revealed [IMAGES]
i dont really mind, but it feels good to be followed. :)
FUNNY THING is I lost 6 that I was following.
Which mean I was following spammers--- LOL
I have mix feelings, I like seeing offers HOWEVER it was truly out of control. It's a good thing, all said.
VJ
but iit'sZ b3tter tO knOw th3 uUglii::trUth..Lolzz
But spam accounts are still here and active !
twitter.com/kunalex
1200 > 1130
But I havent checked yet the spam accounts...
I want them all gone.
Jolanda
The only reason I even noticed is (a) your tweet and (b) I twittered a couple days ago that I had "666" followers & felt evil. ;)
Have no idea WHO is missing & if I care that they've been nuked, though.
Thanks to Twitter's purging, I've lost about fifteen followers since yesterday. The thing I can't figure out is why these followers were removed...they all seemed legitimate to me. Yes, I have gotten my fair share of "spam" followers, which are usually obvious with tweets such as "See my pictures at..." or "Get 1000 followers in not time!...", but I don't see how fifteen of my followers were marked as spammers?
If this is how Twitter is going to react to spammers, I think they should leave it up to the user to decide what's spam and what's not.
Nah I'm happy to see em go, good to know just how many people are actually following me!
Anyway, I agree with purging the rubbish, and hope Twitter continues to monitor and banish those that aren't here to contribute positively.
I am more and more disappointed in the quality of followers; it seems about 8 out of 10 are porn/spam/I'll make you rich/SEO "expert" accounts that I would never follow. That said, I only actually "block" obvious porn accounts, since I don't even want them in my follower list.
Hopefully Twitter will eventually add more controls that will help block these BS accounts in the first place. People should be required to post a location and some type of bio info; even if it's not true, it would make for more interesting reading. In the end, quality is more important than quantity...
This brings up an interesting issue—if you know that spam accounts are following you, should you block them or not? Some people simply let them be, which inflates their count and makes it look like they are more popular than they are.
I decided not to take that approach, and keep my twitter count "honest". Those who didn't are the ones who are seen large drops in the counts—some greater than 25%!
I am happy they are trying to remove bogus/spam accounts but hope they did not remove any valid ones.
I do wonder, however, if Twitter can't find a cure for the often disgusting spam following you get - in the beginning of the process that is, rather than to carry out a periodical sweep.
Morover, I have heard of several cases where people have lost legitimate followers. In one case, only the people the tweep had added in the past two days had remained. In other words: the sweep may not have been completely accurate.
So, I guess i'd say, forgot those spammers and who cares about twitter count followers! I, for one, am not concerned!
Juhani Tontti
http://www.way2miracle.com
Spammers are seriously annoying. I do not care to know how i can make millions on twitter by giving some prat $20. I don't think so.
I believe I lost about five followers... and I only have a few to begin with but followers I chose to have following me. Would I love to have more? Absolutely ... but I want a lot of choice in who they may be.... if possible.
I also wish I could disallow people following me who follow over 1000 other people. Clearly they are not interested in reading my tweets.
i will block anyone that proves out to be selling something so I do my own policing of my site.
tweeting is more to expand my knowledge not shrink my pocket book. It is the best place to find like minds on issue you hold dear and help one in giving information to the people so when making a decision one is informed and see more than one side of an issue, Information key to success.
We lost 22 followers !
You are welcome.
Thank you.
Aggie
it doesn't matter if these were just spammy accounts i got over 100 followers nd now i've got under 90 -.-
hate it!!!!
i want my followers back!
it doesn't matter if these were just spammy accounts i got over 100 followers nd now i've got under 90 -.-
hate it!!!!
i want my followers back!
Spam followers serve one useful purpose - they allow us to follow more real people. :)
Good riddance, but Twitter really needs to fix the follow bugs and limits or at least make them more transparent. I want an API call that says "You have X number of follow calls remaining based on Y rule in effect".
I don't even bother checking who follows me (there are exceptions as I got notifications about very interesting new followers recently...) and normally follow back those who @ me :). It is simply too much work otherwise.
Like all of them was spammers! Now i only have 160..
I lost just under a thousand followers.
I'd rather have quality followers than quantity, so this clean up is OK by me. Now, if they could just do something about those automatic DM's.....
Josh
@rangelie
@carltonriddick
No worries.
Like others, I would rather have genuine people that want to follow rather than than those just hoping/expecting I'll follow back and buy their stuff...
Like others, I would rather have genuine people that want to follow rather than than those just hoping/expecting I'll follow back and buy their stuff...
Twitter is a huge spam network cross advertising other brands!
So to cut people from its sytems shows a real weekness in the overall Twitter system.
I think its a great way to communicate, but what they are showing you is just when you think your in control your not, what will they do next?
I think its very irresponsible of them to do this without any notification.
Anyway thats my say on this, happy tTwittering to you all.
Twitter is a huge spam network cross advertising other brands!
So to cut people from its sytems shows a real weekness in the overall Twitter system.
I think its a great way to communicate, but what they are showing you is just when you think your in control your not, what will they do next?
I think its very irresponsible of them to do this without any notification.
Anyway thats my say on this, happy tTwittering to you all.
What surprised me was that my two most recent followers are obviously spammy and were not deleted. The each use the same profile pic. One has a status message inviting me to see naked pics, and the other invites me to see private videos.
Funny thing is, I always check my new followers and block the spammers. I don't know how so many still got away!
It doesn't matter to me how many followers I have (or how many Facebook friends, etc). Like most people, I'm not in this for the money or the fame. I use the net to do things that are important to me, and connect with people who also find them important.
But thats a good thing.
Its nice to get an actually represenation about how many people are seeing my tweets and are hopefully all geniune accounts.
Thanks Twitter folk :)
http://twitter.com/gaksdesigns
"All You Can Do Is All You Can Do... B.A.Y.C.D.I.E. you'll Win" --A.L.Williams
Well This change doesn't matter much for me.(however who hates bigger no of followers, Still I would prefer legitimate followers, who can interact with me to grow the conversation.) ;)
Today my account have spammy followers again, so... Twitter must do this kind of things once a week at least, or I dont know. But its better to have real ppl following you, than annoying spammers.
Today my account have spammy followers again, so... Twitter must do this kind of things once a week at least, or I dont know. But its better to have real ppl following you, than annoying spammers.
Today my account have spammy followers again, so... Twitter must do this kind of things once a week at least, or I dont know. But its better to have real ppl following you, than annoying spammers.
Today my account have spammy followers again, so... Twitter must do this kind of things once a week at least, or I dont know. But its better to have real ppl following you, than annoying spammers.
Mary
and
now, i only have 27 followers.
:(
I guess those who prefer to have more followers even if they're not legitimate are silly, just interested in a large number of follower to feel popular.
I woke up and I now have 155.
Thats really upsetting!
I woke up and I now have 155.
Thats really upsetting!
SO BASICALLY I LOST 93.
but i suppose knowing my followers now are legit people, &/or businesses, is a little more exciting. so whatever.
Honestly, I don't really care.
Marieme
Marieme
Thanks for the explanation!
Thanks for the explanation!
but now i know y its ok with my i perfer to have legitimate followers rather
than spamming
Thank you to all my followers.
Marieme
Good freakin' riddance.
I was already in the top 50 of Mexico City's rankings.
Well...it's ok that Twitter had cleaned up all the spammy accounts, at least now I know who are my real followers.
=[
I wish we could see which of our followers went...
:(
And as for me, I lost 23 followers but now have 10 new. Are they spambots too??
I don't mind the drop.. I would rather have real people than spammers... Spammers don't look at my tweets so why would I want them there. The point of tweeting (for me at least) is to have people read them and to interact with you. I have been trying to clean up my list so it has saved me some work.
I was private for a while, and I didnt let any spam people follow me. Not anymore and I am noticing an influx of spam followers.
But Now I am limited in who I follow
It will take a bit of weeding again to get the numbers in Twitter balance.
Thank you for clarifying my situation
David Pylyp
Toronto
I know it exactly as I had just reached 2,500 and on my night of glory was cut down in my prime down to 2,279!
I think it's a good thing of they were the spammy accounts, but still got a shock this morning when I checked my account as it has been growing nicely.
Maybe some wine or beer tonight will help numb the pain ;-)
Aidan
PlanetSelf
I'm just glad Twitter is cracking down on those spammers. Good riddance!
Note I did go to FriendFollow and check my following and that remained fixed so no trouble there.
also do use a twitter friend & follower export backup for just these occasions
Respectfully Yours,
Ms Baby Blake
I prefer to have followers that I can learn from about Internet Marketing.
I was nice to be followed, so I don't like it that they're gone.
But yeah.. I also don't like spam-twitters.
All clean now!
All clean now!
Personally I would prefer to rid the system of spammy accounts since there is no one behind them reading or interacting with the system.
The thing I AM CONCERNED about is that my posts that used to get 200 or so visits to my blog when I posted an update have dropped to almost nothing. There is something going on with the way tweets are being distributed to my follower list as well I think
It really sucked.
(follower lose was overnight)
@Severestudioz: "i would like to have 500 legit followers please!, i only have 14 now...."
What is the record for the largest drop what happen at @aplusk numbers..I don't follow him???
What is the record for the largest drop what happen at @aplusk numbers..I don't follow him???
But I still have a lot of spammers on my account!
But I still have a lot of spammers on my account!
@Severestudioz: "i would like to have 500 legit followers please!, i only have 14 now...."
http://twitter.com/susanbeebe
It's bittersweet! Because even though I'm glad I'm not followed by spammers anymore, there's a sense of "accomplishment" related to a high follower count.
(or a slight household battle between me & my hubby)
It's bittersweet! Because even though I'm glad I'm not followed by spammers anymore, there's a sense of "accomplishment" related to a high follower count.
(or a slight household battle between me & my hubby)
Do not care - since I do not follow those spammers ...
@ouijaqueen :)
My following count dropped by perhaps four.
I just hope none of the accounts sluiced down Twitter's memory hole were legit.
My opinion is that Twitter is a big part of the future..I like most everything about it. And clearly, commercialism will ruin it if allow to. So screw free access to everyone. Make it clean and tight and real and honest and open up the communications between the people on all levels. Power to the Twitter Nation!
I am happy that Spammers are being thinned out. I always read a persons tweets if they add me, to see if I would be interested in following them. Spammers waste my time, while providing no useful information.
I prefer a lower number of real people! Cut the chaff.
I am very worried about this new policy of Twitter. I tried in vain to find an explanation. I had more than 4000 followers and was following about 3800. They set down my followers to 3000 and as new followers come in the total number doesn't keep up with the joining followers, which means that there still are followers being eliminated
My efforts to refollow have been undone again and again
Kevin Abramson
twitter.com/myoptumhealth
Kevin Abramson
twitter.com/myoptumhealth
Thanks @sping
Thanks @sping
but i'm happy if those were spammers
All said - I LOVE this feature. Thanks twitter.
Would rather have REAL people anyday.
And if anyone is unhappy about loosing a follower, follow me ... I'll follow back (unless you are a spammer) or a naughty twitterer ... oh wait ...those are my favorites!
Glad though b/c the spammers are gone!
Now i can connect with more web marketers and entrepreneurs w/o spammy tweets! YES!
Follow Me & I'll Do The Same
Twitter.com/BundlesElJefe
I also tweeted:
"I wonder if many people's 'following' lists have seen a dramatic loss in numbers? Just the spammers I suspect. :P"
I have been deleting manually those "marketing" girls that have started following me (because they think I am a man because of my user name).
Thanks for keeping us updated.
I'm so happy to get rid of the spam twitter accounts!
Have you lost followers? Yes.
If so, how many? About 10 but they didn't catch at least 1 I saw this afternoon
Has it been a big or a small change? Small Change
And lastly, are you happy about the change: Super happy and think they should keep doing this!
Would you prefer more followers, even if they’re just spammy accounts, or having a lesser number of legitimate followers? Lesser Legitimate followers. I'm not on Twitter to see how many "followers" I can get. I'm not on Twitter for as a popularity contest.
If I'm losing spammy followers, then who cares if Twitter decides to get rid of them.
I wish there was some way to PERMANENTLY ERADICATE spam!
[Or did some people think I was being too pompous?]
The question is whether or not this is going to happen again - are Twitter going to prevent the spammy accounts from following in the first place; if there's no prevention, this sort of thing will keep happening.
On July 23 at 22:01 I had 1,256 / 750 following and followers respectively.
I lost 14 that I was following and 140 that were following me.
Of those 140 following me, I have no clue, but of the 14 I was following, almost 99% positive they were NOT spammers. Its always possible, thus the .01%.
If I follow you, its because I have at least looked at your twitter account page once, chances are I have surfed to one or more of the links from your twitter account and I definitely checked out your "Web" link if you provided one. Thus I weed out the obvious spammers real fast.
I do not care about Direct Messages, as there is that issue with being able to DM and whether someone is following you or not, so I just do not use DM, ever. No trust, not reliable. JUST FYI.
So if I am immediately taken to a spam site, I will NOT follow you. Its not perfect, but I avoid the obvious spammers.
I still lost 14 that I was following, doubt that they were spammers. I know all of them were NOT spammers.
As for the a company saying it was "human error" that is IT / Telco speak for we do not want you to doubt or have less trust in our systems, thus they always blame some poor person. Worst yet, in the telco case, they would always fire someone.
So much for learning from your mistakes. Except in my telco experience, some programmer would make the mistake, yet some computer operator was fired, go figure. But it was NEVER the systems problem.
One telco got so frustrated with one company that they bought them to fix the problem, lol. Whatever works.
What bothers me now, is it would not be easy for me to figure out who those 14 are at this point. The idea of going through my email account and comparing who is there to my following list is just crazy. Obviously I could start using any tool that would track this information and the next time it happens I could write a script to compare who I am following today, to who I was following yesterday and see all 14 immediately. Of course I would need an alternative way to contact each of those 14, thus such a tool would also have other non-twitter contact information.
Is this a Twitter trust issue, perhaps. Definitely something to consider as it would suck to be one of those 14 if twitter was the only communication method that I had available to me.
It does get you thinking, doesn't it.
However, I noticed a new set of spammers coming this morning; mostly with a username starting with X and followed by numbers.
Looks like getting rid of spammers is going to be a full-time job for someone at Twitter.
James
@MeLikeGoodMusic
If you look in the Twitter Support Forums under "Frozen Timeline," you'll see thousands have been affected. Because the bug deletes all your followers but you still "see" them on your Profile, it appears as if you have a frozen timeline. Of course, you don't. There's just no one else left in your timeline but you. Did I mention this is a nightmare?
The worst of it? Absolutely NO support from Twitter on this. You're on your own when it happens, and starting from scratch. It's been a rough 48 hours.
I'm very happy that Twitter cleaned them out =)
In the category we mortals belong, Dantanner lost 2511, Joelcomm 1660, Davemalby 2230, mattaback 2144 AlohaArleen 707. Many large sized organic growth accts lost nothing like problogger,michaelmillman,zaibatsu,chrisbrogan, stocktwits...
So this not a uniform purge, but rather selective and targeted in my analysis. You draw your own conclusions. There is lot more to it.
Whenever I attract a new follower I always make a point of reading their profile & any URLs. If we share similar interests and their tweets have value of content then I follow or allow their following of my tweets. If said new followers are obvious spammers I block.
I'd be interested to know what metrics Twitter actually used to determine which accounts to purge, as whatever they were certainly haven't worked. I've noticed there are still spam accounts existing, and even those that provide the "follow-me-follow-back" chaining that serve no purpose other than fulfilling inflated ego's.
I was actually shocked to see a drop of about 200 followers! It may be due to my unfollow as well as spam purge... But it's good because I don't appreciate spam accounts as well as people who don't really have interest in me. Numbers do make an account look great! But I would prefer to have real followers.
I guess it's just about the law of attraction after all.
A few weeks ago, my account was temporarily closed and I asked twitter to look into the auto response tool that sends DM's without my consent to followers. I'm yet to hear back from them on this one. I would welcome some suggestions though. :-)x
Kind regards and many blessings
Liz.x
:-)
From my perspective, I rather have quality that quantity.
As to counts, mine went down, but still not correct.
Please keep up the good work,folks!
What do I think about Twitter's action to correct follower count? I think if they are deleting "legitimate" spam account followers - whatever that means - I'm all for it. And given that my count of followers hasn not changed in any drastical manner, I assume that I'm ok...
and for some reason i spam tweeting? i dont know where it came from.
Good to know my wit is still intact. And Yes, I am happy to lose fake accounts. I am here to truly connect with others and grow a network of friends and associates who can rely on each other not spam and waste each others time.
Thanks for the article. I love your site.
I try to vet my followers and screen for spammers, but as it turns out I guess I didn't get everyone. I had 15 deleted followers out of about 670. I would prefer to have "real" engaged followers rather than numbers. When you have inflated, inaccurate numbers it effects by stats (clicks per tweet).
Thank you Twitter!
I try to vet my followers and screen for spammers, but as it turns out I guess I didn't get everyone. I had 15 deleted followers out of about 670. I would prefer to have "real" engaged followers rather than numbers. When you have inflated, inaccurate numbers it effects by stats (clicks per tweet).
Thank you Twitter!
I'd certainly prefer to see a higher follower count than a lower one, but not if it's inaccurate. Quality over quantity should be the goal of anyone who's using Twitter for non narcissistic purposes.
Perhaps we could all do our part to maintain more accurate numbers for ourselves by deleting the spam followers when we initially identify them. (After all, they're not hard to spot.)
Absurd.
Thanks for confirming it's not just me...
- Stephanie
www.twitter.com/stephfierman
I only have 51 left
@ClayFranklin
The whole purpose of Twitter and other social media is to engage in dialogue , to have followers that are genuinely interested in similar topics and will retweet and reply, striking up a conversation. If I have a bunch of spam-prone followers, they are not going to invest their time in my dialogue. So I won't even know they are gone.
what I prefer? because of the followers limits... I prefer to have more followers (even if some of them are spammy accounts).
The API has been returning fewer actual followers than the counts shown on the page for a long time. The lost accounts had already been disabled, it was just showing a higher number on the page. Now the API returns a list of followers that matches the counts shown.
I like that. It is more factual.
and i must say, its not cool.
I lost about 50+ overnight, I was amazed. I thought it was because I was on vacation and didn't give any updates.
But now that this has been published, it makes sense now!
Well, I really hope it's the spam accounts that were deleted 'cause if it were my REAL followers -- yikes!
FYI, I've lost 70+ followers ever since the 23rd.
Ironically, just after they reduced my follower count, I got about a dozen new followers from accounts that looked equally as sketchy. I guess it's like swatting mosquitos at dusk. You can get rid of some, but they just keep coming.
@dvautier
what gives?
noice
-Becky
And im still losing 1 or 2 of them every time i refresh.
Not happy.
And im still losing 1 or 2 of them every time i refresh.
Not happy.
I really only want genuine followers, even if that means only a few!
However, since the change, altho it could be merely coincidental, I have been unable to follow anyone!
Oh, well. Go well.
There're enough issues with Twitter's site and an overload of users/traffic without adding hundreds of spam accounts and thousands of spammy messages into the mix.
it's easy for me because i only have 13 followers, and my follower count said 21, so i knew it wasn't right. now i still have 13 followers, and after the Big Correction, it says i have 16, so it's still not right unless thoser are somehow invisible followers (which doesn't seem right).
why are people disappointed about "losing" followers, when you can't lose what you didn't have? does the number make you feel better, even if it's wrong?
it's easy for me because i only have 13 followers, and my follower count said 21, so i knew it wasn't right. now i still have 13 followers, and after the Big Correction, it says i have 16, so it's still not right unless thoser are somehow invisible followers (which doesn't seem right).
why are people disappointed about "losing" followers, when you can't lose what you didn't have? does the number make you feel better, even if it's wrong?
I didn't feel I had a lot of spammers on my account for I rarely got any messages. Now I get 8 times more spam since that day. Oh well I guess that the way the tweet goes......
When you are about to lose 800 - 900 following in one fell swoop, losing 10 or so following / followers does not seem to matter as much.
I basically lose 5 - 15 followers each time twitter makes an adjustment, which really hits me now that I am hitting the first 2,000 follower / following limitation.
Does make me wonder how many others are simply losing followers because they are not following back.