<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Mashable - The Social Media Guide - Latest Comments in No Sex in Lively? Yeah, Right!</title><link>http://mashable.disqus.com/</link><description>Internet and Technology News - Mashable is the world’s largest blog focused exclusively on Web 2.0 and Social Networking news. With more than 5 million monthly pageviews, Mashable is the most prolific blog reviewing new Web sites and services, publishing breaking news on what’s new on the web.</description><atom:link href="https://mashable.disqus.com/thread_8650/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2009 14:54:44 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: No Sex in Lively? Yeah, Right!</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/07/10/lively-sex/#comment-15895395</link><description>&lt;p&gt;NEW EXOTIC DANCERS ANTHEM &lt;br&gt;"NO SEX IN THE CHAMPAGNE ROOM" 2009!! BY CHYNAH DOLL, &lt;br&gt;DOWNLOAD TODAY WWW.ITUNES.COM/CHYNAHDOLL&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">CHYNAH DOLL</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2009 14:54:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: No Sex in Lively? Yeah, Right!</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/07/10/lively-sex/#comment-6010613</link><description>&lt;p&gt;This thing is ridiculous. It takes forever to load, when it does load its ugly and laggy. Is lively code for jumpy and irritating?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">brad</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 11 Jul 2008 11:01:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: No Sex in Lively? Yeah, Right!</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/07/10/lively-sex/#comment-6010611</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Obviously Google just discovered another viable business niche. Someone should immediately develop technology for creating virtual sex rooms - the market for this has just been proven ;) Or maybe there are already services like that, but they just didn't hit mainstream the way Google has?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Marcin Grodzicki</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 11 Jul 2008 06:05:19 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: No Sex in Lively? Yeah, Right!</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/07/10/lively-sex/#comment-6010610</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Not to be obnoxious, but why make a video instead of writing a comment? it took you 25 secs to make one point that would have taken 2 secs to read. You're not showing anything, just talking.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">spongefile</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 11 Jul 2008 05:29:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: No Sex in Lively? Yeah, Right!</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/07/10/lively-sex/#comment-6010609</link><description>&lt;p&gt;As per my last article which is positive on Lively, I noticed the R rooms within hours...this is the first photo I've seen...it will be interesting to see how the situation is managed.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">penandpic</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 23:58:44 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>