<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Mashable - The Social Media Guide - Latest Comments in AlumWire &amp;#8211; Facebook Meets LinkedIn</title><link>http://mashable.disqus.com/</link><description>Internet and Technology News - Mashable is the world’s largest blog focused exclusively on Web 2.0 and Social Networking news. With more than 5 million monthly pageviews, Mashable is the most prolific blog reviewing new Web sites and services, publishing breaking news on what’s new on the web.</description><atom:link href="https://mashable.disqus.com/thread_7180/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Feb 2007 11:46:06 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: AlumWire &amp;#8211; Facebook Meets LinkedIn</title><link>http://mashable.com/2006/10/17/alumwire-facebook-meets-linkedin/#comment-5905907</link><description>&lt;p&gt;how much is this business worth&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">dedrick</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 06 Feb 2007 11:46:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: AlumWire &amp;#8211; Facebook Meets LinkedIn</title><link>http://mashable.com/2006/10/17/alumwire-facebook-meets-linkedin/#comment-5905906</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Well I still think the system makes no sense for an API and is just plain burdensome.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Since FB is open to the public anyway now, why not give each 3rd party website their own FB account so that they can they display publically available data without the need to get an individual user to login?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Adrian</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 18 Oct 2006 14:15:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: AlumWire &amp;#8211; Facebook Meets LinkedIn</title><link>http://mashable.com/2006/10/17/alumwire-facebook-meets-linkedin/#comment-5905905</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Facebook put intelligent safeguards around API use of its data.  The cost to login is a small price to know that your private data isn't open to just anyone.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;What doesn't need to be annoying is the vast separation between facebook and the API applications.  For example, API apps could run within an area on profiles or as separate in-site modules, like groups.  This would create an externally developed &lt;a href="http://labs.fb.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="labs.fb.com"&gt;labs.fb.com&lt;/a&gt; environment.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Much more about Facebook, including stories I only know because I was an insider, at &lt;a&gt;FBbook.com&lt;/a&gt;, Inside Facebook.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Karel - The Facebook Book</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 18 Oct 2006 12:47:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: AlumWire &amp;#8211; Facebook Meets LinkedIn</title><link>http://mashable.com/2006/10/17/alumwire-facebook-meets-linkedin/#comment-5905904</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Adrian, Facebook does not allow you to do so.. It's illegal.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Emre Sokullu</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 18 Oct 2006 12:29:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: AlumWire &amp;#8211; Facebook Meets LinkedIn</title><link>http://mashable.com/2006/10/17/alumwire-facebook-meets-linkedin/#comment-5905903</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Is it just me or is this Facebook API stuff extremely annoying for the end-user? Why can't these guys automate the Facebook login so a user doesn't have to fly over to Facebook to login and then get redirected back again? Gosh, this seems so Web 1.0.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Adrian</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 18 Oct 2006 05:57:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: AlumWire &amp;#8211; Facebook Meets LinkedIn</title><link>http://mashable.com/2006/10/17/alumwire-facebook-meets-linkedin/#comment-5905902</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The problem with this type of service is that many universities and alumni organizations have launched or are launching their own private, offical social networks. For obvious reasons these will get the traction much more easily than something like AlumWire.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">SkepticBoy</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 18 Oct 2006 02:14:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: AlumWire &amp;#8211; Facebook Meets LinkedIn</title><link>http://mashable.com/2006/10/17/alumwire-facebook-meets-linkedin/#comment-5905901</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Pete, why don't you check these claims. I'm sure the site owner would be more than glad to answer your questions, but not mines :)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Emre Sokullu</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 18 Oct 2006 00:54:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: AlumWire &amp;#8211; Facebook Meets LinkedIn</title><link>http://mashable.com/2006/10/17/alumwire-facebook-meets-linkedin/#comment-5905900</link><description>&lt;p&gt;PS. I'm pretty sure that AlumWire was developed first, and support for Facebook logins added later - didn't want to imply it was just a feeder business.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Pete Cashmore</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 17 Oct 2006 22:43:03 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>