<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Mashable - The Social Media Guide - Latest Comments in Text Link Ads Response to Google: ShoppingAds</title><link>http://mashable.disqus.com/</link><description>Internet and Technology News - Mashable is the world’s largest blog focused exclusively on Web 2.0 and Social Networking news. With more than 5 million monthly pageviews, Mashable is the most prolific blog reviewing new Web sites and services, publishing breaking news on what’s new on the web.</description><atom:link href="https://mashable.disqus.com/thread_94975/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 19:09:45 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Text Link Ads Response to Google: ShoppingAds</title><link>http://mashable.com/2007/10/30/text-link-ads-shopping-ads/#comment-5983561</link><description>&lt;p&gt;rlevah dnoxjl plzi&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Pornograpy</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 19:09:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Text Link Ads Response to Google: ShoppingAds</title><link>http://mashable.com/2007/10/30/text-link-ads-shopping-ads/#comment-5983560</link><description>&lt;p&gt;kybga yjso hfungkc iutw xhqui eodwc mjqo&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">yacmt clnziko</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2008 14:22:19 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Text Link Ads Response to Google: ShoppingAds</title><link>http://mashable.com/2007/10/30/text-link-ads-shopping-ads/#comment-5983558</link><description>&lt;p&gt;A week and a half later I'm pleased that our text link business is still going strong.  We've actually had record sales this last week.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Google "clamping down" on paid links really is having no effect on business.  Bring it on.  :-)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jonathan George</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2007 14:01:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Text Link Ads Response to Google: ShoppingAds</title><link>http://mashable.com/2007/10/30/text-link-ads-shopping-ads/#comment-5983557</link><description>&lt;p&gt;yes I felt myself.. My two sites using TLA are lowered in page rank...&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;one was 4page rank which is now 3 and second was 3 which is now 2 rank&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Google moto is  "do not evil"  lol...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">dotcommakers</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2007 05:09:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Text Link Ads Response to Google: ShoppingAds</title><link>http://mashable.com/2007/10/30/text-link-ads-shopping-ads/#comment-5983556</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I think that this recent action by Google will have a severe negative impact on TLA.  Most people buy the links solely for PageRank purposes.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Newest on the Net</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2007 22:18:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Text Link Ads Response to Google: ShoppingAds</title><link>http://mashable.com/2007/10/30/text-link-ads-shopping-ads/#comment-5983555</link><description>&lt;p&gt;If the main selling point of TLA is to boost your rank by buying text ads, and getting money for selling them, then why wouldn't it be a major issue for them?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Pete</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2007 19:12:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Text Link Ads Response to Google: ShoppingAds</title><link>http://mashable.com/2007/10/30/text-link-ads-shopping-ads/#comment-5983554</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I think it's affect should be significant but Shopping Ads should negate most of the effect it has on their bottom line.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Like it was said earlier, this has been in Beta for a while but it's still a very interesting service and (in my opinion) is more useful than AuctionAds for generating income on my sites.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Kris Karkoski</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2007 15:53:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Text Link Ads Response to Google: ShoppingAds</title><link>http://mashable.com/2007/10/30/text-link-ads-shopping-ads/#comment-5983553</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I have had very good success with these ads so far and the company president, Patrick, has been very helpful when I had questions on features, logging in, etc. Good service that's worth checking out.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Kris Karkoski</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2007 15:50:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Text Link Ads Response to Google: ShoppingAds</title><link>http://mashable.com/2007/10/30/text-link-ads-shopping-ads/#comment-5983551</link><description>&lt;p&gt;true Pete - but I doubt TLA's business will be severely affected - but it might take a hit.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">allen stern</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2007 15:42:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Text Link Ads Response to Google: ShoppingAds</title><link>http://mashable.com/2007/10/30/text-link-ads-shopping-ads/#comment-5983550</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Well, Google's change hardly started last week - Matt Cutts warned about it months back.  And TLA had concerns about Google tackling text links as early as the middle of last year.  Go look at ReviewMe and the way that fits into the picture.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Pete</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2007 15:37:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Text Link Ads Response to Google: ShoppingAds</title><link>http://mashable.com/2007/10/30/text-link-ads-shopping-ads/#comment-5983549</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hmmm,&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;This is so interesting. Google page ranks is not just about text ads site. Look at &lt;a href="http://techrunch.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="techrunch.com"&gt;techrunch.com&lt;/a&gt; It goes from PR 8 to PR 7 :)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">kikimodo</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2007 15:30:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Text Link Ads Response to Google: ShoppingAds</title><link>http://mashable.com/2007/10/30/text-link-ads-shopping-ads/#comment-5983548</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Uhm - they launched this close to a month ago to their customers in a quiet beta - I doubt it's due to last week's change. I also don't think this is an answer to Google - TLA and SA are completely different products - perhaps complements but not substitutes.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">allen stern</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2007 15:17:49 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>