<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Mashable - The Social Media Guide - Latest Comments in On Business Models for Web 2.0</title><link>http://mashable.disqus.com/</link><description>Internet and Technology News - Mashable is the world’s largest blog focused exclusively on Web 2.0 and Social Networking news. With more than 5 million monthly pageviews, Mashable is the most prolific blog reviewing new Web sites and services, publishing breaking news on what’s new on the web.</description><atom:link href="https://mashable.disqus.com/thread_726/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2008 09:03:04 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: On Business Models for Web 2.0</title><link>http://mashable.com/2005/12/08/on-business-models-for-web-20/#comment-5889441</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Very interesting thanks for the info&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jaho</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2008 09:03:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: On Business Models for Web 2.0</title><link>http://mashable.com/2005/12/08/on-business-models-for-web-20/#comment-5889439</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Well, I decided to podcast about it instead.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Paul Montgomery</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 09 Dec 2005 10:50:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: On Business Models for Web 2.0</title><link>http://mashable.com/2005/12/08/on-business-models-for-web-20/#comment-5889438</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Yes, that's it. I'll expand further in my next blog post.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Paul Montgomery</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 09 Dec 2005 08:03:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: On Business Models for Web 2.0</title><link>http://mashable.com/2005/12/08/on-business-models-for-web-20/#comment-5889437</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Paul,&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Thanks for that. I think I understand what you're saying; the content is inspired by the content of other sites, but still unique.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Pete Cashmore</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 09 Dec 2005 06:06:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: On Business Models for Web 2.0</title><link>http://mashable.com/2005/12/08/on-business-models-for-web-20/#comment-5889436</link><description>&lt;p&gt;More on productisation here:&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://tinfinger.blogspot.com/2005/12/its-all-about-mawsons.html" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://tinfinger.blogspot.com/2005/12/its-all-about-mawsons.html"&gt;http://tinfinger.blogspot.c...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The sort of thing I was thinking about is in the second last paragraph of that piece: [A company attempts] "to devise its own products that do not use the IP of other sites, but relate to the same things that the other sites are covering, with the assumption that your users are familiar with that content because they have visited those other sites (probably through your links or mashup code)."&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Maybe productisation is the wrong word. What I am talking about is creating new, independently legally defensible IP which is nonetheless dependent on consumers' broad knowledge of IP belonging to some other entity. I guess it's one of those concepts that is best explained by example, but I don't want to give away Tinfinger's game just yet.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Paul Montgomery</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2005 22:18:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: On Business Models for Web 2.0</title><link>http://mashable.com/2005/12/08/on-business-models-for-web-20/#comment-5889435</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I think one of the issues with this is not the need for NEW business models, but for companies to look for monetizing extensions to their existing stuff. Subscriptions combined with transactions look to be the most realistic concept for me. Thats the easiest for people to translate to financial success in my opinion (at least for companies like 37S and others building business apps).  For consumer pure-plays I would think the best way to go about this would be a combination of subscription and microcommerce/brokering (the idea would be you can license your content through an aggregating company and they give you a cut, and take a cut for the leads).&lt;br&gt;Why not get your flickr account or techblog syndicated into a magazine? Assuming you pre-approve your content for republication, then why not?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Brian Breslin</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2005 15:44:22 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>