<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Mashable - The Social Media Guide - Latest Comments in Do What Twitter Can&amp;#8217;t: Cash In On Your Twitter Stream</title><link>http://mashable.disqus.com/</link><description>Internet and Technology News - Mashable is the world’s largest blog focused exclusively on Web 2.0 and Social Networking news. With more than 5 million monthly pageviews, Mashable is the most prolific blog reviewing new Web sites and services, publishing breaking news on what’s new on the web.</description><atom:link href="https://mashable.disqus.com/thread_89279/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 15:06:25 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Do What Twitter Can&amp;#8217;t: Cash In On Your Twitter Stream</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/01/23/adcause/#comment-13549627</link><description>&lt;p&gt;excellent! Bon Chance! Let me know if you would like direct access to the insider (decision makers) for major brands, OK? Thank you for this interesting post! *blush* this came in today  from  @SingleEdition  “I did not believe it when you told me 6 months ago that AdDataExpress® would change my life, but, boy were you ever right!!!! “ &lt;a href="http://www.twitter.com/SingleEdition" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="www.twitter.com/SingleEdition"&gt;www.twitter.com/SingleEdition&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">arthurbarbato</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 15:06:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Do What Twitter Can&amp;#8217;t: Cash In On Your Twitter Stream</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/01/23/adcause/#comment-8257883</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I think it is overwhelming from your readers that the advertising is not going to work on &lt;a href="http://Twitter.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="Twitter.com"&gt;Twitter.com&lt;/a&gt;  I was kind interested.  I have worked hard to get my followers and would like not to offend them with advertising.  &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">AmorMD</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 08:36:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Do What Twitter Can&amp;#8217;t: Cash In On Your Twitter Stream</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/01/23/adcause/#comment-6039000</link><description>&lt;p&gt;populating your follower's timeline with ads so that you get paid! Spamming it is called.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Devakishor</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 13:32:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Do What Twitter Can&amp;#8217;t: Cash In On Your Twitter Stream</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/01/23/adcause/#comment-6038999</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Isn't this just what Twitteriffic did with their desktop client... some people hated it, but to others it was just a odd tweet every hour or so that you just ignored.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I wonder how much money they make out of that?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Nigel Derbyshire</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 17:21:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Do What Twitter Can&amp;#8217;t: Cash In On Your Twitter Stream</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/01/23/adcause/#comment-6038998</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I know the economy is tough, but I'd feel a bit like a sell-out to showcase ads to my followers.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jennifer Dlugozima</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 26 Jan 2009 15:40:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Do What Twitter Can&amp;#8217;t: Cash In On Your Twitter Stream</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/01/23/adcause/#comment-6038997</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I think this is a great idea. While it's usually easy to figure out who isn't worth following, encouraging them to include ads in their Twitter stream vastly simplifies the process. Although it would be slightly easier if they used "spam_" as a prefix in their Twitter ids.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Still, I don't think they take the idea far enough. Ben Kunz proposed a more general approach: &lt;a href="http://thenoisychannel.com/2008/12/30/reductio-ad-advertorium/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://thenoisychannel.com/2008/12/30/reductio-ad-advertorium/"&gt;http://thenoisychannel.com/...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Daniel Tunkelang</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 25 Jan 2009 00:04:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Do What Twitter Can&amp;#8217;t: Cash In On Your Twitter Stream</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/01/23/adcause/#comment-6038996</link><description>&lt;p&gt;adCause has been added to Twitdom - The Twitter Applications Database.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anuj Seth - Twitdom</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 24 Jan 2009 09:46:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Do What Twitter Can&amp;#8217;t: Cash In On Your Twitter Stream</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/01/23/adcause/#comment-6038994</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hey!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;It's kinda awkward to put in advertisments, it's something like you talk with some friend of yours and tell him "oh btw, I think you should buy this it would be really useful to you" and then you check in. The funny thing is that you say that every 5 phrases :))&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ciprian Pantea</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 24 Jan 2009 04:09:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Do What Twitter Can&amp;#8217;t: Cash In On Your Twitter Stream</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/01/23/adcause/#comment-6038993</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I just signed up one of my niche Twitter accounts. I'm interested in seeing what kind of "ads" I'd be asked to promote in my timeline; and I'm interested to see what kind of response, including getting unfollowed, it will get from my followers.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I agree that there is huge potential for abuse. On the other hand, if it's a fairly innocuous promotion of a product or service that I can get behind and that would be useful to folks in that niche, I don't see the harm.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I don't know a thing about MagPie so I have no basis for comparison. For my part, I'm kind of excited to be in at the get-go and to be able to carefully test response. After all, my business is Internet Marketing; I think AdCause could be a cool tool, if used properly. Time will tell. ;-)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Phoebe</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 24 Jan 2009 01:39:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Do What Twitter Can&amp;#8217;t: Cash In On Your Twitter Stream</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/01/23/adcause/#comment-6038992</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Sounds like the same effect of television commercials. &lt;br&gt;I bet this company already has software to sift out those ads and will sell that to the masses quickly after this takes flight :)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jason Lee</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 24 Jan 2009 01:33:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Do What Twitter Can&amp;#8217;t: Cash In On Your Twitter Stream</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/01/23/adcause/#comment-6038990</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I'd prefer Google-style Twitter AdSense.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Igor Poltavskiy</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2009 23:08:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Do What Twitter Can&amp;#8217;t: Cash In On Your Twitter Stream</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/01/23/adcause/#comment-6038988</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I am going to add this to twtbase! (&lt;a href="http://www.twtbase.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.twtbase.com"&gt;http://www.twtbase.com&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Zachary Collins</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2009 21:41:19 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Do What Twitter Can&amp;#8217;t: Cash In On Your Twitter Stream</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/01/23/adcause/#comment-6038987</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I remember a local company here called PayPerPost that received a lot of backlash for creating a paid blogging platform. I'm not sure how they are doing now though...&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I follow a number of brands and expect them to hype their own stuff. For people like me who use their Twitter account for both personal and business use, I expect tweets about their company and products/services. For those who have a record of not doing any of that, if I start seeing ads in their Twitter stream, I'll unfollow them.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Robert Dempsey</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2009 21:19:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Do What Twitter Can&amp;#8217;t: Cash In On Your Twitter Stream</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/01/23/adcause/#comment-6038986</link><description>&lt;p&gt;An intriguing idea, but before I'd do it, I'd need a greater frequency range for ads, I don't want 5% of my tweets to be an ad.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Shawn K</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2009 19:19:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Do What Twitter Can&amp;#8217;t: Cash In On Your Twitter Stream</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/01/23/adcause/#comment-6038985</link><description>&lt;p&gt;From what I've seen on Twitter in my few months tweeting, there would be nothing but ads flowing across my screen. I don't think it's a good idea.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Bruce E.</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2009 19:08:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Do What Twitter Can&amp;#8217;t: Cash In On Your Twitter Stream</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/01/23/adcause/#comment-6038984</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Whatâ€™s always been interesting to me about Twitter is that itâ€™s both a broadcasting medium (like tv, radio, the web itself) and a conversational tool. Advertising is perfectly accepted in the first case, not at all in the second. Once scenario is that people will begin to have 2 twitter profiles/tweetstreams, one for â€œworkâ€ and one for â€œplayâ€. The work one will be more informational, with links to found content and useful advice. People will allow ads on that, and â€œworkâ€ to keep the ads and content relevant. The play version of their profile will be used more for conversations, social interactions and fun stuff -- and will not include ads.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;PS There has *always* been an outcry the first time advertising is incorporated someplace new.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Lisa Hickey</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2009 18:33:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Do What Twitter Can&amp;#8217;t: Cash In On Your Twitter Stream</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/01/23/adcause/#comment-6038983</link><description>&lt;p&gt;You think there are too many Fail Whale issues now? Wait until multiple people are creating multiple accounts to try and make a quick dollar. Although the idea may be good there needs to be a more creative way to do something like this.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Kim Randall</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2009 18:10:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Do What Twitter Can&amp;#8217;t: Cash In On Your Twitter Stream</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/01/23/adcause/#comment-6038982</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Someone must create a twitter app that can recognize when ppl are using adCause like services and have it auto block every 5th tweet or 20th...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Marc</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2009 17:43:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Do What Twitter Can&amp;#8217;t: Cash In On Your Twitter Stream</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/01/23/adcause/#comment-6038981</link><description>&lt;p&gt;First thing I thought, Wow, way to lose your followers.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Deborah</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2009 17:33:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Do What Twitter Can&amp;#8217;t: Cash In On Your Twitter Stream</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/01/23/adcause/#comment-6038979</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Shawn..LOL. Wow creative folks over at AdCause! This model is doomed.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Tim R.</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2009 16:30:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Do What Twitter Can&amp;#8217;t: Cash In On Your Twitter Stream</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/01/23/adcause/#comment-6038978</link><description>&lt;p&gt;What a RIP OFF of &lt;a href="http://crowdspring.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="crowdspring.com"&gt;crowdspring.com&lt;/a&gt; design. At least change the colors or something. hahaaa!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Shawn N.</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2009 16:27:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Do What Twitter Can&amp;#8217;t: Cash In On Your Twitter Stream</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/01/23/adcause/#comment-6038977</link><description>&lt;p&gt;This is reason #5,100 why Twitter needs to have developers apply for access to the API.  This might be the dumbest ad model of all (out of Magpie, Twittad, AdCause). The pricing sructure doesnt make sense, like other posters have said; does the Tweet come across as just another Tweet or is it clearly an ad, ala #magpie.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Twitter needs to put a stop to all these ad ideas and either throw their support behind one and improve it, or wait until they all die.  Either way the ads in tweets is a epic #fail IMO&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Tim R.</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2009 16:20:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Do What Twitter Can&amp;#8217;t: Cash In On Your Twitter Stream</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/01/23/adcause/#comment-6038976</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hey, this is perfect. I was just thinking 'wouldnt it be nice if there was a way I could drive away all my twitter followers' and here we go, the perfect solution!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Rajio</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2009 16:17:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Do What Twitter Can&amp;#8217;t: Cash In On Your Twitter Stream</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/01/23/adcause/#comment-6038975</link><description>&lt;p&gt;So if MagPie would have launched with a "give to a cause" option then this idea would have not even been thought of.  Everyone on Twitter knows that ads in tweets is not the answer.  How are these tweets being displayed?  Is there a notification that this is a AD TWEET?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Advertisers FLOCKED away from MagPie the second they saw the negative feedback.  I dont care if you throw in the worlds greatest charities..if those charities find out about this idea, and know that the Twitter community doesnt like ads in Tweets.  That charity will exit stage left.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I give it 2 months. Tops. If the bugs dont take it down sooner.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Marcus</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2009 16:01:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Do What Twitter Can&amp;#8217;t: Cash In On Your Twitter Stream</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/01/23/adcause/#comment-6038974</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I do agree with a couple of the comments above that I would feel slightly like a sell out, but...&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I also put my twitter stream onto my website. So my most recent tweet will show up on the frontpage of my website. If I could include those ads only within that - then that would make a bit more sense to me.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;It wouldn't annoy my followers and it would be in a place where an ad would probably be more 'acceptable'.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jen</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2009 16:00:55 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>