<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Mashable - The Social Media Guide - Latest Comments in 2008/07/20/nyt-wsj-business-war/</title><link>http://mashable.disqus.com/</link><description>Internet and Technology News - Mashable is the world’s largest blog focused exclusively on Web 2.0 and Social Networking news. With more than 5 million monthly pageviews, Mashable is the most prolific blog reviewing new Web sites and services, publishing breaking news on what’s new on the web.</description><atom:link href="https://mashable.disqus.com/thread_68238/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 09:00:27 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: 2008/07/20/nyt-wsj-business-war/</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/07/20/nyt-wsj-business-war/#comment-6012206</link><description>&lt;p&gt;A longtime reader of the Wall St. Journal, I cannot stand the new redesign and content focus. The paper has become far less relevant to helping me glean large business trends, case studies and the like. Further, where the paper had an inviolable line between news and editorial, it's blurring. And I wonder out loud if the intent isn't to make it the FOX News of print media.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Interestingly, where I had been a casual reader of the NYT, I now read it first and more thoroughly. What they have done with the business section is great, and I spend more time on that.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I'm deeply dismayed with the direction of the Journal.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jennifer Naylor</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 09:00:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 2008/07/20/nyt-wsj-business-war/</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/07/20/nyt-wsj-business-war/#comment-6012205</link><description>&lt;p&gt;NYT has quite a bit of cash, too. And the WSJ will have a tough time getting the reach that NYT has. I don't mean readership, which WSJ actually has more of, at least in paper form. I mean the amount of content delivered in a given day.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;As for their websites, NYT definitely trumps &lt;a href="http://WSJ.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="WSJ.com"&gt;WSJ.com&lt;/a&gt;. I look forward to seeing what WSJ does with the planned refresh for the autumn.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">PaulGlazowski</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 08:58:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 2008/07/20/nyt-wsj-business-war/</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/07/20/nyt-wsj-business-war/#comment-6012204</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The WSJ has one big advantage, and that is Murdoch's deep pockets. No way the NYT can fight that. If Murdoch decides to make the WSJ free online, the game is as good as over for the NYT. Don't see that happening soon, though.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ling</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 04:53:04 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>