<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Mashable - The Social Media Guide - Latest Comments in 5 Ways Social Media Will Change Recorded History</title><link>http://mashable.disqus.com/</link><description>Internet and Technology News - Mashable is the world’s largest blog focused exclusively on Web 2.0 and Social Networking news. With more than 5 million monthly pageviews, Mashable is the most prolific blog reviewing new Web sites and services, publishing breaking news on what’s new on the web.</description><atom:link href="https://mashable.disqus.com/thread_7917/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2009 02:22:38 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: 5 Ways Social Media Will Change Recorded History</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/11/18/consequences-of-social-media/#comment-8321875</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I am constantly amazed at the willingness of the current generation that has grown up with the Internet as mainstream to be completely open and "on display".  Even intelligent, well informed young adults are comfortable in a way that is suprising to me.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">FMJ</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2009 02:22:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 5 Ways Social Media Will Change Recorded History</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/11/18/consequences-of-social-media/#comment-6027695</link><description>&lt;p&gt;You're absolutely right.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Laura Stafford</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 13:09:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 5 Ways Social Media Will Change Recorded History</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/11/18/consequences-of-social-media/#comment-6027694</link><description>&lt;p&gt;That is kind of the point I was trying to make. &lt;br&gt;We are going to have to start being more tolerant of the past or we are in for a bit of trouble.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Brendan</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 14:15:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 5 Ways Social Media Will Change Recorded History</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/11/18/consequences-of-social-media/#comment-6027693</link><description>&lt;p&gt;This all is true only if we are able to permanently capture electronically recorded information.  Who knows if our posts will all be accessible in 500 years or even 100?  Paper is much more permanent.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Not that this invalidates the main points here, which are reasonable, but there are definitely diaries out there that do capture interactions with others.  I write in one, and for the past 14 years I've been writing about my interactions with those around me on a daily basis. And just look at what Laurel Thatcher Ulrich was able to do with Martha Ballard's diary, the midwife in Maine who wrote fragmentary comments between 1785 and 1812.  Ulrich made a fabulous study of the everyday and ordinary, so keep in mind there is history out there that does that.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I do hope a historian is able to do it with all of our electronic musings down the road.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Rami</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 13:20:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 5 Ways Social Media Will Change Recorded History</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/11/18/consequences-of-social-media/#comment-6027692</link><description>&lt;p&gt;All those aspiring to political offices, beware! Your history - terrorist friends, communist friends,homo friends, what you did innocently,what you did delibrately are being recorded. That is in case you want to run for any office.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Salihu</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2008 08:47:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 5 Ways Social Media Will Change Recorded History</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/11/18/consequences-of-social-media/#comment-6027691</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Great post and great discussion.  People really need to be aware that everything they post on facebook, myspace, and joe's blog will all be used against them one day.  Over the past few years, I've been in a position where I hire many people.  A new part of the employee screening process is to look them up on the internet.  If they have a distinct enough name, a simple google search usually gives me a good picture of who they are.  Now the challenge, for me, is ignoring information that shouldn't impact my hiring decision...  I doubt everyone will be able to do that.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Damian</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 19:32:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 5 Ways Social Media Will Change Recorded History</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/11/18/consequences-of-social-media/#comment-6027689</link><description>&lt;p&gt;This is an absolutely huge question.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I do not doubt that social media will change the recorded history. It would be a fallacy to do so.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;What I doubt is assumption by some that this is necessarily a good thing, or indeed that it will make some people more accountable. I disagree particularly with your fourth point Ben. Who cares if someone was angry as a child? And what definition do we give to angry? What was the context surrounding this alleged character trait?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Social media may give future access to some more of the daily minutiae of people's lives, but it will provide very little context to that information.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Marcus</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 19:23:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 5 Ways Social Media Will Change Recorded History</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/11/18/consequences-of-social-media/#comment-6027688</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I don't for one minute think that most people tarnish their online reputation because they are stupid. If it were truly a matter of stupidity, then these same people would have reputation problems offline as well. In my opinion, people just don't understand the technology and definitely don't understand the power/pitfalls of syndication. I chalk alot of social media scandals up to naivete.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;For example read about Bono's Facebook dilemma.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.briansolis.com/2008/10/where-streets-have-names-learning-from.html" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.briansolis.com/2008/10/where-streets-have-names-learning-from.html"&gt;http://www.briansolis.com/2...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I wouldn't begin to call Bono stupid. In fact, he is extremely intelligent and very savvy. What he didn't understand is that no matter how tightly he attempts to control his own PR, there is a new mechanism that he can't control. It's called the Groundswell.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;For Bono (and all of us) the game has changed. It's our job to learn how to operate in it.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jeremy Hilton</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 13:37:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 5 Ways Social Media Will Change Recorded History</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/11/18/consequences-of-social-media/#comment-6027686</link><description>&lt;p&gt;People who give away their privacy from these social networks are stupid.  Also, these stupid parents should monitor their kids, if they are not old enough to drink and gamble then they are not old enough to use MySpace, Twitter, etc...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Diamonds</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 13:11:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 5 Ways Social Media Will Change Recorded History</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/11/18/consequences-of-social-media/#comment-6027684</link><description>&lt;p&gt;great post! at least one downside thought.  as the husband of a lawyer all this documentation of our moves and opinions makes discovery MUCH easier so be careful.  whoa.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jim</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 09:44:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 5 Ways Social Media Will Change Recorded History</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/11/18/consequences-of-social-media/#comment-6027683</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Like everything else on the Internet that has come and gone:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;1&amp;gt; When it's free, it will save the human race as we know it&lt;br&gt;2&amp;gt; Eventually somedoby figures out how to monetize it&lt;br&gt;3&amp;gt; Our appetite for paying for it is tested, and retested&lt;br&gt;4&amp;gt; A few people become fabulously wealthy, everyone else makes very little&lt;br&gt;5&amp;gt; Much wailing and complaining ensue.&lt;br&gt;6&amp;gt; {Loop} #1&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Microblogging, location aware messaging, tagging, etc. will all follow the same path.  The real question is will you be one of the lucky ones, or will you be left bitter and demaning?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">MooseMasher</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 08:06:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 5 Ways Social Media Will Change Recorded History</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/11/18/consequences-of-social-media/#comment-6027682</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I love social media, its one of the best systems !&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Clubit.tv</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 05:34:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 5 Ways Social Media Will Change Recorded History</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/11/18/consequences-of-social-media/#comment-6027681</link><description>&lt;p&gt;But Note: &lt;br&gt;========&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;1. Info and Precison are only available IF NOT DELETED. Take the example of what the Republican RNC did to E-mail.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;2. Just like Conspiracy Theories, after a 100 years, you may have Conflicting Data. The PROVENANCE of Data may be weak as the years pass by, and this can lead to Ambiguity and Confusion, and not Precsion.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;---  imodotcom&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">imodotcom</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 00:44:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 5 Ways Social Media Will Change Recorded History</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/11/18/consequences-of-social-media/#comment-6027679</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I just wrote about an aspect of this a few days ago at &lt;a href="http://blog.zooloo.com/2008/11/care-before-you-share-pick-before-you-click/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://blog.zooloo.com/2008/11/care-before-you-share-pick-before-you-click/"&gt;http://blog.zooloo.com/2008...&lt;/a&gt;. The photo issue is so right on - people are screwing up their careers everyday by posting party pics and not limiting who can see the pictures. I've had friends who wonder why they can't get a job, when a quick Google search will show you WHY no one (in their right mind) would hire them.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The history aspect is also very interesting to me. The other day I was thinking about how in the next few years (not to mention the next 100 years), kids will no longer carry around big heavy books to school, to learn about history...it's all on the Internet.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Melissa</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 19:06:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 5 Ways Social Media Will Change Recorded History</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/11/18/consequences-of-social-media/#comment-6027678</link><description>&lt;p&gt;There's always going to be the bit of the story that didn't go on to the internet.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I was also going to say what JP said. In electronic media, everything is changeable. Thus the biggest change to history might be that future archeologists have to do more digging. Information is far more difficult to sift through than soil.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Sherwin</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 18:41:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 5 Ways Social Media Will Change Recorded History</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/11/18/consequences-of-social-media/#comment-6027677</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Oops, that was meant to be a reply to Barb's comment.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">JP</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 18:20:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 5 Ways Social Media Will Change Recorded History</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/11/18/consequences-of-social-media/#comment-6027676</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Further more, who will ensure that the data isn't tampered with before it's archived?  It is infinitely easier to alter electronic data (see Electronic Voting Machines affect on the 2004 election) and never get caught then it is to alter print media.  Take myspace as example: Rupert Murdoch, owner of the most unapologeticaly biased news source in the US, owns the site and all data listed on it.  Do you trust him as a Librarian of History?  Truth is not his industry.&lt;br&gt;Great post, but I do disagree with your trust in the incorruptibility of information.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">JP</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 18:19:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 5 Ways Social Media Will Change Recorded History</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/11/18/consequences-of-social-media/#comment-6027675</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Great thoughts on the subject.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;In particular, I am really curious as to how archived social media data will play a part in the lives of other future famous figures. Part of being human is making mistakes, learning, and then changing. What 60+ year old can honestly say that they haven't somehow deviated from the ideas they expressed when they we 20? My fear is that we will fall into over analyzing archived data and unfairly drawing conclusions about a persons current beliefs/values.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jeremy Hilton</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 18:04:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 5 Ways Social Media Will Change Recorded History</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/11/18/consequences-of-social-media/#comment-6027674</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Valid points, but who's going to archive all the social media (and in a format that's accessible by future technology)?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Barb</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 17:13:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 5 Ways Social Media Will Change Recorded History</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/11/18/consequences-of-social-media/#comment-6027673</link><description>&lt;p&gt;"this has a plethora of consequences on how we record history"&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;How is a more accurate account of history a consequence?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I think what you mean is that our lives are transparent and our daily lives are now accessible by everyone, including the government.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;But as far as Historical record keeping, this is one of the best things that has ever happened to us.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Ruben&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://twitter.com/redstarvip" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="twitter.com/redstarvip"&gt;twitter.com/redstarvip&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">The Social Reformer</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 16:51:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 5 Ways Social Media Will Change Recorded History</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/11/18/consequences-of-social-media/#comment-6027672</link><description>&lt;p&gt;It used to be "On the internet no one knows your a dog."&lt;br&gt; Now it is everyone knows you are a dog."&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;In the future we are going to have to stop putting politicians on pedestals. We are going to have to stop expecting that they are more pure than the average Joe, we are going to have to stop expecting that they don't sometimes cheat on their wives, or get drunk and stupid, or even god forbid watch porn on the computer. If we don't we won't have any politicians anymore. (Hey that might not be such a bad thing.)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Brendan</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 16:51:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 5 Ways Social Media Will Change Recorded History</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/11/18/consequences-of-social-media/#comment-6027668</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Talk about social media as a history tool, social media is helping me correct the historic record on behalf of my distant relative Sir Thomas Grantham. History records that the leader of America's first rebellion, Nathaniel Bacon, died of fever.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Sir Thomas Grantham wrote in his notes on Bacon's Rebellion that Bacon actually died of the Lousy Evil - a pubic lice infestation - in 1676. Social Media helped me make sure his version of the facts is known and shared. I linked the story to my name here.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Christian Grantham</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 14:20:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 5 Ways Social Media Will Change Recorded History</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/11/18/consequences-of-social-media/#comment-6027666</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The beginning of the new world order perhaps? &lt;br&gt;I will stick to blog commenting at the most.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">R</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 14:15:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 5 Ways Social Media Will Change Recorded History</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/11/18/consequences-of-social-media/#comment-6027665</link><description>&lt;p&gt;You have control still.  I choose to make my life an open book on the net.  Anything I don't want out, I keep in my head.  You just have to find the balance you're comfortable with, or use the tools that protect your privacy enough.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;But like I said in #5, it'll start another ethics war.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ben Parr</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 13:51:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 5 Ways Social Media Will Change Recorded History</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/11/18/consequences-of-social-media/#comment-6027664</link><description>&lt;p&gt;What was I doing on July 14th? Banging your mom.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ron Jeremy</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 13:49:43 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>