-
Website
http://mashable.com/ -
Original page
http://mashable.com/2006/05/16/stumbleupon-has-875000-users/ -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
Robert Basil
142 comments · 8 points
-
Jennifer Van Grove
149 comments · 23 points
-
r0cketman22
317 comments · 52 points
-
rajagiri4
160 comments · 2 points
-
barringtonarch
150 comments · 4 points
-
-
Popular Threads
-
Enter the Zappos Sharing Happiness $3,000 Shopping Spree Giveaway Contest
9 hours ago · 104 comments
-
Holiday Mojo: What Kind of Seasonal Twitter User Are You?
2 hours ago · 13 comments
-
Head to Head: Chrome for Mac vs. Chrome for Windows
5 hours ago · 20 comments
-
REVEALED: Details on YouTube’s VEVO Music Video Site
1 hour ago · 7 comments
-
Your Next Car Radio Might Be Pandora
8 hours ago · 31 comments
-
Enter the Zappos Sharing Happiness $3,000 Shopping Spree Giveaway Contest
288k active this week? hmmm not sure what to say about that. i hadn't seen it before this post (or hadn't bothered visiting prior to this).
sounds like the perfect tool to integrate into a social search engine...
It's generally far more social then the others, which may be the key to its appeal
Yeah, it reminds me of a number of old ideas that didn't pan out too well. It may be that the circumstances have changed enough to make these ideas more feasible now.
Archive.org has pages (serving up info about the old Firefox plugin) from way back in 2002.
Weird. Just shows the web is always bigger than we think.
http://www.alexaholic.com/del.icio.us+stumbleup...
I just poked around StumbleUpon, looks like FF is the 99% way that folks use the service, so, it's pretty friggin' insane that they have nearly 1m FF users "stumbling" (or whatever they do on there).
Decent piece of internet property... Kudos to Pete for bringing this to the limelight.
I didn't try to imply that it's brand new - the original post that I linked to mentions 2002 as the start year. This "launch" seems to be about positioning the site alongside the other 2.0 contenders.
David,
Yep - I 've noticed the step function on multiple sites during that period. Rutger's hypothesis seems to hold.
UPDATE - StumbleUpon just updated their numbers to say that around 1/4 of users were active this week, rather than a 1/3 (see the Silicon Beat post). Still impressive by anyone's standards.
I've been an addict on this thing for 3 months now.
Do. Not. Start.
http://www.dumbfind.com/randumbizer/
I could come back if I found another smaller extension or SU does a new lite version.
Of course that doesn't stop you from seeing sites that other users have submitted, and annoyingly some users see SU as a way to promote their own stuff, either by submitting their own page or in one extreme case, adding the URL to every review they did....
Idiots like that are in the minority, but SU has other problems... For one thing, if something is popular on the net, you will see it more than once, GUARANTEED... Someone will submit it, and then someone else will see the same thing on a different page and submit that.... and so on and so on.... the "Submitter" credits seem to be what some people are after.... so you will also find people who will submit damn near every page they go to... The good part is that through the thumbs up and down you weed these morons out (though not soon enough for me)
SU is great for those brief idle moments when you want to see something interesting but don't wanna spend hours looking for cool stuff... but after being on the service for more than 2 years, I'm not as thrilled by it as I used to be...
whats more u can even form public groups there but which are editable only by group members.
Pretty neat, eh?
http://www.MaxGxlDreamTeam.com Owned by Three Billionaires.
Have a Great Day! :)