-
Website
http://mashable.com/ -
Original page
http://mashable.com/2008/01/13/university-of-brighton-professor-places-ban-on-google-and-wikipedia/ -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
Robert Basil
142 comments · 8 points
-
Jennifer Van Grove
149 comments · 23 points
-
r0cketman22
317 comments · 52 points
-
rajagiri4
160 comments · 2 points
-
barringtonarch
150 comments · 4 points
-
-
Popular Threads
-
Enter the Zappos Sharing Happiness $3,000 Shopping Spree Giveaway Contest
5 hours ago · 94 comments
-
Head to Head: Chrome for Mac vs. Chrome for Windows
1 hour ago · 7 comments
-
iPhone App Offers Instant Speech-to-Text Transcription
3 hours ago · 17 comments
-
Your Next Car Radio Might Be Pandora
4 hours ago · 21 comments
-
Google Launches Chrome for Mac
6 hours ago · 28 comments
-
Enter the Zappos Sharing Happiness $3,000 Shopping Spree Giveaway Contest
So, why complaining about that? Those sites wont be the resources of the best students.
At a guess, the rationale for the banning is that neither Wikipedia nor Google should be relied on as ways to uncover high quality acadmic research: library-specific subject databases almost always return better and more focused results. Increasingly, however, students are depending on Wikipedia as a primary source! Hint: you don't even use physical book encyclopaedias as primary sources for academic papers.
I'd assume Tara simply doesn't want to see those sources in a student's bibliography. If a student ignores this injunction and perhaps uses material from Wikipedia without correct attribution, well, they'd then be guilty of plagiarism.
Mix and match people.
Websalad is very funny.
- Content is not made equal. In the case of Google, brand equity and search rankings can significantly mislead a student who doesn't demonstrate discernment.
- Wikipedia is great for primers. I would hope that the expectations of a college professor are such that a data dump does not pass for analysis and critical thought.
- There is software widely used by educators that searches sentences from students' papers and matches it with whatever's on the web. Maybe one aspect of higher education that requires some more attention is the stricter implementation of proper citation and professors using their TA's to really check up on the students they suspect.
Bottom line, instead of raising walls, raise the bar.
The reason is simple: anyone can google. It does not create new thoughts, nor for you, nor for anybody else. It does not mean valuable work at your side.
It's not google that should be banned: it's the student who should be banned (from the course, not from the uni), when using a top10 google result as a homework's only base material. And I think that's fine even in 2008.
I'm not surprised that it is an issue, but if the work being produced isn't good enough then perhaps the students need to be taught how to do good research (a balance between traditional and new). If the work being produced still doesn't produce results then perhaps the students don't belong there (and should fail the course!).
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tara_Brabazon
hello professor
i am student master computer of iran
i am trying find a good subject for final project (thesis) . in area "Search Engine" in Data mining and i dont have much time.(data maninh is little essential)
do you help me for finding theze?
i want work on subject "Query Refinement with personalized back end in Search engines"
do you think be good?
please help me if you can
if you have a subject please say me I am very thankful OR introduce one person that work this area
thank you
Atoosa Dahbashi