-
Website
http://mashable.com/ -
Original page
http://mashable.com/2007/09/15/blogrush/ -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
Robert Basil
142 comments · 8 points
-
Jennifer Van Grove
149 comments · 23 points
-
r0cketman22
317 comments · 52 points
-
rajagiri4
160 comments · 2 points
-
barringtonarch
150 comments · 4 points
-
-
Popular Threads
-
Enter the Zappos Sharing Happiness $3,000 Shopping Spree Giveaway Contest
4 hours ago · 89 comments
-
iPhone App Offers Instant Speech-to-Text Transcription
2 hours ago · 16 comments
-
Your Next Car Radio Might Be Pandora
3 hours ago · 21 comments
-
Google Launches Chrome for Mac
5 hours ago · 27 comments
-
BREAKING: Google Launches Real-Time Search Results
1 day ago · 96 comments
-
Enter the Zappos Sharing Happiness $3,000 Shopping Spree Giveaway Contest
That coupled with the idea of "everybody benefiting" by spreading traffic is a smart platform.
I like this and am keen to watch it develop.
I had similar views though, for sure.
Pyramid scheme? How on earth is our service is a pyramid scheme? There's nothing for sale or any money changing hands. If a user doesn't ever end up with a referral then they get syndication for their posts everyday that's equal to the impressions of the widget.
BlogRush was designed as a "Cooperative Syndication Network" because unlike all the other massively viral services in Internet history where the users get very little benefit from helping "spread the word" and usage of the service, BlogRush rewards its users with additional syndication through many generations of referrals because 'technically' the network might have never had someone 5 or 6 referrals "away" if it wasn't for that original person that started the word-of-mouth activity in the first place. So our system was designed to reward everyone in the network for ANY referral activity that they are responsible for. Our system is also one of the only systems ever created to truly allow massive leverage for a blog of ANY size to generate massive distribution for their content.
I think it's a bit unfair to compare BlogRush to the old traffic exchanges. This isn't about having people surf random web sites just to have untargeted random people surf their web sites in return. This isn't about being incentivized to click links and visit sites. This is about delivering RELEVANT CONTENT to your blog to provide blog visitors with more VALUE and additional resources while at the same time help that blog receive potentially broad syndication for the content.
Our sole focus is to help our users drive more TARGETED visitors to their blog so they can grow their readership. How much more targeted can you get that sending traffic from relevant blogs?
Thanks for listening. :)
John Reese
I've installed the tool in several of my own blogs and there's absolutely nothing "scammy" about it. I am waiting for some of the functionality in the member's area to be activated (reporting tools, help section, etc ...), but so far it looks like a terrific little program and very easy to set up.
Well done John!
If that's a 1:1 traffic exchange, how come my site's articles aren't being show to others - your own BlogRush dashboard panel - says "Credits Earned Today: 69" but gives no indication of how much traffic your sending me - which I presume to be nothing.
1.) Stats don't work. You want to me to refer people to you, but you can't tell me if my tracking link even works at all.
2.) Widget shows basically the same blogs over and over again.
3.) These blogs DON'T EVEN HAVE THE WIDGET ON THEM.
If no one puts the widget on their, then no one is
going to receive any traffic.
4.) Click throughs on this type thing are normally
few to none.
5.) If people do place the widget on the site, it
will probably be at the bottom of the bottom of
the blog where no one will see it.
6.) Why launch the product if the system is not
even ready. In my opinion very unprofessional
and certainly not something I would want to be
involved with.
Yes, I signed up just to be courious. Now I'm
just waiting to get spammed from my signup.
Certainly not new!!! or Revolutionary!
Anyone hear of BlogExplosion?
http://www.blogexplosion.com
Anyway, my 2 cents.
Danny
there is no money exchanged. So how could it be a pyramid scheme. Some People call network marketing a pyramid scheme but then there mother buys avon and thats network marketing Just my 2 cents.
Pete Balasch Jr.
BTW, thanks John for the email describing how the credit system works. I've added that to my post about BlogRush.
Once it gets off the ground (we're only in the first few days don't forget) then we'll all be the judges of how effective it is or not - the stats don't lie!
If I become disenchanted I'll just remove it from my blogs - eerm so what's the problem? I don't remember paying this guy anything.
Sure I can see that if the widget sits on a few million blogs and each widget occasionally, or more than occasionally, has a 'Make Money Online' type link on it - which is how, as I understand it, Mr Reese is going to monetize this (and why not?) that's OK too.
If you don't like it don't use it. If uncertain then use it for a while and delete it if you get a bad vibe or just say what the heck and just use it anyway - who cares?
But for cripes sake don't make it out to be some MLM/pyramid marketing scam that is just plain oafish.
Brandon Watts
Criteo Evangelist
but I will also be doing a post in a couple of days explaining exactly why this will not be a success.
I have visited several blogs, clicked on the blog rush links, and the content on a significant number of sites has been less than compelling. For instance, one site was brand new and had one post telling you how to make money online. The method? Click on this link and be taken to one of the rotating "make money online" schemes from the bloggers script. Is that "relevant content?"
One question. Google is all about relevant content, and if this widget gets the reputation as being irrelevant or "spammy", could Google end up punishing your blog and page rank for carrying it?
Food for thought, standing by to see how it all works out.
Tony Lee
TheGoodBlogs
http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/423910...
BlogRush accepted a lot of members and got them to promote their service. And how did BlogRush repay them? They deactivated their blogs and removed them from the system.
They did this to over 10,000 people just this weekend.
I can see sites not accepting a submision. But don't accept someone's submission, get them to promote your site, and then turn around and screw them over.
They cut 10,000 blogs and gave no reason.
It’s like wearing a patch on your shirt that says “blogrush†and then one day, they come along and tear the patch off your shirt and say “Your shirt is not good enough to have this patch on it.â€
Who made them the judge and jury for what is a good blog and what is not-so-good.
I'm on the edge of rippin' the patch off myself!
Well its only recently that I started to build it up again. I am very disappointed in Blogrush a program I thought was going to be good.
But now looks to be just another internet scam.
After reading this post and the reply by the software developer himself (John Reese) I think the use of "pyramid scheme" was really just a clever way of creating controversy in the title to attract readers
*********** quote **********
So being offensive, and accusing someone of an illegal and immoral activity is "clever"? I think not. Using inflammatory, derogatory, accusatory language is not the sign of a "clever" mind; it's a sign of weak thinking.
I find it funny that some here complain that they don't meet the terms of service, get dropped, and think the service is "bad" because they abide by the rules. Unreal.
As it turns out, if you did your homework and followed the story of BlogRush, that it was a pyramid scheme. Not all economies involve money - this is an economy of attention they're dealing with, and an economy that is doomed to bankruptcy. Almost no-one recieved what they were promised.
What they were promised was a rush of traffic to their blog. Even those at the top of the scheme only recieved a moderate flow - most recieved a trickle.
Akhil Khatri
http://hrreview.blogspot.com