<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Mashable - The Social Media Guide - Latest Comments in Mashable&amp;#8217;s 2008 Predictions: Adam&amp;#8217;s List</title><link>http://mashable.disqus.com/</link><description>Internet and Technology News - Mashable is the world’s largest blog focused exclusively on Web 2.0 and Social Networking news. With more than 5 million monthly pageviews, Mashable is the most prolific blog reviewing new Web sites and services, publishing breaking news on what’s new on the web.</description><atom:link href="https://mashable.disqus.com/thread_9387/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2008 12:32:56 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Mashable&amp;#8217;s 2008 Predictions: Adam&amp;#8217;s List</title><link>http://mashable.com/2007/12/25/adam-ostrow-2008-predictions/#comment-5991039</link><description>&lt;p&gt;spot on&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Foxy</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2008 12:32:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Mashable&amp;#8217;s 2008 Predictions: Adam&amp;#8217;s List</title><link>http://mashable.com/2007/12/25/adam-ostrow-2008-predictions/#comment-5991038</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Can't wait for 2008&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Thilo</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 25 Dec 2007 21:42:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Mashable&amp;#8217;s 2008 Predictions: Adam&amp;#8217;s List</title><link>http://mashable.com/2007/12/25/adam-ostrow-2008-predictions/#comment-5991037</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Your prediction of start-up consolidation is interesting. You see a lot of outright acquisitions, but it doesn't seem to happen w/ two competing start-ups much (if ever, really...cases?).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I'm curious about how investors (Angels, VCs) would look upon such mergers...how do bylaws/term sheets address such situations?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">batterista</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 25 Dec 2007 11:41:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Mashable&amp;#8217;s 2008 Predictions: Adam&amp;#8217;s List</title><link>http://mashable.com/2007/12/25/adam-ostrow-2008-predictions/#comment-5991035</link><description>&lt;p&gt;When you said&lt;br&gt;Are your parents on MySpace? Probably not. Are they on Facebook? Maybe.&lt;br&gt;I know many parents that even no about facebook but they all know about myspace. I think myspace has more old people then young people on it. Facebook has a lot of people that are in college and younger. I know so many moms and dads that are myspace my mom don't even know what facebook is.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Travis</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 25 Dec 2007 02:28:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Mashable&amp;#8217;s 2008 Predictions: Adam&amp;#8217;s List</title><link>http://mashable.com/2007/12/25/adam-ostrow-2008-predictions/#comment-5991034</link><description>&lt;p&gt;You can probably agree that LinkedIn is dominating the business networking sector. There are other competitors in the same space, such as primarily-European XING and Ryze. All of them have a Free account version, and all of them have "premium" plans. LinkedIn gives a lot of freedom for its free users to use its service, backed by advertising. In my experience with the other sites - not so much.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I can't speak for XING as I'm not in Europe - but none of these competitors in my experience have as large of a userbase as LinkedIn - and for a professional networking site, that is absolutely crucial. Two-thirds of the people I network with in real life are on LinkedIn. Plaxo, a "revived" competitor, doesn't have the userbase either.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Unless the other competitors with similar features have some kind of ingenious way to gain many users, LinkedIn will remain at the top. The userbase is important, and even more so in professional networking sites.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steven Bao</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 24 Dec 2007 23:44:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Mashable&amp;#8217;s 2008 Predictions: Adam&amp;#8217;s List</title><link>http://mashable.com/2007/12/25/adam-ostrow-2008-predictions/#comment-5991033</link><description>&lt;p&gt;It think you're spot on. I do wish your predictions had a centricity geared more towards emerging technologies rather than acquisitions and the paths the biggest companies take...What technologies will take off this year (aside from mobile)? What new technologies will appear? What are going to be the new innovative things dabbled in (even if they don't take off) this year???&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">James Gillmore</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 24 Dec 2007 23:36:48 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>