<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Mashable - The Social Media Guide - Latest Comments in Gene Simmons Blames Radiohead For The Demise Of Civilization</title><link>http://mashable.disqus.com/</link><description>Internet and Technology News - Mashable is the world’s largest blog focused exclusively on Web 2.0 and Social Networking news. With more than 5 million monthly pageviews, Mashable is the most prolific blog reviewing new Web sites and services, publishing breaking news on what’s new on the web.</description><atom:link href="https://mashable.disqus.com/thread_7675/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Jun 2008 14:01:41 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Gene Simmons Blames Radiohead For The Demise Of Civilization</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/06/19/gene-simmons-radiohead/#comment-6007676</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Can anyone tell me ONE new artist who's "broken" (500k units + or financial equivalent) only because of the web???&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Most average americans are still exposed to new music through repetitive play  on terrestrial radio and television. The web is a SECONDARY source for most- where they go after the Tonight Show appearance to find out more about that band they just saw. Sure. you have niche sites like Pitchfork or other music blogs that cater to a small sliver of indie-rock types- but on a mass scale- I'm still waiting for that watershed moment.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Artists will always need a source of funding and human resouces to help them promote their content. That is the core competency of the music business. It's really not going anywhere as a whole, although the players may change.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;What the Demon doesn't seem to get is that he's all about moving "units" of tangible product. It's now about monetizing consumption without purchase.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bill</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 21 Jun 2008 14:01:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Gene Simmons Blames Radiohead For The Demise Of Civilization</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/06/19/gene-simmons-radiohead/#comment-6007675</link><description>&lt;p&gt;he probably doesn't know how to use a computer.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">fakedjs</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2008 07:28:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Gene Simmons Blames Radiohead For The Demise Of Civilization</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/06/19/gene-simmons-radiohead/#comment-6007674</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Of course he has it completely backwards, he's part of the status quo. Who would actually pay for his music these days? And for that matter, who says musicians deserve the kind of money he has? Music is a want not a need. In an age of $5+ for a gallon of gas I'll tell you where he can stick his tongue and spoiled kids. Right up his decadent *** and the decadent ***es of the music industry executives who sit around all day doing nothing and calling it work while we market and promote their bands more and better than they ever could. When they give half of their paycheck to teachers and the struggling people who they want to force to pay for entertainment is the day I'll start give them a little respect.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jake Lockley</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 20:35:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Gene Simmons Blames Radiohead For The Demise Of Civilization</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/06/19/gene-simmons-radiohead/#comment-6007673</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I watched the beginning of his reality show and he talked the entire time about how important money was for life.  Basically, its impossible to be happy without money.  It really made me sick and I don't have any respect for him.  He can go back to face painting gags and disco experimentation.  Leave real music for Radiohead.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Not This God</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 18:25:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Gene Simmons Blames Radiohead For The Demise Of Civilization</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/06/19/gene-simmons-radiohead/#comment-6007672</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Radiohead was once a bunch of poor musicians, so the argument is not really fair. Their label helped make them enormously popular which allowed them to do their little "pay what you want experiment". So pinning the demise of the industry on them is a silly claim.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The music industry's gravy (greed) days are over, and the sooner they go bankrupt and re-emerge from the ashes as a promotion machine - nothing more - the better. This inherently means there will be fewer mega-popular bands out there like Radiohead, but removing the middleman arguably lowers the bar for everyone else to make and consume music.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Labels need to reinvent themselves as promoters who do not get the copyrights, but are paid for their distribution/airplay expertise.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">DotPoet</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 16:55:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Gene Simmons Blames Radiohead For The Demise Of Civilization</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/06/19/gene-simmons-radiohead/#comment-6007671</link><description>&lt;p&gt;In what parallel universe is Gene Simmons considered the "ultimate rock rebel"?  Talk about buying into the marketing hype the major studios pump out.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mojo Yugen</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 15:57:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Gene Simmons Blames Radiohead For The Demise Of Civilization</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/06/19/gene-simmons-radiohead/#comment-6007670</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I may be wrong about this but it seems to me that, despite appearances, Simmons has been a right wing conservative all along. Complaining about a situation that has already irretrievably changed is a waste of energy. Like it or not we're not going back to the old model.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Martin Edic</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 14:42:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Gene Simmons Blames Radiohead For The Demise Of Civilization</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/06/19/gene-simmons-radiohead/#comment-6007669</link><description>&lt;p&gt;pretty disgraceful - the music industry wasn't smart enough to modernise before the fans. sounds harsh to say, but those who take this stance brought this on themselves with greed - great article.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">willfoxy</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 13:13:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Gene Simmons Blames Radiohead For The Demise Of Civilization</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/06/19/gene-simmons-radiohead/#comment-6007668</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Unfortuantely,&lt;br&gt;I'd have to agree with Gene on this...the digital age has destroyed music.  From the quality of the music in mp3 format to the file sharing.  Sure, I download for free to get a taste of what's to come BUT, if its quality product...I go and purchase the cd.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;1, to support the artist BECAUSE I'm an artist myself&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;and&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;2, because I want the quality sound of a .wav format. (If I can find it in vinyl...EVEN Better!)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I believe if you're a true fan...you'll rather see the artist performing their tunes over mp3 or .wav any day.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Thats just my take on it.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">COMA</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 12:10:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Gene Simmons Blames Radiohead For The Demise Of Civilization</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/06/19/gene-simmons-radiohead/#comment-6007667</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://Fu.ck" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="Fu.ck"&gt;Fu.ck&lt;/a&gt; he has a LOT of money.... and he wants LOT more... &lt;a href="http://fu.ck" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="fu.ck"&gt;fu.ck&lt;/a&gt; (metal?)lica, Simons and their friends -.-&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">maze</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 11:07:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Gene Simmons Blames Radiohead For The Demise Of Civilization</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/06/19/gene-simmons-radiohead/#comment-6007666</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Riddle me this; why are some of today's "fans" unwilling to pay musicians for their IP?  Does anyone really believe musicians will be able to prosper by selling t-shirts and giving concerts promoted through their own efforts on the web?  Does anyone really believe that every business can become a media model by taking a slice of the pie offered by advertisers?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I don't object to any effort that pries away the grip that creepy record companies have on musicians and fans and a new model is necessary.  However, would NIN and similar brands be able to replicate their financial success using the model promoted by the "fan" behavior emerging recently?  I say; unlikely.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Never cared for Gene Simmons, but setting aside his easily criticized antics; the underlying argument around the economic model rings true.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">JB</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 10:41:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Gene Simmons Blames Radiohead For The Demise Of Civilization</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/06/19/gene-simmons-radiohead/#comment-6007665</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I think the difference is that Radiohead, and Nine Inch Nails are musicians who aren't signed anymore to a record label.  Where as KISS and Metallica are still puppets on strings who signed crappy record deals.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">the difference</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 10:25:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Gene Simmons Blames Radiohead For The Demise Of Civilization</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/06/19/gene-simmons-radiohead/#comment-6007664</link><description>&lt;p&gt;This just shows how big the disconnect is between guys like Gene Simmons and his real fans. Blaming his fans because he isn't willing to adapt to new business models is not the way to go.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jason Peck</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 10:23:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Gene Simmons Blames Radiohead For The Demise Of Civilization</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/06/19/gene-simmons-radiohead/#comment-6007663</link><description>&lt;p&gt;yet he goes on tv with that aweful reality show.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">nicole</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 10:13:44 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>