-
Website
http://mashable.com/ -
Original page
http://mashable.com/2009/09/07/trapped-girls-facebook/ -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
Robert Basil
142 comments · 8 points
-
Jennifer Van Grove
149 comments · 23 points
-
r0cketman22
317 comments · 52 points
-
rajagiri4
160 comments · 2 points
-
barringtonarch
150 comments · 4 points
-
-
Popular Threads
-
Enter the Zappos Sharing Happiness $3,000 Shopping Spree Giveaway Contest
4 hours ago · 88 comments
-
Your Next Car Radio Might Be Pandora
3 hours ago · 21 comments
-
Google Launches Chrome for Mac
5 hours ago · 26 comments
-
iPhone App Offers Instant Speech-to-Text Transcription
2 hours ago · 16 comments
-
BREAKING: Google Launches Real-Time Search Results
1 day ago · 96 comments
-
Enter the Zappos Sharing Happiness $3,000 Shopping Spree Giveaway Contest
Problem solved, particularly with the EMS example from Atlanta.
But I think it will also depend on the culture of the area and the age/generation of the people. Those two Australian kids grew up in a social-networking world so they probably thought that SNS is much faster; and [2] the first thing that popped up into their minds was, well, SNS.
The earlier generation will be more comfortable with voice calls, like 911 or 000 or whatever. The generation of "texters" will be comfortable with texting (again just like here in the Philippines, we prefer texting over voice calls even if calling is much cheaper in the long-run).
Social media rocks, dude...:)
Question for you though. How many people do you think would send the police on bogus runs??? Maybe Blackhawk County in Iowa doesn't have that problem. It's THE ONLY place in the U.S. that has 911 text (but you have to be a T-Mobile customer) So it's not "some police depts" it's only this one place in the middle of nowhere in Iowa.
You are the epitome of f.................. stupid...
I have called 911 about a dozen times, usually about traffic accidents and the like, and had them take so long to answer that I gave up on them. That could make the difference between living and dying if you phone loses a battery. Texting to FB would be almost immediate and lots of people could see it, instead of one or two overworked 911 operators. I assume the reason they did not answer at 911 is that they were already swamped, possibly with other people calling who had seen the same emergency (I hope). So just from reading a news article (which did not explain the girls' situation very well) we do not know if they are "stupid" or not. I guess some people are just quick to judge. Whatever. They make the beds they sleep in.
Given their age they are likely pre-paid phone customers as well...
I don't think 000 in Australia allows people to send SMS messages about problems.
Perhaps this was the only way they thought they could reach someone with their limited resources.
Uh...why do they have Facebook accounts? You have to be a high school student to create an account. (And you have to be approved by a few people who go to the school you list if you're under 18.) They're definitely in violation of the Facebook ToS...
Something needs to change in this world & fast.
We are in a time of transitions and now is the time to create strategies from a Gov 2.0 level on how to adapt and market ways to respond these changing trends. Some will argue one way, like making a direct phone call is the better way. Some circumstances that will be true, but like the story mentions at the end, what if your cell is running out of power, or the phones lines are clogged during a crisis or you are not able to talk to a 911 operator?
This is a great opportunity to see the social networks come up with some good ideas to help. That brings up another issue. I personally believe if you are one of the lucky social networks to be the size of facebook, myspace, Google, Yahoo and Twitter...you now have a corporate responsibility to help participate with government on the solutions. I know that movement is afoot, but would like to see more resources put into that effort.
Nod to privacy issues...yes! But advocates must be willing to work and come up with solutions, be part of dialogue and not panic and be nay sayers over everything. IMHO
Get with the program people. We are raising children in a technology driven world. You better learn how to use this technology so you too can save someone or yourself even... using this technology.
I applaud those little girls.
I also say that if President can post a video and send it to our email inbox, we should be able to post a video straight from our cell phone to our 911 center... (wink)
I like what you're saying! :)
The only problem I see there is, lack of information, especially when people are panicking. And more likely than not, it will be a one way communication.
@redwall_hp, +1. They shouldn't have Facebook accounts at their age. Twitter may have been more sensible (then again.. nevermind, I don't want to start a huge discussion :) ).
@lindahayles, -1. They would have been safe by calling 000 themselves.
@WisTex, "exploring the tunnels", wtf? They shouldn't have been there in the first place. They wouldn't have gotten "lost" if they didn't go "exploring". And as said earlier, they could've/should've called 000 themselves.
@Owen Kelly, good arguments. In this case though, those wouldn't hold strong.
@Name, also good arguments, but these are young girls, they could have gotten themselves into more serious danger. What if one fell and injured their self, would they still have updated their Facebook status rather than calling 000? (I sure hope not! :|) But to stick to the point, again as said before, they shouldn't have been there to begin with.
All in all, I'm glad they're safe. Hope this goes out as a message to other "lost" kids, don't update your status, at least BEFORE you call 911/000.
Whether they updated for fun or not vs help is not really clear. The article says that it wasn't clear they thought they really were in danger. I am not sure the kids didn't just think it was "cool" to be stuck down there in the beginning. anytime weird things happen, people update their pages. It doesn't mean they were dumb... just caught up in how odd their circumstances were.
You might aswell ring 000, they just to be noticed.
And by SNS-ing their situation, the "what-if-it-is-too-late" suddenly becomes comfortable to live with. "O, it's okay, we 'tweeted' it. If we die here, at least they know where we are." Unlike calling the authorities, they won't give you a chance to "explore" and "experience" stuff.
I agree, their friends did the right thing.
-- They could also have called the authorities first, then they can tweet all they like afterwards. Which is what's probably going to happen if one is lost or trapped in the mountains or some cave.
That being said, walking through storm sewers is very dangerous, something kids usually do not think about, or if they do think about it, they believe nothing bad will happen to them. They shouldn't have then there in the first place, and since they felt they were not in danger, they probably had no desire to call someone who would get them in trouble. Although, ironically, posting it on Facebook for everyone they know to see... well that wasn't too smart if you were trying to not get in trouble. LOL
I think this case, in a way, caused something positive. The use of SNS for emergency purposes (whether the girls used it to get help or just to jot down their experience), will now prompt the authorities, NGOs, and concerned citizens to prepare.
Probably for us who were born before the social-network and social-media era will find these actions crazy, but to today's generation it will be the first thing to popped into their minds - micro-blogging.
You cannot talk well enough to be understood (injured or background noise).
You don't feel you could get the message out effectively.
You know that someone else can raise the alarm better than you (due to injury or ineffectiveness to communicate via voice).
In this case, they should have called. But the case at the end of the article, and that of say the journalist who managed to tweet "Arrested." are more than appropriate times to use something other than a phone call.
I stick by my comments that unless there's a big change before I hit 25 (I'm 16 now) the world is going to turn to dust at the hands of the idiots that are, my generation.
hahaha. (jk)
Side note...are 10 and 12 year olds supposed to be allowed on Facebook?
Another young fellow in lost in Mountains called 000 three times , spoke to 3 different people and still died because he couldn't get his message across about his exact location ...perhaps if he had updated his facebook status he might have had more of a chance.
Or it's possible they didn't have service to make a call, but had enough to update their status. There isn't enough evidence here to decide they're brain dead.
Well a Twitter account wont harm I mean to say.
As the article says, I suppose they may have had problems with battery. Being young folk as well they may not have realised that 000 is still free from mobile phones. Most other "free calls" aren't free from mobile phones in Australia, so a lot of people are confused as to whether 000 is free or not from a mobile phone. More of a concern for young people who tend to rely upon prepaid plans.
Also, even if they've poor reception, 000 calls will attempt to connect to any available network (even ones they're not a customer of).
http://www.chicagobreakingnews.com/2009/08/chic...
www.blackboxstrategy.net
The problem is not at all that the girls use social media too much, but that the way they chose to call for help was not optimum. There is a difference between "too much" and "wrong time and place".
at ANY age if your STUCK in a stormdrain you would call 911/000 whoot ever it is and be like "help me damn it!". how ever this is a question into the current youth of today! i mean i am 18 and i use facebook and im gonna be honest and say i log into it everyday. But if im STUCK somewhere i am not going to update my status and say "oh dear, im in a stormdrain, halp? plz,K,Thx,Bai." im more incline to hit up the emergency services and ask them for help.
i think its due to the fact everyone is growing up in a social media society, and people need to teach there kids that facebook dosn't come first when you are in danger/stuck/being stupid.
Other comments on battery life etc don't hold water because launching a browser on the phone and connecting to the internet take far more power than a phone call and are separate to the SMS channels.
It's important to reinforce that social media is just another thing that absorbs kids attention and they should STEP AWAY FROM THE COMPUTER/PHONE. Every family needs to talk to their kids about emergencies including putting an ICE contact at the top of their mobile in case they are found unconscious.
To Linsey and other trumpeters of Facebook it is important that all communication tools have their strengths and weaknesses and getting help fast ISN'T a strength of Facebooks. Plain and simple, kids need to still have safety talks and parents need to limit social media to other brain enhancing things like reading, writing and making things. (Please don't respond with how great the writing is online)