<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Mashable - The Social Media Guide - Latest Comments in Twellow: The People Search That Twitter Should’ve Built</title><link>http://mashable.disqus.com/</link><description>Internet and Technology News - Mashable is the world’s largest blog focused exclusively on Web 2.0 and Social Networking news. With more than 5 million monthly pageviews, Mashable is the most prolific blog reviewing new Web sites and services, publishing breaking news on what’s new on the web.</description><atom:link href="https://mashable.disqus.com/twellow_the_people_search_that_twitter_shouldve_built/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sun, 06 Sep 2009 14:13:22 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Twellow: The People Search That Twitter Should’ve Built</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/06/24/twellow/#comment-16066437</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Piece of crap, way out of date data&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Name</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 06 Sep 2009 14:13:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Twellow: The People Search That Twitter Should’ve Built</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/06/24/twellow/#comment-9958259</link><description>&lt;p&gt;This is going to be a great resource for headhunters and job recruiters as well as people looking to find other people and friends on Twitter.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Skipease People Search</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 13:10:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Twellow: The People Search That Twitter Should’ve Built</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/06/24/twellow/#comment-6008399</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Good addition&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Fireant</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 31 Aug 2008 15:42:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Twellow: The People Search That Twitter Should’ve Built</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/06/24/twellow/#comment-6008398</link><description>&lt;p&gt;This is just the directory I've been looking for!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I've been asking our blog visitors to share their Twitter profiles with fellow visitors as it's not always easy to know who likes what on Twitter so I'm glad I found this.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Vanessa&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Vanessa</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 10 Aug 2008 14:19:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Twellow: The People Search That Twitter Should’ve Built</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/06/24/twellow/#comment-6008397</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hey,&lt;br&gt;In the next few weeks we will add twitter profiles to our social people search engine - Copenda.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Stay tuned!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Lizi,&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.copenda.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.copenda.com"&gt;http://www.copenda.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Lizi</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 07:09:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Twellow: The People Search That Twitter Should’ve Built</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/06/24/twellow/#comment-6008396</link><description>&lt;p&gt;It's another nice little tool.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I think twitter should use their spare cash to:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;1) stabilize the platform&lt;br&gt;2) buy summize or twitscoop (with a strong preference for the second one, which does the same as summize + live visualization tool of twitter's topics)&lt;br&gt;3) buy twellow&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;And with this no Plurk of this world will be able to fight back.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">David Fry</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 08:38:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Twellow: The People Search That Twitter Should’ve Built</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/06/24/twellow/#comment-6008395</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I agree that this is a feature Twitter should have implemented to make the service more useful. Maybe Twitter should use some of its $15-million in new cash to buy it along with Summize.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mark Evans</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 07:39:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Twellow: The People Search That Twitter Should’ve Built</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/06/24/twellow/#comment-6008394</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I love Twellow. It is a great tool. This is definitely something Twitter should have built themselves.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">adoma</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 21:32:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Twellow: The People Search That Twitter Should’ve Built</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/06/24/twellow/#comment-6008393</link><description>&lt;p&gt;@rykos, the thing is that it searches people based on their bio. You can't do that with google--just search all of the twitter domain, i.e. all the tweets and bios, which is still very useful, but not  the same.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;...Anyway, I wonder what would happen if Twitter straight-up started to charge for use of their API? I bet they'd make a pretty penny, but wouldn't be able to last more than a year or two after that.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;James&lt;br&gt;from&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://FaceySpacey.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="FaceySpacey.com"&gt;FaceySpacey.com&lt;/a&gt; - "The Startup Incubator"&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Facey Spacey Technologies</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 21:02:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Twellow: The People Search That Twitter Should’ve Built</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/06/24/twellow/#comment-6008392</link><description>&lt;p&gt;We're going to be seeing a lot more functionality on Twitter itself once they get the platform stabilized. This app is necessary but not sufficient.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jeff</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 21:01:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Twellow: The People Search That Twitter Should’ve Built</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/06/24/twellow/#comment-6008391</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Good addition to Twitter tools. It seems one of the best ways to find interesting new people in Twitterland.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Remind me again why Twitter is not building this stuff in the tool it self?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">efimor</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 20:43:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Twellow: The People Search That Twitter Should’ve Built</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/06/24/twellow/#comment-6008389</link><description>&lt;p&gt;perhaps the making money part of it?  Search is where the lion's share of money is made online and Twitter has effectively ceded it to others&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Adam Ostrow</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 19:28:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Twellow: The People Search That Twitter Should’ve Built</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/06/24/twellow/#comment-6008388</link><description>&lt;p&gt;What part of the definition of "communication utility" don't you understand Adam?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Why bother with cluttered front ends when others will build them when you are in the middle of ALL communications. They still control everything.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dan</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 19:24:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Twellow: The People Search That Twitter Should’ve Built</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/06/24/twellow/#comment-6008387</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The problem with making these excellent tools part of Twitter itself is that they'd be unavailable half the time ;)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mack D. Male</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 18:50:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Twellow: The People Search That Twitter Should’ve Built</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/06/24/twellow/#comment-6008386</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hey. Wow. I am going to have to be more mature around my social networks. As a result of this new tool, I had to change my Twitter bio to be a little more serious. Include words like Entrepreneur and Woman. Twellow doesn't have a category for Internet Millionaire :) . Shame.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I have just been seeking the right people to follow and this will help immeasurably.. thanks!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Andrea Yager</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 18:38:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Twellow: The People Search That Twitter Should’ve Built</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/06/24/twellow/#comment-6008385</link><description>&lt;p&gt;good feedback ... they note that their site is "public pre-alpha" so I'm sure they are working on some of these things :-)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Adam Ostrow</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 18:24:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Twellow: The People Search That Twitter Should’ve Built</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/06/24/twellow/#comment-6008384</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Impressive work. And really fast to get the result of a search query. But I do not have the full picture: (1) Disclaimer: I do not like directories in general (2) sounds like they scanned the content of the bio to decide in which category you are. OK. But what if I want to edit the category I'm belonging? (3) I am a bit disappointed there is no label/tag system.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">MMartin</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 18:20:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Twellow: The People Search That Twitter Should’ve Built</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/06/24/twellow/#comment-6008383</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Categories are a little subpar.  Horrid yellow.  Don't know if I would actually revisit the site or just straight out google the categories instead?  Easy business to duplicate and beat (site redesign?).&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Rykos</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 18:18:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Twellow: The People Search That Twitter Should’ve Built</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/06/24/twellow/#comment-6008382</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I can't make my mind up over Plurk.  I like it, but no-one seems to use it.  All my followers, and the people I follow for example.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Oli</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 17:55:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Twellow: The People Search That Twitter Should’ve Built</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/06/24/twellow/#comment-6008381</link><description>&lt;p&gt;both this and Summize should be a part of Twitter.  It's a great API and all, but search is such a big feature and Twitter is just handing the keys to others ... Oh well, awesome tools either way.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Adam Ostrow</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 17:52:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Twellow: The People Search That Twitter Should’ve Built</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/06/24/twellow/#comment-6008380</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Now this I like.  Why doesn't Twitter have this built in?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Oli</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 17:49:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Twellow: The People Search That Twitter Should’ve Built</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/06/24/twellow/#comment-6008379</link><description>&lt;p&gt;We really need something like this for Plurk&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">SportsBizGuy</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 17:48:44 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>