<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Mashable - The Social Media Guide - Latest Comments in Google&amp;#8217;s Lively: Another &amp;#8216;What If&amp;#8217; at Google?</title><link>http://mashable.disqus.com/</link><description>Internet and Technology News - Mashable is the world’s largest blog focused exclusively on Web 2.0 and Social Networking news. With more than 5 million monthly pageviews, Mashable is the most prolific blog reviewing new Web sites and services, publishing breaking news on what’s new on the web.</description><atom:link href="https://mashable.disqus.com/thread_6727/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 12:38:01 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Google&amp;#8217;s Lively: Another &amp;#8216;What If&amp;#8217; at Google?</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/07/18/google-lively-another-what-if/#comment-6011906</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Nice Posting , MITS Engineering College,Best Institute in Orissa, India&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">MITS Engineering college</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 12:38:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google&amp;#8217;s Lively: Another &amp;#8216;What If&amp;#8217; at Google?</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/07/18/google-lively-another-what-if/#comment-6011904</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I have to ask why is the best free email service a distant third?&lt;br&gt;While I agree gmail offers a superior email experience the reason it is a distant third is rather obvious. Yahoo Mail, Hotmail have been around since the early days of the web while gmail has only been available for about four years. AOL has been fenced off for years and has only recently opened itself up to the web.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;It seems users would rather stick with the familiarity,certainty of an email address they've used for years, even for a service as superior as gmail might be instead of having to deal with the hassle of migrating contacts, email subscriptions, uncertainty,unfamiliarity with a new service.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">x00x</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 19 Jul 2008 10:52:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google&amp;#8217;s Lively: Another &amp;#8216;What If&amp;#8217; at Google?</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/07/18/google-lively-another-what-if/#comment-6011903</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Great post&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">nafnosseb</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 19 Jul 2008 08:32:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google&amp;#8217;s Lively: Another &amp;#8216;What If&amp;#8217; at Google?</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/07/18/google-lively-another-what-if/#comment-6011902</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Good post &amp;amp; discussion..&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Although on the surface, cartoon chat seems pretty far off from Google's core business, on the other hand virtual worlds ARE going to be very large and mainstream within the next to a few years.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;For them its a chance to be seen as a infrastructure platform for the space - and take the advertising revenue that come as brands want to interact with users hanging out in them.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;They have in some ways leapfrogged other existing players and credit to them for that.  However how much ongoing effort they put into this platform especially given their need to manage costs will be interesting..&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Simon Newstead</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 19 Jul 2008 05:28:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google&amp;#8217;s Lively: Another &amp;#8216;What If&amp;#8217; at Google?</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/07/18/google-lively-another-what-if/#comment-6011901</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I did think Google Checkout wasn't really living up to its potential. It could easily give Paypal a run for its money, but they seem to not want to open it up and push people to use it.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ling</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 19 Jul 2008 02:22:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google&amp;#8217;s Lively: Another &amp;#8216;What If&amp;#8217; at Google?</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/07/18/google-lively-another-what-if/#comment-6011900</link><description>&lt;p&gt;BB &amp;amp; others,&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I agree there is great potential with Lively.  It will be fun to see if it takes off and really sets Google apart beyond search &amp;amp; ads.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Synergy with Google's Checkout could be a good play.  Lots of possibilities there.  Maybe Google could hold the standard for virtual currency. Who knows?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Bernard Moon</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 23:28:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google&amp;#8217;s Lively: Another &amp;#8216;What If&amp;#8217; at Google?</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/07/18/google-lively-another-what-if/#comment-6011899</link><description>&lt;p&gt;@SocialJulio&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Yes, it will be interesting to see how Lively develops over the course the year.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;And I enjoyed your post and Orrorin's post.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Bernard Moon</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 23:23:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google&amp;#8217;s Lively: Another &amp;#8216;What If&amp;#8217; at Google?</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/07/18/google-lively-another-what-if/#comment-6011898</link><description>&lt;p&gt;It could be another "What if," yes there are many possibilities. Lively has some hurdles, but I think they have a headstart with the embedding feature. It's what makes Lively stand out from other 3D chats. Their lack of economy and a "world" do hurt it in comparison to Second Life, but I do think some type of economy is coming (possibly with Google Checkout?).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Hopefully it won't follow the footsteps of Froogle or Orkut and can jump out even further. But now that they released it so early, other 3D chats may be offering more web-based solutions to compete with Lively's embedding feature.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Thanks.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">BB</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 22:51:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google&amp;#8217;s Lively: Another &amp;#8216;What If&amp;#8217; at Google?</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/07/18/google-lively-another-what-if/#comment-6011897</link><description>&lt;p&gt;that was very polite post saying GOOGLE's product SUCK :-) nice one!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Random Joe</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 21:06:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google&amp;#8217;s Lively: Another &amp;#8216;What If&amp;#8217; at Google?</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/07/18/google-lively-another-what-if/#comment-6011896</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Sometimes in the middle of worshiping Google we forget some of the missed opportunities. You've done a great job pointing these out.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Gmail is indeed a very cool service. Why they kept it as invitation only is a mystery. I would think that most of the users came on due to the large space they offered - once that gap closed there was really no reason to jump. For a lot of people switching e-mail after a few years is hard to do. I still maintain my hotmail account - which many many of my contacts still use to contact me.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I tested out Lively and thought it was pretty lame to be honest with you. It's so clunky and hard to use - you can tell it's in alpha stages. Why they released it now before more advances I have no idea.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Shailesh Ghimire</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 18:39:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google&amp;#8217;s Lively: Another &amp;#8216;What If&amp;#8217; at Google?</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/07/18/google-lively-another-what-if/#comment-6011895</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Bernard, I agree with most of your points, however, Google might be using Lively as a simulation, testing a new environment for something bigger to come. With semantic search engines beginning to surface, Google may be looking for an alternative using virtual worlds and 3D technology. I also wrote a post about Lively yesterday and I invite you to have a look at my own vision.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.orrorin.net/2008/07/google-decided-save-virtual-worlds/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.orrorin.net/2008/07/google-decided-save-virtual-worlds/"&gt;http://www.orrorin.net/2008...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Orrorin</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 18:24:58 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>