-
Website
http://mashable.com/ -
Original page
http://mashable.com/2005/10/31/humans-vs-algorithms-who-should-edit-web-20/ -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
Robert Basil
142 comments · 8 points
-
Jennifer Van Grove
149 comments · 23 points
-
r0cketman22
317 comments · 52 points
-
rajagiri4
160 comments · 2 points
-
barringtonarch
150 comments · 4 points
-
-
Popular Threads
-
Enter the Zappos Sharing Happiness $3,000 Shopping Spree Giveaway Contest
5 hours ago · 94 comments
-
Head to Head: Chrome for Mac vs. Chrome for Windows
1 hour ago · 7 comments
-
iPhone App Offers Instant Speech-to-Text Transcription
3 hours ago · 17 comments
-
Your Next Car Radio Might Be Pandora
4 hours ago · 21 comments
-
Google Launches Chrome for Mac
6 hours ago · 28 comments
-
Enter the Zappos Sharing Happiness $3,000 Shopping Spree Giveaway Contest
The algorithms etc. are necessary though to support this effort. I've been thinking about this one for a bit and will have more later. Think of it as how do computers enable the Wisdom of Crowds to be known?
Chris
http://www.ratcliffeblog.com/archives/2005/10/r...
I agree that Wink is a fine model. You may be wondering why we have a robot, Ned, as our mascot. Robots are fine when they are designed to be strictly under the control of human masters. Ned is wholly subservient to the needs of his overlords (i.e. future users of Tinfinger). The problems come when you design robots to act independently to create objects of economic worth (like Web pages) without any involvement by humans. That can only lead to Skynet.
And Chris, I'm stoked that you have been thinking about the subject. There needs to be much more of that.
I'm stoked to hear you use the word "stoked". There needs to be much more of that. :)
Wink is indeed a fine model, and I'm glad to hear Ned is kept under control. I hope that you feed and walk him regularly.