<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Mashable - The Social Media Guide - Latest Comments in Spyjax: Your Browser History is Not Private!</title><link>http://mashable.disqus.com/</link><description>Internet and Technology News - Mashable is the world’s largest blog focused exclusively on Web 2.0 and Social Networking news. With more than 5 million monthly pageviews, Mashable is the most prolific blog reviewing new Web sites and services, publishing breaking news on what’s new on the web.</description><atom:link href="https://mashable.disqus.com/thread_9570/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Aug 2007 00:10:58 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Spyjax: Your Browser History is Not Private!</title><link>http://mashable.com/2007/06/01/spyjax/#comment-5949239</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Just run CCleaner, clears out the cache browser history etc.. and Its FREE... &lt;a href="http://www.reviewingit.com/index.php/content/view/56/1/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.reviewingit.com/index.php/content/view/56/1/"&gt;http://www.reviewingit.com/...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Johnathan</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 14 Aug 2007 00:10:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Spyjax: Your Browser History is Not Private!</title><link>http://mashable.com/2007/06/01/spyjax/#comment-5949238</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Michel, I didn't even check, but I'm sure the script checks if links were visited, not which colour they happen to be.&lt;br&gt;For all intents and purposes the amount of possible colours is limitless, plus it would probably more processor-intensive to check that.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Kevin Burton, I believe that this was filed already, but how could changing something in Mozilla software change the way the WWW works?&lt;br&gt;If I write a piece of software that tries to interact with the WWW somehow, it won't change anything about it.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Anyway, it sounds to me this is a security issue with JavaScript and nothing else.&lt;br&gt;Someone would need to remove support for checking link status (or whatever the proper name is) in there to really remove the vulnerability.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Sheep</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 04 Jun 2007 11:26:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Spyjax: Your Browser History is Not Private!</title><link>http://mashable.com/2007/06/01/spyjax/#comment-5949237</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Bad news guys...... there is no fix.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;There's a 3-4 year old bug filed in the Mozilla code base for this .... it can't be fixed because fixing it would break the fundamental way the web works.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Sorry :)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Kevin Burton</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 Jun 2007 02:39:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Spyjax: Your Browser History is Not Private!</title><link>http://mashable.com/2007/06/01/spyjax/#comment-5949236</link><description>&lt;p&gt;This is actually pretty old. As of last August, &lt;a href="http://jeremiahgrossman.blogspot.com/2006/08/i-know-where-youve-been.html" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://jeremiahgrossman.blogspot.com/2006/08/i-know-where-youve-been.html"&gt;someone else&lt;/a&gt; was pushing around this trick. It's clever, but not that bigga'deal. Unless you disable the ability the differentiate :visited links, this hack will persist.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Chris Messina</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 Jun 2007 00:48:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Spyjax: Your Browser History is Not Private!</title><link>http://mashable.com/2007/06/01/spyjax/#comment-5949235</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Related to dre's and Wodow's suggestion above, people might like to check:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://crypto.stanford.edu/sameorigin/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://crypto.stanford.edu/sameorigin/"&gt;http://crypto.stanford.edu/...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Some of the links return 404's but there is still good content about other types of querying. There is also a link to a related Firefox extensions called SafeCache.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anne H</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 01 Jun 2007 23:56:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Spyjax: Your Browser History is Not Private!</title><link>http://mashable.com/2007/06/01/spyjax/#comment-5949234</link><description>&lt;p&gt;If you are using Firefox, this extension seems to solve the problem:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://safehistory.com/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://safehistory.com/"&gt;http://safehistory.com/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Wodow</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 01 Jun 2007 19:47:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Spyjax: Your Browser History is Not Private!</title><link>http://mashable.com/2007/06/01/spyjax/#comment-5949233</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Spyjax works via Javascript, but it can also work by using HTML.  Turning Javascript off, or using NoScript will not help you from this attack.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;My suggestion is to run the Stanford Anti-Phishing SafeHistory Firefox and LocalRodeo extensions.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">dre</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 01 Jun 2007 17:47:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Spyjax: Your Browser History is Not Private!</title><link>http://mashable.com/2007/06/01/spyjax/#comment-5949232</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Let's hope the Mozilla guys already have a solution for this - this needs to be front and center in the next update if they don't. I'm guessing that this has been a hack for a while - actually kind of weird that this guy would make it public - he says he just wants links back to his site. As far as disabling JS goes, I use NoScript everyday, and I find the web very usable, I'm just not being used.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Chad</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 01 Jun 2007 13:36:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Spyjax: Your Browser History is Not Private!</title><link>http://mashable.com/2007/06/01/spyjax/#comment-5949231</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Like people would deactivate javascript because of this... like the web would be usable having javascript disabled.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Bas</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 01 Jun 2007 13:06:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Spyjax: Your Browser History is Not Private!</title><link>http://mashable.com/2007/06/01/spyjax/#comment-5949230</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Have you tried changing Firefox's configuration file to set browser.active_color, browser.anchor_color and browser.visited_color all to the same color?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Could that trick Spyjax?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Very evil either way.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Michel</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 01 Jun 2007 10:10:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Spyjax: Your Browser History is Not Private!</title><link>http://mashable.com/2007/06/01/spyjax/#comment-5949229</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Smart and worrisome concept. And if many people would disable their Javascript I would not get much analytical data from Google Analytics anymore for my website. Luckily I am also using &lt;a href="http://getclicky.com/6944" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://getclicky.com/6944"&gt;Clicky&lt;/a&gt; in parallel with GA and which also supports non-javascript analytics. But still quite distressful..&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Henri van den Hoof</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 01 Jun 2007 08:29:31 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>