<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Mashable - The Social Media Guide - Latest Comments in Google&amp;#8217;s Sneaky Ads for Chrome in Gmail</title><link>http://mashable.disqus.com/</link><description>Internet and Technology News - Mashable is the world’s largest blog focused exclusively on Web 2.0 and Social Networking news. With more than 5 million monthly pageviews, Mashable is the most prolific blog reviewing new Web sites and services, publishing breaking news on what’s new on the web.</description><atom:link href="https://mashable.disqus.com/thread_71906/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 19:10:10 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Google&amp;#8217;s Sneaky Ads for Chrome in Gmail</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/12/30/google-chrome-ads-in-gmail/#comment-7543789</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I have tried Chrome. They are going to have to try harder than this to get more users...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Paul</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 19:10:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google&amp;#8217;s Sneaky Ads for Chrome in Gmail</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/12/30/google-chrome-ads-in-gmail/#comment-6034486</link><description>&lt;p&gt;am I the only one here who has seen Chrome ads in Chrome gmail itself.&lt;br&gt;I thought it would be news that Google can not detect its own browser and still&lt;br&gt;keeps pushing the ad (wasting their inventory and dollars if i click the ad)&lt;br&gt;That's a great example that google also wastes money.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ajay</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 02 Jan 2009 15:03:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google&amp;#8217;s Sneaky Ads for Chrome in Gmail</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/12/30/google-chrome-ads-in-gmail/#comment-6034485</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I think it's all the same, its not like we notice a microsecond of difference in speed.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">M2Mz</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 02 Jan 2009 01:47:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google&amp;#8217;s Sneaky Ads for Chrome in Gmail</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/12/30/google-chrome-ads-in-gmail/#comment-6034484</link><description>&lt;p&gt;They also push it on youtube.  All good though..&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Angel Rodriguez</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2008 23:40:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google&amp;#8217;s Sneaky Ads for Chrome in Gmail</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/12/30/google-chrome-ads-in-gmail/#comment-6034481</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Google Gears is bundled in the Chrome install, which will make GMail faster and more responsive.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;So its pretty justified really.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Christopher Osborne</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2008 10:31:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google&amp;#8217;s Sneaky Ads for Chrome in Gmail</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/12/30/google-chrome-ads-in-gmail/#comment-6034480</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Why shouldn't a business leverage on its existing web property to promote new ones? So long as the ad is telling the truth ("faster"), it's good for the users as well.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Rocky Fu</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2008 05:09:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google&amp;#8217;s Sneaky Ads for Chrome in Gmail</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/12/30/google-chrome-ads-in-gmail/#comment-6034478</link><description>&lt;p&gt;While on GF's father's machine I saw the "make gmail faster" notice.  I was using FF 2 though, not IE.  Additionally, larger graphical push was made for Firefox 3 and Chrome, but in small text below the two was a blurb and link to IE 8 beta 2.  Some comments from screenshot site linked to in post also seem to imply experience has varied.  I agree though that it seems a bit fishy the "make experience faster" is only being shown in gmail, rather than maps, or docs.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">APC</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2008 22:02:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google&amp;#8217;s Sneaky Ads for Chrome in Gmail</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/12/30/google-chrome-ads-in-gmail/#comment-6034476</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I don't quite consider that sneaky. Gmail (and most other JavaScript'ed sites/apps) IS faster in Chrome.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ash</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2008 21:48:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google&amp;#8217;s Sneaky Ads for Chrome in Gmail</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/12/30/google-chrome-ads-in-gmail/#comment-6034475</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Will it really make Gmail faster?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Greg</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2008 18:33:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google&amp;#8217;s Sneaky Ads for Chrome in Gmail</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/12/30/google-chrome-ads-in-gmail/#comment-6034473</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Yah, sneaky... but I love Chrome.  I wish they would hurry and release a Mac version so taht I can use it at home.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Funny how we are so forgiving when Google does things that, if it were Microsoft, would make us all scream.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Sean MacDhai</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2008 16:49:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google&amp;#8217;s Sneaky Ads for Chrome in Gmail</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/12/30/google-chrome-ads-in-gmail/#comment-6034472</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I'm most interested in how Google handles their relationship with Mozilla. &lt;br&gt;Without revenue from Google, Mozilla doesn't have a whole lot of money&lt;br&gt;coming in -- though it does have a lot of people still writing extensions, themes,&lt;br&gt;and so forth for it.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I personally would be careful how much time I spend developing for Firefox,&lt;br&gt;Flock, etc.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Brandon</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2008 15:43:19 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google&amp;#8217;s Sneaky Ads for Chrome in Gmail</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/12/30/google-chrome-ads-in-gmail/#comment-6034470</link><description>&lt;p&gt;They are so sly...&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;But this doesn't surprise me at all. I only wonder why they bother with Firefox (I guess brand recognition). Either way, it looks like they're simply out to get MSFT....&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">CT Moore</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2008 14:44:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google&amp;#8217;s Sneaky Ads for Chrome in Gmail</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/12/30/google-chrome-ads-in-gmail/#comment-6034469</link><description>&lt;p&gt;"I expect Google to do just about everything possible to convert users to Chrome"&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;They could start by releasing a version for Linux. Some of us actually want to give Chrome a try, but can't.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Frank</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2008 14:40:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google&amp;#8217;s Sneaky Ads for Chrome in Gmail</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/12/30/google-chrome-ads-in-gmail/#comment-6034468</link><description>&lt;p&gt;What's sneaky about it? They've long encouraged IE6 users to upgrade to IE7. Now that there's a demonstrable speed increase in moving from IE7 to Firefox or Chrome, they encourage users to switch. If Gmail is slow because of the browser, users blame Google, not Microsoft.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Fred</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2008 14:37:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google&amp;#8217;s Sneaky Ads for Chrome in Gmail</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/12/30/google-chrome-ads-in-gmail/#comment-6034467</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Anything to stop people from using IE is cool in my book. As Malcolm X once said: &lt;br&gt;"By Any Means Necessary".&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Bilbo</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2008 14:32:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google&amp;#8217;s Sneaky Ads for Chrome in Gmail</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/12/30/google-chrome-ads-in-gmail/#comment-6034466</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I'm not sure why you consider that "sneaky".  We get Gmail for free, so at the very least we should expect them to advertise other products.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">baldeagle</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2008 14:27:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google&amp;#8217;s Sneaky Ads for Chrome in Gmail</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/12/30/google-chrome-ads-in-gmail/#comment-6034465</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Google can be as sneaky as they want; I loves me some Chrome.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Now when I attempt to use the address bar as a google search box in other browsers and it doesn't work, I get all irritated.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">StephanieInCA</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2008 14:20:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google&amp;#8217;s Sneaky Ads for Chrome in Gmail</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/12/30/google-chrome-ads-in-gmail/#comment-6034464</link><description>&lt;p&gt;At least they bothered to mention Firefox. As soon as Chrome becomes a bit more stable and available for other platforms like Mac OS X and Firefox, I'm sure they'll drop mentioining Firefox.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ankur Banerjee</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2008 14:10:31 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>