<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Mashable - The Social Media Guide - Latest Comments in Jajah Going Ad-Supported</title><link>http://mashable.disqus.com/</link><description>Internet and Technology News - Mashable is the world’s largest blog focused exclusively on Web 2.0 and Social Networking news. With more than 5 million monthly pageviews, Mashable is the most prolific blog reviewing new Web sites and services, publishing breaking news on what’s new on the web.</description><atom:link href="https://mashable.disqus.com/thread_975/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Dec 2006 02:25:52 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Jajah Going Ad-Supported</title><link>http://mashable.com/2006/12/17/jajah-going-ad-supported/#comment-5911571</link><description>&lt;p&gt;This leads me to wonder if most revenue from sites offering free services and content will come by way of sponsorship and/or ads. Seems to be the only logical thing to do, since online ad dollars are increasing each year.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Finally, this could be an indication that Jajah's premium services (conference calls, etc.) aren't doing too well and they realized they'd do better with an ad-supported model.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Well, if Google, Yahoo, and the major broadcast networks can make billions from advertising, anyone can make a buck and do well.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ronald Lewis</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 18 Dec 2006 02:25:52 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>