<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Mashable - The Social Media Guide - Latest Comments in Glam Reigns over iVillage as the No. 1 Network for Women</title><link>http://mashable.disqus.com/</link><description>Internet and Technology News - Mashable is the world’s largest blog focused exclusively on Web 2.0 and Social Networking news. With more than 5 million monthly pageviews, Mashable is the most prolific blog reviewing new Web sites and services, publishing breaking news on what’s new on the web.</description><atom:link href="https://mashable.disqus.com/thread_6198/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 02:21:07 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Glam Reigns over iVillage as the No. 1 Network for Women</title><link>http://mashable.com/2007/06/17/glam-number-one/#comment-13649079</link><description>&lt;p&gt;LOVE can be very difficult if your not matched up with the right zodiac sign. Each sign only has 4-6 other signs they match with for a LTR and marriage&lt;br&gt;Find out what your signs are at the click of a button&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Find your true ZODIAC MATCH!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;FREE lifetime membership!  Expires AUG 7th&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.ZodiacConnextion.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="www.ZodiacConnextion.com"&gt;www.ZodiacConnextion.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">myzcx</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 02:21:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Glam Reigns over iVillage as the No. 1 Network for Women</title><link>http://mashable.com/2007/06/17/glam-number-one/#comment-5951255</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Glamâ€™s aggressive promotion and advertising certainly is a trigger point for consumers, investors, and Wall Street analysts to scrutinize its claims.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Comscoreâ€™s report lumps media properties targeting â€œwomenâ€ in one category and ranks them. Their errors are twofold. The first is in ranking many very different media categories in one meaningless benchmark.  It should have at least broken it down into sub-categories such as Media Aggregator and Media Creator.  Media Aggregator being an entity aggregating the majority of content for which they donâ€™t own the copy-right, such as Glam.  Media Creator being an entity that owns the copyright of its contents.  Another red-flag is that Comscore only measures and reports traffic for companies that are its clients.  The double-counting issue would be more apparent to industry constituencies if Comscore measured all of the publisher properties, not just a subset of the Internet (i.e., clients of Comscore).  The other blog networks such as Hollywood Blogads, which shares visitors with Glam, might not be on the radar screen if these networks were not the clients of Comscore. It is an industry phenomenon that awaits a solution, a code of conductâ€¦or regulation.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The issue with Glam seems to be that it aggressively nudges the two irrelevant indicators to create a story for its business valuation!  In this blog entry â€œchief executive Samir Arora said he saw Glam headed toward a $500 million valuation, based on the value of comparable companies.â€â€¦ The only number Samir used to compare Glam with iVillage is the Comscoreâ€™s  visitor number.  But, the truth is that each visitor of iVillageâ€™s website brings 10x or 50x more advertising dollars than that of Glam, the reason being that iVillage owns all ad spaces associated with the webpage and/or visitor. On another hand, Glam Networkâ€™s bloggers webpageâ€™s ad spaces are offered to multiple blog networks, as well as Bloggerâ€™s direct advertisers.  This reduces its earning potential to at least 1/10 of iVillageâ€™s.  In additional, for each advertising dollar Glam receives, Glam has to pay a big cut to its bloggers. Glam only earns the advertising broker fee/commission fee in a sense for brokering the advertising sale to its bloggers.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Glamâ€™s aggressive advertising and promotion is heading toward pumping up its valuation for acquisition or IPO. Sounds familiar!  The Bubble is here! Or a deja vu of the ERRRRRON, the one that shall not be named.  VCs are jumping onto the bandwagon to perpetuate the myth because they expect a windfall from their investment.  However, at the end of day, after a few opportunistic players exploit the hype of uncorroborated reports, average consumers, future stock-holders, and Internet professionals are the ones who suffer from the aftermath of the economic bubbleâ€¦. a roller coaster Internet business climate.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">citizen.care</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 23 Jun 2007 14:16:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Glam Reigns over iVillage as the No. 1 Network for Women</title><link>http://mashable.com/2007/06/17/glam-number-one/#comment-5951254</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Glam is a content aggregator in the same category as these guys such as b5media ( &lt;a href="http://www.b5media.com/our-bloggers/)" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.b5media.com/our-bloggers/)"&gt;http://www.b5media.com/our-...&lt;/a&gt; and Shiny Media ( &lt;a href="http://www.shinymedia.com/about_shiny_media/index.html" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.shinymedia.com/about_shiny_media/index.html"&gt;http://www.shinymedia.com/a...&lt;/a&gt; ), but not as a content producer such as iVillage.  &lt;br&gt;Many blogs on Glam Network site is like this one&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://allieiswired.blogspot.com/2007/06/george-clooneys-secret-fling.html" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://allieiswired.blogspot.com/2007/06/george-clooneys-secret-fling.html"&gt;http://allieiswired.blogspo...&lt;/a&gt; &lt;br&gt;This blog also belong to BlogBurst Member Networks, as well as Hollywood Blogads Networksâ€¦.. What Glamâ€™s promotion and advertising are doing is CLAIMING that the traffic that it SHARED with other Blog-Networks such as BlogBurst and Hollywood Blogads, and many other blog networks, are truly GLAMâ€™s own traffic. It is murky and perhaps in violation federal and state laws against Fraud and False Advertising.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">anonymous</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 22 Jun 2007 14:56:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Glam Reigns over iVillage as the No. 1 Network for Women</title><link>http://mashable.com/2007/06/17/glam-number-one/#comment-5951253</link><description>&lt;p&gt;â€œItâ€™s great to hear Glam is doing well, but what happens if they lose some of their larger blogs from the network? 500 million seems a lot for a company that doesnâ€™t actually *own* anything. Valleywag picked up on that fairly early on (&lt;a href="http://valleywag.com/tech/truth-in-statistics/glamcoms-highprice-visitors-221938.php)" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://valleywag.com/tech/truth-in-statistics/glamcoms-highprice-visitors-221938.php)"&gt;http://valleywag.com/tech/t...&lt;/a&gt;. If one or more of their major league blogs decides to opt out of the network, taking all their nice page impressions with them, Glamâ€™s ad sales could take quite a hit. It seems like a bit of a fragile revenue stream to me.â€&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">dee azer</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 19 Jun 2007 16:33:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Glam Reigns over iVillage as the No. 1 Network for Women</title><link>http://mashable.com/2007/06/17/glam-number-one/#comment-5951252</link><description>&lt;p&gt;glamorous, thanks for the clue in. I just visited their site and this is some of the information you need ready to apply:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt; How often do you post to your blog?*&lt;br&gt;daily    4-6 times/week    2-3 times/week    once a week    monthly&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Do you have an RSS feed?* Yes    No&lt;br&gt;If yes, please paste code here:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;What's the monthly traffic on your blog?*&lt;br&gt;(If you need help getting traffic statistics for your blog, visit: &lt;a href="http://www.freestats.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="www.freestats.com"&gt;www.freestats.com&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://www.shinystat.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="www.shinystat.com"&gt;www.shinystat.com&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://www.statcounter.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="www.statcounter.com"&gt;www.statcounter.com&lt;/a&gt;, or another web traffic monitoring company.)&lt;br&gt;Page Views:&lt;br&gt;0-50,000 page views/month    more than 50,000 page views/month    donâ€™t know&lt;br&gt;Visitors:&lt;br&gt;0-2,500 visitors/month    more than 2,500 visitors/month    donâ€™t know&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">altamiranyc</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 19 Jun 2007 03:08:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Glam Reigns over iVillage as the No. 1 Network for Women</title><link>http://mashable.com/2007/06/17/glam-number-one/#comment-5951251</link><description>&lt;p&gt;to answer altamiranyc, I think they're more selective in terms of recruiting blogs, they only do higher traffic blogs these days. The ones who got in early stand to gain even though their traffic may not be that high.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">glamorous</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 18 Jun 2007 21:40:51 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Glam Reigns over iVillage as the No. 1 Network for Women</title><link>http://mashable.com/2007/06/17/glam-number-one/#comment-5951249</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Not to change the topic, but how does one get their blog featured on Glam?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">altamiranyc</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 18 Jun 2007 17:12:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Glam Reigns over iVillage as the No. 1 Network for Women</title><link>http://mashable.com/2007/06/17/glam-number-one/#comment-5951248</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Nice to read an article about the fashion industry here!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Craig A</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 18 Jun 2007 17:05:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Glam Reigns over iVillage as the No. 1 Network for Women</title><link>http://mashable.com/2007/06/17/glam-number-one/#comment-5951245</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Go Glam! I used to work for the site as an editorial assistant when they first launched, and I couldn't be happier for them. The site continues to get better and better and the people who work there are nothing short of amazing..hard-working, creative, passionate people. Good work!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mandy Kakavas</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 18 Jun 2007 12:01:10 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>