<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Mashable - The Social Media Guide - Latest Comments in Can TV.com Live Up to Its Name?</title><link>http://mashable.disqus.com/</link><description>Internet and Technology News - Mashable is the world’s largest blog focused exclusively on Web 2.0 and Social Networking news. With more than 5 million monthly pageviews, Mashable is the most prolific blog reviewing new Web sites and services, publishing breaking news on what’s new on the web.</description><atom:link href="https://mashable.disqus.com/thread_66395/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 05:41:42 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Can TV.com Live Up to Its Name?</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/01/12/tvcom/#comment-17108984</link><description>&lt;p&gt;THE EYES!&lt;br&gt;welcome to &lt;a href="http://www.tiffanyonlinestore.us/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.tiffanyonlinestore.us/"&gt;http://www.tiffanyonlinesto...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">tiffany</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 05:41:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Can TV.com Live Up to Its Name?</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/01/12/tvcom/#comment-6036699</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://Tv.com?" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="Tv.com?"&gt;Tv.com?&lt;/a&gt;  Hot Tranny Mess!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Don</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2009 22:29:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Can TV.com Live Up to Its Name?</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/01/12/tvcom/#comment-6036696</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I'm confused at the point of the article, is &lt;a href="http://TV.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="TV.com"&gt;TV.com&lt;/a&gt; adding extra features?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">M2Mz</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 18:31:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Can TV.com Live Up to Its Name?</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/01/12/tvcom/#comment-6036694</link><description>&lt;p&gt;plus, that ajax based search suck like no one&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">temp</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 12:33:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Can TV.com Live Up to Its Name?</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/01/12/tvcom/#comment-6036693</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://TV.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="TV.com"&gt;TV.com&lt;/a&gt; is horrible. Only some people may remember but it was TVTOME until Cnet purchased it. One of the biggest problems with it is the fact anyone was/is able to add information on a show. Instead of getting real facts about a show, you'd get half-truths, if that.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;This is why IMDB shines...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anrkist</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 12:01:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Can TV.com Live Up to Its Name?</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/01/12/tvcom/#comment-6036691</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I really hope &lt;a href="http://tv.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="tv.com"&gt;tv.com&lt;/a&gt; does well. With such a domain it would be sad for it to fail. What is better than a two-letter domain that clearly describes what it is?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Timothy</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 11:24:43 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>