<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Mashable - The Social Media Guide - Latest Comments in YouTube, Viacom Both Want To Uphold User Privacy. As For IPs&amp;#8230;</title><link>http://mashable.disqus.com/</link><description>Internet and Technology News - Mashable is the world’s largest blog focused exclusively on Web 2.0 and Social Networking news. With more than 5 million monthly pageviews, Mashable is the most prolific blog reviewing new Web sites and services, publishing breaking news on what’s new on the web.</description><atom:link href="https://mashable.disqus.com/thread_7909/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2008 09:52:16 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: YouTube, Viacom Both Want To Uphold User Privacy. As For IPs&amp;#8230;</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/07/05/youtube-viacom/#comment-6009746</link><description>&lt;p&gt;hello Ä±m  selin&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">selin</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2008 09:52:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: YouTube, Viacom Both Want To Uphold User Privacy. As For IPs&amp;#8230;</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/07/05/youtube-viacom/#comment-6009745</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Is it wrong that I'd like to see the EU tear up Viacom for it's lawyers ignoring privacy concerns?  The "agreement" that IP addresses are not identifiable makes Viacom's case sound like it starts with deception, so the normal paranoia has been handed a seed.  Everybody's heard of the RIAA's approach to legal culpability.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Information with identifiers in place of IP addresses has been done before, by Google, no less when it was marketing search history.  For statistical analysis, it makes no difference if it's 24.12.24.12 or user32123 unless you want the IP address for some reason, in which case you'd ask the judge for it, and they did.  These "agreements between lawyers" don't mean a thing without the judge, though I could see wanting to set a precedent for providing such information for future legal actions.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Hopefully YouTube/Google will learn the lesson Microsoft and various other have about keeping uselessly dated information too long.  Do logs from 2000 have any value to anyone other than a plaintiff suing them for something or other?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I use YouTube daily for non-commercial stuff, I don't watch television over the net, I have a DVR tuner card, why would I bother?  Come check me out.  Spend lots of money doing it please.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jalek</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2008 22:57:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: YouTube, Viacom Both Want To Uphold User Privacy. As For IPs&amp;#8230;</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/07/05/youtube-viacom/#comment-6009744</link><description>&lt;p&gt;have you ever considered that this article is the exact public outcry the courts may have intended to spawn? let's think about the direct consequences to me, goog/youtube, and viacomm:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;1) i won't view copyrighted materials on youtube anymore for fear of being sued.&lt;br&gt;2) for google, the above statement has the result that they have less liability to viacomm in the future. people will self-censor their viewing habits and be more hesitant to view protected materials. youtube has largely failed in taking down protected material and until there's an algorithm to detect copyrighted material, the way to censor cheaply is to instill fear in the viewers.&lt;br&gt;3) viacomm's copyrighted materials are not posted on youtube as much and they can profit more.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mark Z</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 12 Jul 2008 03:58:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: YouTube, Viacom Both Want To Uphold User Privacy. As For IPs&amp;#8230;</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/07/05/youtube-viacom/#comment-6009743</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Paul - your first point there is exactly right.  Any data about users that Viacom receives would only be able to be used in the current case.  We'd never be able to use it to pursue individual users, nor would we want to.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Fortunately, discussions between the parties are ongoing, and it appears that Viacom, Google and the class action group will be able to figure out a way to transmit this data without user names or IP addresses.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;-Jeremy Zweig&lt;br&gt;Vice President, Viacom Media and Editorial&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jeremy Zweig</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 20:38:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: YouTube, Viacom Both Want To Uphold User Privacy. As For IPs&amp;#8230;</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/07/05/youtube-viacom/#comment-6009741</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Well, Viacom would presumably want as much data as it can get. The more the better, from Viacom's perspective.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">PaulGlazowski</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 06 Jul 2008 09:26:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: YouTube, Viacom Both Want To Uphold User Privacy. As For IPs&amp;#8230;</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/07/05/youtube-viacom/#comment-6009740</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Why can't Viacom explain to Google exactly what kind of information or results it hopes to get out of the data, and then ask Google to supply it with the results, rather than asking for the raw data? End of the day, if they think Google is lying or trying to cover up, they can still go after the raw data again.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ling</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2008 23:55:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: YouTube, Viacom Both Want To Uphold User Privacy. As For IPs&amp;#8230;</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/07/05/youtube-viacom/#comment-6009739</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks for the catch! Edited accordingly.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">PaulGlazowski</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2008 19:15:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: YouTube, Viacom Both Want To Uphold User Privacy. As For IPs&amp;#8230;</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/07/05/youtube-viacom/#comment-6009738</link><description>&lt;p&gt;"Is this a bad omen for the video site, itâ€™s parent company, or the users?"&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The word is "its", not "it's".&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">David</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2008 19:08:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: YouTube, Viacom Both Want To Uphold User Privacy. As For IPs&amp;#8230;</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/07/05/youtube-viacom/#comment-6009737</link><description>&lt;p&gt;True, it does seem more effort than its worth. I am of the mind that videos posted to YouTube help Viacom's business rather than hurt it. As I've said in numerous past posts (say that five times fast), copyright law needs to be edited to make for a more consumer-friendly environment.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;It's really the whole idea of a convoluted civil law system where the average person breaks the law numerous times without even realizing it.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The problem here is that Viacom's efforts may hinder YouTube's business somewhat, at least in the short term. (If Viacom gets what it wants, I should add.) YouTube still isn't a hugely profitable business. Google needs to have as few barriers as possible to grow with this particular property. Otherwise, if Viacom gets a solid edge on this matter, things won't look so rosy for the average Web user, who, let's face it, has consumed quite a bit of material that technically infringes on copyright law as it stands today.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">PaulGlazowski</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2008 16:06:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: YouTube, Viacom Both Want To Uphold User Privacy. As For IPs&amp;#8230;</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/07/05/youtube-viacom/#comment-6009736</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I don't know how that works, exactly. My guess would be that anything spoken about in court, particularly to do with indirectly-affected users, must be kept only as it pertains to that case. I don't think Viacom could take the IPs recorded by YouTube and then subpoena Internet Service Providers to hand over IDs.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Furthermore, ISP subscribers only give you the people who pay for the Internet service. If you pay for monthly access, and a family member or roommate or whoever is the culprit, you're liable. Unless you can prove it was the other person, and not you.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;This brings me back to that "hugely messy for all" phrase I used in my original post.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">PaulGlazowski</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2008 15:59:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: YouTube, Viacom Both Want To Uphold User Privacy. As For IPs&amp;#8230;</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/07/05/youtube-viacom/#comment-6009735</link><description>&lt;p&gt;There is still no word over what happens with regards IP addresses - if it even gets that far - from other nations, in particular places like the EU where privacy laws would be breached left, right and centre. One wrong move from either of these companies is going to end in a deluge of legal threats. The situation both companies are now in is not good for either of them, and in some ways makes their spat over copyright seem trivial.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Denz</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2008 15:45:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: YouTube, Viacom Both Want To Uphold User Privacy. As For IPs&amp;#8230;</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/07/05/youtube-viacom/#comment-6009734</link><description>&lt;p&gt;If "IP addresses identify a computer, not the person using it. Itâ€™s not possible to determine your identity solely based on your IP address."  All they have to do then is subpena the ISP to find out who you are and then say, "while we can't say that you were the one who did it, it was your computer which was your property and in your possession and since possession is 9/10 of the law, we can safely say that it was you who did it.  So give us half of everythign you own or we'll sue and take all of it."&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;This is the same myopic thug tactics that the RIAA takes.  They don't have to prove that anyone accessessed the files, but because you left file sharing enabled on your Win XP computer, you are automatically guilty.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mickey Blue Eyes</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2008 14:56:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: YouTube, Viacom Both Want To Uphold User Privacy. As For IPs&amp;#8230;</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/07/05/youtube-viacom/#comment-6009733</link><description>&lt;p&gt;User privacy until the data "accidentally" gets let out on the web somehow but hackers or a rogue employee.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Thanks...Rob&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Rob Walters</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2008 13:22:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: YouTube, Viacom Both Want To Uphold User Privacy. As For IPs&amp;#8230;</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/07/05/youtube-viacom/#comment-6009732</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Interesting! "User Privacy"&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Daniel ZÃ¡rate</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2008 12:09:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: YouTube, Viacom Both Want To Uphold User Privacy. As For IPs&amp;#8230;</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/07/05/youtube-viacom/#comment-6009731</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Join the Stand against Viacom&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.VideoFetcher.com/viacom.cfm" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.VideoFetcher.com/viacom.cfm"&gt;http://www.VideoFetcher.com...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Rob Walters</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2008 11:43:23 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>