<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Mashable - The Social Media Guide - Latest Comments in Congoo &amp;#8211; Premium Content Search Engine</title><link>http://mashable.disqus.com/</link><description>Internet and Technology News - Mashable is the world’s largest blog focused exclusively on Web 2.0 and Social Networking news. With more than 5 million monthly pageviews, Mashable is the most prolific blog reviewing new Web sites and services, publishing breaking news on what’s new on the web.</description><atom:link href="https://mashable.disqus.com/thread_73/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2008 09:20:55 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Congoo &amp;#8211; Premium Content Search Engine</title><link>http://mashable.com/2005/12/02/congoo-premium-content-search-engine/#comment-5889202</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Very interesting thanks for the info&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jaho</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2008 09:20:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Congoo &amp;#8211; Premium Content Search Engine</title><link>http://mashable.com/2005/12/02/congoo-premium-content-search-engine/#comment-5889201</link><description>&lt;p&gt;PC World Just featured Congoo on their June cover as one of the 14 smartest search engines....&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Susan Deluca</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2007 14:18:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Congoo &amp;#8211; Premium Content Search Engine</title><link>http://mashable.com/2005/12/02/congoo-premium-content-search-engine/#comment-5889200</link><description>&lt;p&gt;In the long run know one knows if Congoo or other search related projects will succeed or fail. But Charlene Li's argument that it is going to be real hard to change people's search behavior has little relevance, in my opinion. That could be said about any new idea or technology. Accepting the status quo simply means the death of progress. Congoo may take some time to catch on, and it may never catch on. But it could also lead to the next big business model for search engines- negotiating with content providers to generate traffic and revenue to both the search engine as well as the providers.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jason</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2007 10:50:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Congoo &amp;#8211; Premium Content Search Engine</title><link>http://mashable.com/2005/12/02/congoo-premium-content-search-engine/#comment-5889199</link><description>&lt;p&gt;A good Congoo review here:&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.couriermail.news.com.au/story/0,20797,18884502-5003418,00.html" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.couriermail.news.com.au/story/0,20797,18884502-5003418,00.html"&gt;http://www.couriermail.news...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Belinda Weaver</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 21 Apr 2006 14:07:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Congoo &amp;#8211; Premium Content Search Engine</title><link>http://mashable.com/2005/12/02/congoo-premium-content-search-engine/#comment-5889198</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Oscar,&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Maybe instead of pursuing the suicidal strategy of locking their content away, publishers should open it up to anyone who wants to consume it.  Monetization is through advertising and services.  It's not that publishers are being systematically destroyed - it's that they're refusing to adapt to the new economic environment.  More here:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://mashable.com/2005/12/31/why-online-media-should-be-free-and-why-we-should-embrace-the-splogophere/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://mashable.com/2005/12/31/why-online-media-should-be-free-and-why-we-should-embrace-the-splogophere/"&gt;Mashable&amp;gt;Why Online Media Should be Free...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Pete Cashmore</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Jan 2006 08:10:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Congoo &amp;#8211; Premium Content Search Engine</title><link>http://mashable.com/2005/12/02/congoo-premium-content-search-engine/#comment-5889197</link><description>&lt;p&gt;All research shows very clearly that no one has an allegiance to any search engines, as a matter of fact Ms. Lee has been quoted several times saying that so which is it?  Why wouldnt a publisher do this, they are systematically being destroyed by search engines that DONT features their content, making them less and less relevant to bloggers and SEO optimized pages.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Oscar Flores</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 07 Dec 2005 21:07:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Congoo &amp;#8211; Premium Content Search Engine</title><link>http://mashable.com/2005/12/02/congoo-premium-content-search-engine/#comment-5889196</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Brian - that's ok, we're sticking with generic names since I think it's better than narrowing your scope from the outset.  I'll let you know when the beta starts (should be early 2006, perhaps earlier).&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Pete Cashmore</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2005 11:07:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Congoo &amp;#8211; Premium Content Search Engine</title><link>http://mashable.com/2005/12/02/congoo-premium-content-search-engine/#comment-5889195</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Pete,&lt;br&gt;If I had ANY idea wtf your software did, I could come up with a few names. However I still don't "get it" send me a beta invite or something breslin[at]&lt;a href="http://infinimedia.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="infinimedia.com"&gt;infinimedia.com&lt;/a&gt; and i will send you suggestions.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Brian Breslin</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2005 10:51:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Congoo &amp;#8211; Premium Content Search Engine</title><link>http://mashable.com/2005/12/02/congoo-premium-content-search-engine/#comment-5889194</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Brian,&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I'm working on a project called Noodly - I'm in no position to say another company has a stupid name.  :)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;BTW: If anyone comes up with a better name than Noodly, I'd be happy to change it.  "Vorro" was another possibility for us.  The oo's do get annoying, but they're certainly easier to spell than &lt;a href="http://del.icio.us" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="del.icio.us"&gt;del.icio.us&lt;/a&gt; (although &lt;a href="http://delicious.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="delicious.com"&gt;delicious.com&lt;/a&gt; now redirects to &lt;a href="http://del.icio.us" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="del.icio.us"&gt;del.icio.us&lt;/a&gt;).&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Pete Cashmore</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2005 15:12:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Congoo &amp;#8211; Premium Content Search Engine</title><link>http://mashable.com/2005/12/02/congoo-premium-content-search-engine/#comment-5889193</link><description>&lt;p&gt;alright not to sound like a pessimist, but what the heck is going on w/the naming of these companies recently?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">brian breslin</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2005 15:05:10 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>