<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Mashable - The Social Media Guide - Latest Comments in Dovetail.tv to Pay Filmmakers $0.10 per Download</title><link>http://mashable.disqus.com/</link><description>Internet and Technology News - Mashable is the world’s largest blog focused exclusively on Web 2.0 and Social Networking news. With more than 5 million monthly pageviews, Mashable is the most prolific blog reviewing new Web sites and services, publishing breaking news on what’s new on the web.</description><atom:link href="https://mashable.disqus.com/thread_6868/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Jan 2007 18:05:44 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Dovetail.tv to Pay Filmmakers $0.10 per Download</title><link>http://mashable.com/2007/01/10/dovetail-tv/#comment-5919296</link><description>&lt;p&gt;how are they going to pay for this.  are there any other stipulations for getting paid. do you have to reach a certain amount of views.  doesnt seem viable to me unless they have google sized pockets.  i've been on dovetail and find it ok.  i like the fact that the description of the film appears over the interface of the videoplayer bf you click on it.  thats about it.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">john griffin</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 11 Jan 2007 18:05:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Dovetail.tv to Pay Filmmakers $0.10 per Download</title><link>http://mashable.com/2007/01/10/dovetail-tv/#comment-5919295</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Um, look at some of the top videos at YouTube - millions of views. How on earth would they be able to afford doling out something like $100,000 for potentially each successful video? That sounds ridiculously infeasible!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anonymous</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 10 Jan 2007 21:53:31 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>