<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Mashable - The Social Media Guide - Latest Comments in iLike and TuneCore Monetization Music to Artists&amp;#8217; Ears</title><link>http://mashable.disqus.com/</link><description>Internet and Technology News - Mashable is the world’s largest blog focused exclusively on Web 2.0 and Social Networking news. With more than 5 million monthly pageviews, Mashable is the most prolific blog reviewing new Web sites and services, publishing breaking news on what’s new on the web.</description><atom:link href="https://mashable.disqus.com/thread_87196/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Dec 2008 11:00:16 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: iLike and TuneCore Monetization Music to Artists&amp;#8217; Ears</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/10/19/ilike-tunecore/#comment-6023393</link><description>&lt;p&gt;cool man, i will check routenote out. what are your position on UPC codes? do you sell them?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">james connoly</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 09 Dec 2008 11:00:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: iLike and TuneCore Monetization Music to Artists&amp;#8217; Ears</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/10/19/ilike-tunecore/#comment-6023391</link><description>&lt;p&gt;i like what tunecore are doing, and ilike is great. The only thing i dont like is its pricing structure, startup fee? maintenence costs? paying extra for each music shop i want to upload to? i dunno, as an independent artist i dont like overheads or paying more than i need to. My friends told me about a new start up called Record Union, i think i will wait until they are up and running before i decide who i will use to distribute my music. It is a good move for Tunecore though, until now they havent done anything to sure the tracks they distribute actually sell.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">james connoly</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 09 Dec 2008 08:13:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: iLike and TuneCore Monetization Music to Artists&amp;#8217; Ears</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/10/19/ilike-tunecore/#comment-6023390</link><description>&lt;p&gt;As co-founder of iLike, I'm responding to Jeremy F's comment.  First, I'm flattered that our 2-yr-old startup is considered by anybody to be a "monster" :)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Jeremy said two incorrect statements:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;1. NOT TRUE: iLike "limits music fans to 30-sec clips."  In fact, you can play any song in its entirety, without registering or anything; just click play and listen.  After you've exhausted a monthly quote of 25 songs, it gets reduced to 30-sec clips; you can then pay for Rhapsody, or you can wait till the end of the month and your quota of 25-free is reset.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;2. NOT TRUE: iLike "doesn't even pay a dime to indie Artists." That was true before, but the Tunecore deal fixes exactly that!  Now indie artists have a choice: they can upload their music to be streamed royalty-free without limits; or they can submit it to Rhapsody via Tunecore and get paid $0.01/play every time their song is streamed on iLike.  There are benefits to either choice, and we let the artist decide.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Ali&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;ps. I am a fan of Jeff Price and his outspoken support of the indie spirit.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ali Partovi</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2008 12:02:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: iLike and TuneCore Monetization Music to Artists&amp;#8217; Ears</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/10/19/ilike-tunecore/#comment-6023389</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I really canâ€™t believe that Tunecoreâ€™s outspoken leader, Jeff Price, would actually be supporting a company like the iLike/Ticketmatser/Rhapsody monster, which limits music fans to 30-second clips, sells recommendation placement to major labels, and pushes Ticketmaster and their draconian fees on all of its users. When it comes to being â€˜the manâ€™, iLike comes in a close second to MySpace Music (last I checked, iLike doesnâ€™t even pay a dime to indie Artists when their music is streamed).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Clearly a flat-fee distribution model means that Tunecore needs tens of thousands of customers to make a viable business (and will pay iLike a nice kickback for each and every one they can bring onboard), but have times become so bad in the music business that even a crazed indie music fanatic like Price would sell out? Gee whiz.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">jeremy f</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2008 02:38:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: iLike and TuneCore Monetization Music to Artists&amp;#8217; Ears</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/10/19/ilike-tunecore/#comment-6023388</link><description>&lt;p&gt;This is an interesting more, but I still dont see how it is big news. &lt;a href="http://routenote.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://routenote.com"&gt;http://routenote.com&lt;/a&gt; has been developing these music distribution partners in recent months also.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steven Finch</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 20 Oct 2008 15:14:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: iLike and TuneCore Monetization Music to Artists&amp;#8217; Ears</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/10/19/ilike-tunecore/#comment-6023387</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Pretty interesting&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Marie Goltara</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 20 Oct 2008 13:55:50 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>