http://mashable.disqus.com/Internet and Technology News - Mashable is the world’s largest blog focused exclusively on Web 2.0 and Social Networking news. With more than 5 million monthly pageviews, Mashable is the most prolific blog reviewing new Web sites and services, publishing breaking news on what’s new on the web.enSun, 03 Aug 2008 23:07:03 -0000http://mashable.com/2007/10/30/opensocial/#comment-5983646<p>@c4: I loled =P</p>dehdeshSun, 03 Aug 2008 23:07:03 -0000http://mashable.com/2007/10/30/opensocial/#comment-5983644<p>Check here <a href="http://opensocialapplist.com/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://opensocialapplist.com/">http://opensocialapplist.com/</a> for updates on OpenSocial apps</p>JoeThu, 01 Nov 2007 19:27:50 -0000http://mashable.com/2007/10/30/opensocial/#comment-5983643<p>A comment that is neither witty NOR insulting:</p><p>"...neither Facebook and MySpace don’t need to be a part of OpenSocial."</p><p>"...neither Facebook and MySpace don’t need to be a part of OpenSocial."</p><p>"...neither Facebook and MySpace don’t need to be a part of OpenSocial."</p><p>"...neither Facebook and MySpace don’t need to be a part of OpenSocial."</p><p>Sincerely,</p><p>Chief of Police, Grammar P.D.</p>c4Wed, 31 Oct 2007 11:51:42 -0000http://mashable.com/2007/10/30/opensocial/#comment-5983642<p>I love how this enterprising reporter got Flixster's name wrong. Good one, NYT. Keeping up on your unique standard of journalism, I see. Did anyone bother to check that Frixster doesn't exist? Or was the editorial team too busy counting its profits from downsizing all the copy editors to notice?</p>cuffsharkWed, 31 Oct 2007 09:43:33 -0000http://mashable.com/2007/10/30/opensocial/#comment-5983641<p>I agree, I think this should be pretty sweet, and we'll see even more developers since all those who avoided learn FBML will get in on it.</p><p>again, I'm just really interested in seeing how this effects Ning more than the other networks.</p>AlexMercedWed, 31 Oct 2007 06:51:36 -0000http://mashable.com/2007/10/30/opensocial/#comment-5983640<p>I think this will hurt Facebook. Barrier to entry for other social networks will be much lower and niche communities will thrive. Facebook are going to have to decide whether they open up their social graph or not and, if they don't, sooner or later people will start to migrate away.</p>Jack FairhallWed, 31 Oct 2007 06:10:00 -0000http://mashable.com/2007/10/30/opensocial/#comment-5983639<p>Sounds like application developers can now easily milk the long tail of web 2.0 social networks</p>MarkusWed, 31 Oct 2007 05:32:45 -0000http://mashable.com/2007/10/30/opensocial/#comment-5983638<p>@mrshl, agreed. should have let the new guy mark post on this one.</p>word mrshlWed, 31 Oct 2007 03:30:36 -0000http://mashable.com/2007/10/30/opensocial/#comment-5983637<p>This post was completely free of content. The coup de grace was your decision not to elaborate on the weakness of Google's solution vs. Facebook. Will Google's distributed approach best Facebook's walled garden?</p><p>Mashable's expert analysis: "Nope."</p>mrshlWed, 31 Oct 2007 02:13:12 -0000http://mashable.com/2007/10/30/opensocial/#comment-5983636<p>I'm especially excited to hear how this will work along with ning</p>AlexMercedWed, 31 Oct 2007 00:57:08 -0000http://mashable.com/2007/10/30/opensocial/#comment-5983635<p>No doubt this will put the hurt on Facebook. Probably more damaging than the MySpace API.</p>PeteWed, 31 Oct 2007 00:47:12 -0000http://mashable.com/2007/10/30/opensocial/#comment-5983634<p>Sounds interesting, but <a href="http://code.google.com/apis/opensocial" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://code.google.com/apis/opensocial">http://code.google.com/apis...</a> is 404...</p>d0nrumataWed, 31 Oct 2007 00:43:29 -0000