<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Mashable - The Social Media Guide - Latest Comments in StumbleUpon has 875,000 Users!</title><link>http://mashable.disqus.com/</link><description>Internet and Technology News - Mashable is the world’s largest blog focused exclusively on Web 2.0 and Social Networking news. With more than 5 million monthly pageviews, Mashable is the most prolific blog reviewing new Web sites and services, publishing breaking news on what’s new on the web.</description><atom:link href="https://mashable.disqus.com/thread_9393/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 20:48:00 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: StumbleUpon has 875,000 Users!</title><link>http://mashable.com/2006/05/16/stumbleupon-has-875000-users/#comment-7331054</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I am really amazed with your strategies, that's way I keep on following you.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Have a Great Day! :)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Trend Marketing Associates</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 20:48:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: StumbleUpon has 875,000 Users!</title><link>http://mashable.com/2006/05/16/stumbleupon-has-875000-users/#comment-6834649</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I really enjoyed the enlightenment on Stumble Upon. Great Info.&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.MaxGxlDreamTeam.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.MaxGxlDreamTeam.com"&gt;http://www.MaxGxlDreamTeam.com&lt;/a&gt; Owned by Three Billionaires.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">koj8</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 04:06:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: StumbleUpon has 875,000 Users!</title><link>http://mashable.com/2006/05/16/stumbleupon-has-875000-users/#comment-5893646</link><description>&lt;p&gt;jelousy,or just a mirror reaction?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">tomo</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2008 04:15:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: StumbleUpon has 875,000 Users!</title><link>http://mashable.com/2006/05/16/stumbleupon-has-875000-users/#comment-5893645</link><description>&lt;p&gt;thanks.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bilgi yarÄ±ÅŸmasÄ±</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2008 23:57:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: StumbleUpon has 875,000 Users!</title><link>http://mashable.com/2006/05/16/stumbleupon-has-875000-users/#comment-5893643</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I've uninstalled StumbleUpon; I can't stand the unreliability. Well, over the past two days it has been reliably un-obtainable.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Sextanta</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 27 Oct 2007 10:59:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: StumbleUpon has 875,000 Users!</title><link>http://mashable.com/2006/05/16/stumbleupon-has-875000-users/#comment-5893642</link><description>&lt;p&gt;thanks it s great job.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">gelisim</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 09 Sep 2007 11:25:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: StumbleUpon has 875,000 Users!</title><link>http://mashable.com/2006/05/16/stumbleupon-has-875000-users/#comment-5893641</link><description>&lt;p&gt;thank you&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">sebo</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 10 Aug 2007 05:57:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: StumbleUpon has 875,000 Users!</title><link>http://mashable.com/2006/05/16/stumbleupon-has-875000-users/#comment-5893640</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The fact that venture capitalists think Stumble is cool is enough of a reason to run for the hills. Not to mention the obvious "framing" issues and the fact that you can't actually see the url of the sites. Stumble sucks.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">outtanames</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 26 Sep 2006 03:14:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: StumbleUpon has 875,000 Users!</title><link>http://mashable.com/2006/05/16/stumbleupon-has-875000-users/#comment-5893639</link><description>&lt;p&gt;A really cool site to talk privately with ur best friends without the hassle of anyone peeking is &lt;a href="http://www.grupus.com/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.grupus.com/"&gt;Grupus.com&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;whats more u can even form public groups there but which are editable only by group members.&lt;br&gt;Pretty neat, eh?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Peter</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 18 Sep 2006 16:22:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: StumbleUpon has 875,000 Users!</title><link>http://mashable.com/2006/05/16/stumbleupon-has-875000-users/#comment-5893638</link><description>&lt;p&gt;With regards to the actual "Ads"... that is, sponsored stumbles, I see very very few of them... like out of 100 clicks of the stumble button, I MIGHT be directed to 1 or 2 sponsored stumbles... plus if you became a sponsor ($20 donation) you can avoid those altogether...&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Of course that doesn't stop you from seeing sites that other users have submitted, and annoyingly some users see SU as a way to promote their own stuff, either by submitting their own page or in one extreme case, adding the URL to every review they did....&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Idiots like that are in the minority, but SU has other problems... For one thing, if something is popular on the net, you will see it more than once, GUARANTEED... Someone will submit it, and then someone else will see the same thing on a different page and submit that.... and so on and so on.... the "Submitter" credits seem to be what some people are after.... so you will also find people who will submit damn near every page they go to... The good part is that through the thumbs up and down you weed these morons out (though not soon enough for me)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;SU is great for those brief idle moments when you want to see something interesting but don't wanna spend hours looking for cool stuff... but after being on the service for more than 2 years, I'm not as thrilled by it as I used to be...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">arleas</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 09 Aug 2006 16:28:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: StumbleUpon has 875,000 Users!</title><link>http://mashable.com/2006/05/16/stumbleupon-has-875000-users/#comment-5893637</link><description>&lt;p&gt;leandro, you can hide it (ctrl+F11)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">drg</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 06 Jul 2006 11:50:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: StumbleUpon has 875,000 Users!</title><link>http://mashable.com/2006/05/16/stumbleupon-has-875000-users/#comment-5893636</link><description>&lt;p&gt;It's really nice, but I don't like to install an entire toolbar in my browser, bc I just use the "I Like it" and "I don't like it".. I've removed it bc the space thing.. but its a great extension/service.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I could come back if I found another smaller extension or SU does a new lite version.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Leandro A.</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 05 Jun 2006 10:52:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: StumbleUpon has 875,000 Users!</title><link>http://mashable.com/2006/05/16/stumbleupon-has-875000-users/#comment-5893635</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I Love Stumble upon,its taken me to the neatest sites.its not a surprize to me that its so popular.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">mlw1980</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 27 May 2006 00:12:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: StumbleUpon has 875,000 Users!</title><link>http://mashable.com/2006/05/16/stumbleupon-has-875000-users/#comment-5893634</link><description>&lt;p&gt;StumbleUpon IS so addictive!  And it is inspiring smilar but different tools on the web.  You should check out the ranDUMBizer, it is like StumbleUpon, but has its own twist.  It is based on proprietary clustering technology from the Dumbfind search engine.  You can type in different sites that interest you and then search similar sites.  This way you are sure to get something random but directed towards what you specifically like.  It is very beta, but very cool.  Check it out!&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dumbfind.com/randumbizer/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.dumbfind.com/randumbizer/"&gt;http://www.dumbfind.com/ran...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">kt</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 24 May 2006 14:01:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: StumbleUpon has 875,000 Users!</title><link>http://mashable.com/2006/05/16/stumbleupon-has-875000-users/#comment-5893633</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Dude... YOU are the one who submits them. That's the whole point! Use the Thumbs Up/Down thingie. Then, all the other people who like what you like get that Stumble... repeat, refine, repeat...&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I've been an addict on this thing for 3 months now.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Do. Not. Start.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Trevor</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 18 May 2006 23:15:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: StumbleUpon has 875,000 Users!</title><link>http://mashable.com/2006/05/16/stumbleupon-has-875000-users/#comment-5893631</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Yeah but when you are skimming through YouTube videos you don't decide to stop and watch commercials, at least knowingly...no one is weirded out by the strange way advertising is injected? Guess it's a good service....&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">joey</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 18 May 2006 00:45:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: StumbleUpon has 875,000 Users!</title><link>http://mashable.com/2006/05/16/stumbleupon-has-875000-users/#comment-5893630</link><description>&lt;p&gt;officially launched? they have almost 1m users...WOW where did this freaking site come from.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ari Mir</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 17 May 2006 18:46:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: StumbleUpon has 875,000 Users!</title><link>http://mashable.com/2006/05/16/stumbleupon-has-875000-users/#comment-5893629</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks Rutger, *that* would explain it. So much for Alexa data pre-May.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">David G</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 17 May 2006 11:20:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: StumbleUpon has 875,000 Users!</title><link>http://mashable.com/2006/05/16/stumbleupon-has-875000-users/#comment-5893628</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Aston,&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I didn't try to imply that it's brand new - the original post that I linked to mentions 2002 as the start year.  This "launch" seems to be about positioning the site alongside the other 2.0 contenders.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;David,&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Yep - I 've noticed the step function on multiple sites during that period.  Rutger's hypothesis seems to hold.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;UPDATE&lt;/strong&gt; - StumbleUpon just updated their numbers to say that around 1/4 of users were active this week, rather than a 1/3 (see the Silicon Beat post).  Still impressive by anyone's standards.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Pete Cashmore</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 17 May 2006 08:30:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: StumbleUpon has 875,000 Users!</title><link>http://mashable.com/2006/05/16/stumbleupon-has-875000-users/#comment-5893627</link><description>&lt;p&gt;David, I think its the fact that Alexa started counting Firefox users in May... I checked other URLs that would be FF sensitive to test my hypothesis, and it seems to hold... Historically Alexa was only an IE-based gauge of traffic. Its hardly accurate as-is, but equally unfair to everyone.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I just poked around StumbleUpon, looks like FF is the 99% way that folks use the service, so, it's pretty friggin' insane that they have nearly 1m FF users "stumbling" (or whatever they do on there).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Decent piece of internet property... Kudos to Pete for bringing this to the limelight.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Rutger</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 17 May 2006 03:53:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: StumbleUpon has 875,000 Users!</title><link>http://mashable.com/2006/05/16/stumbleupon-has-875000-users/#comment-5893626</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Given that they have been around for a while, I am not surprised that they have this large community of users. Looks like they hung in there for the past few years and the Web 2.0 phenomenon hapenned and they are on the map along with other social bookmarking sites.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Yanamandra</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 17 May 2006 02:38:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: StumbleUpon has 875,000 Users!</title><link>http://mashable.com/2006/05/16/stumbleupon-has-875000-users/#comment-5893625</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Rutger - thanks for posting the graph - what do you think explains the step function in both curves in May?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">David G</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 16 May 2006 22:14:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: StumbleUpon has 875,000 Users!</title><link>http://mashable.com/2006/05/16/stumbleupon-has-875000-users/#comment-5893624</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Holy Hell, look at StumbleUpon in the Alexa rankings... I had no idea this thing was so big... It's not much smaller than &lt;a href="http://del.icio.us/yahoo" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="del.icio.us/yahoo"&gt;del.icio.us/yahoo&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Weird. Just shows the web is always bigger than we think.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.alexaholic.com/del.icio.us+stumbleupon.com?y=r&amp;amp;r=1y&amp;amp;z=1" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.alexaholic.com/del.icio.us+stumbleupon.com?y=r&amp;amp;r=1y&amp;amp;z=1"&gt;http://www.alexaholic.com/d...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Rutger</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 16 May 2006 19:16:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: StumbleUpon has 875,000 Users!</title><link>http://mashable.com/2006/05/16/stumbleupon-has-875000-users/#comment-5893623</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I've always wondered why those guys don't get as much press as the other Social Bookmarking apps. I found them pretty addictive too. Is it a firefox only tool? If so, that makes the figures even more impressive.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Paul O Mahony</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 16 May 2006 17:37:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: StumbleUpon has 875,000 Users!</title><link>http://mashable.com/2006/05/16/stumbleupon-has-875000-users/#comment-5893622</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Stumbleupon isn't nearly as new as is being implied. People (namely, almost all of those users) have been using it for a really long time. Back before web 2.0 was even a meme.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://Archive.org" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="Archive.org"&gt;Archive.org&lt;/a&gt; has pages (serving up info about the old Firefox plugin) from way back in 2002.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Aston</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 16 May 2006 17:14:14 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>