http://mashable.disqus.com/Internet and Technology News - Mashable is the world’s largest blog focused exclusively on Web 2.0 and Social Networking news. With more than 5 million monthly pageviews, Mashable is the most prolific blog reviewing new Web sites and services, publishing breaking news on what’s new on the web.enThu, 07 Jun 2007 01:45:01 -0000http://mashable.com/2007/06/04/rocketboom-sponsors/#comment-5949473<p>Well he was previously claiming $85,000 a week, so at least he's down to $15k now.</p><p>Rocketboom view counts on YouTube are rather eye opening. 65 subscribers and fewer than 200 views per show? Wow.</p><p>I'd describe it as a train wreck -- but videos of a train wreck would actually get watched on YouTube.</p><p>Also: the current wave "sponsorships" aren't paid. These are freebies in the time-honored tradition of street musicians putting a few of their own bills in the tip jar.</p><p>As if YouTube really needs to advertise on Rocketboom...</p>meanguyThu, 07 Jun 2007 01:45:01 -0000http://mashable.com/2007/06/04/rocketboom-sponsors/#comment-5949472<p>Is it really worth it? Does anyone really care about Rocketboom?</p>DiggbeeMon, 04 Jun 2007 14:36:12 -0000http://mashable.com/2007/06/04/rocketboom-sponsors/#comment-5949471<p>Very cool. I wonder how long before we see network level television offered on on the web first. Just think, we could poor our resources and pay for a whole new season of FireFly! :)</p><p>Gal</p>60 in 3Mon, 04 Jun 2007 12:27:17 -0000http://mashable.com/2007/06/04/rocketboom-sponsors/#comment-5949470<p>$5K per episode - that's a lot of moolah!</p>AliMon, 04 Jun 2007 07:24:31 -0000http://mashable.com/2007/06/04/rocketboom-sponsors/#comment-5949469<p>Huge move in my opinion. It's about time.</p>David KrugMon, 04 Jun 2007 06:13:33 -0000