<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Mashable - The Social Media Guide - Latest Comments in YouTVPC and Peekvid Being Sued for Providing Access to Illicit Video Content</title><link>http://mashable.disqus.com/</link><description>Internet and Technology News - Mashable is the world’s largest blog focused exclusively on Web 2.0 and Social Networking news. With more than 5 million monthly pageviews, Mashable is the most prolific blog reviewing new Web sites and services, publishing breaking news on what’s new on the web.</description><atom:link href="https://mashable.disqus.com/thread_8415/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 12:13:41 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: YouTVPC and Peekvid Being Sued for Providing Access to Illicit Video Content</title><link>http://mashable.com/2007/06/27/youtvpc-peekvid-mpaa/#comment-8778302</link><description>&lt;p&gt;So this is like a complex network tightly connected in order to function and make profits. Unfortunately providing illicit material is not the way to make profits, they should have known better. If I were YouTVPC and Peekvid I would get ready to place a &lt;a href="http://www.smartrules.com/rules/Leave-to-File-Cross-Complaint-Oppositions/ " rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.smartrules.com/rules/Leave-to-File-Cross-Complaint-Oppositions/ "&gt;motion for leave to file cross-complaint&lt;/a&gt;. This trial won't be easy... &lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">kallie</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 12:13:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: YouTVPC and Peekvid Being Sued for Providing Access to Illicit Video Content</title><link>http://mashable.com/2007/06/27/youtvpc-peekvid-mpaa/#comment-5953035</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I use &lt;a href="http://www.femalebymale.net" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.femalebymale.net"&gt;http://www.femalebymale.net&lt;/a&gt; is better&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Parceiros para Sexo</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 11 Aug 2007 06:44:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: YouTVPC and Peekvid Being Sued for Providing Access to Illicit Video Content</title><link>http://mashable.com/2007/06/27/youtvpc-peekvid-mpaa/#comment-5953034</link><description>&lt;p&gt;â€œPeekvid is committed to an industry solution that will provide a mechanism to compensate artists that create the work you enjoy watching. Peekvid would like to be part of the long term solution.â€&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Is it nice to see they are taking all the cash from their intrusive advertising and not sharing it with the content producers:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;This linking issue has been going on for a while and there is a BIG difference in what Peekvid do compared to Google which makes one legal and the other illegal. Its explained here:&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.webtvwire.com/peekvid-to-get-sued-to-oblivion-mpaa-files-lawsuit-future-is-grim/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.webtvwire.com/peekvid-to-get-sued-to-oblivion-mpaa-files-lawsuit-future-is-grim/"&gt;http://www.webtvwire.com/pe...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Chris Tew</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 03 Jul 2007 09:15:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: YouTVPC and Peekvid Being Sued for Providing Access to Illicit Video Content</title><link>http://mashable.com/2007/06/27/youtvpc-peekvid-mpaa/#comment-5953033</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Wow, how can that be enforced if companies are held liable by simply linking to copyrighted content?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;If so, then there are hundreds of other sites that can also held liable for direct linking/embedding to 'illegal content'&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Very interested to see how this plays out because it definitely impacts everyone. I don't understand how the MPAA can expect this to be successful when the companies they are going after don't even host the content in question.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">LonelyBloggers</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 28 Jun 2007 09:23:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: YouTVPC and Peekvid Being Sued for Providing Access to Illicit Video Content</title><link>http://mashable.com/2007/06/27/youtvpc-peekvid-mpaa/#comment-5953032</link><description>&lt;p&gt;It's an interesting case, and the question "where does the liability stop" is very important. If I have a meta-index linking to sites like PeekVid and YouTVPC and the 100s of others, am I also viewed to be "prospering from illicit material"? Does Mashable's recent page of links do so too? It's pretty hard to draw the line - but I think consensus is, the line should be where the content is hosted.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Be interesting to see how it pans out...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">sean fear</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 28 Jun 2007 08:49:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: YouTVPC and Peekvid Being Sued for Providing Access to Illicit Video Content</title><link>http://mashable.com/2007/06/27/youtvpc-peekvid-mpaa/#comment-5953031</link><description>&lt;p&gt;If such was the case, a LOT of sites can be sued. The movie group just wants to make $ in any way possible.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">mark</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 28 Jun 2007 03:07:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: YouTVPC and Peekvid Being Sued for Providing Access to Illicit Video Content</title><link>http://mashable.com/2007/06/27/youtvpc-peekvid-mpaa/#comment-5953030</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I kinda wondered when PeekVid would go down (or get sued at least). They really do have a nice assortment of copyrighted works available. Though I still say this whole "copyright" issue isn't the real issue: it's all about controlling distribution in my mind.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Distribution is worth more than some dumb copyright. A hamster tastes like chicken in case your desperate for food.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Keith Shepard</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 27 Jun 2007 22:03:17 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>