<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Mashable - The Social Media Guide - Latest Comments in ZapZap Launches Digg for Podcasts</title><link>http://mashable.disqus.com/</link><description>Internet and Technology News - Mashable is the world’s largest blog focused exclusively on Web 2.0 and Social Networking news. With more than 5 million monthly pageviews, Mashable is the most prolific blog reviewing new Web sites and services, publishing breaking news on what’s new on the web.</description><atom:link href="https://mashable.disqus.com/thread_9424/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 28 Dec 2007 16:54:37 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: ZapZap Launches Digg for Podcasts</title><link>http://mashable.com/2006/06/26/zapzap-launches-digg-for-podcasts/#comment-5895439</link><description>&lt;p&gt;"By submitting this form you agree to our terms and conditions"&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I gotta disagree with you on some of this Pete.  I wrote a review of ZapZap this morning before reading yours, but I don't think that digg-style voting is going to be thought of as proprietary to digg.  It's a very logical function of the web and I think people will think of digg as an innovator that it only makes sense to follow in other fields.  On mainstream adoption, I think that many non early adopters are into podcast listening - but from their desktops instead of mp3 players.  ZapZap has a nice player and supports video too.  I think it'll be hard for them to differentiate themselves from other, similar services - but I do think they did a good job and have a shot.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">143</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 28 Dec 2007 16:54:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: ZapZap Launches Digg for Podcasts</title><link>http://mashable.com/2006/06/26/zapzap-launches-digg-for-podcasts/#comment-5895438</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I gotta disagree with you on some of this Pete.  I wrote a review of ZapZap this morning before reading yours, but I don't think that digg-style voting is going to be thought of as proprietary to digg.  It's a very logical function of the web and I think people will think of digg as an innovator that it only makes sense to follow in other fields.  On mainstream adoption, I think that many non early adopters are into podcast listening - but from their desktops instead of mp3 players.  ZapZap has a nice player and supports video too.  I think it'll be hard for them to differentiate themselves from other, similar services - but I do think they did a good job and have a shot.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Marshall Kirkpatrick</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 26 Jun 2006 13:30:32 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>