<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Mashable - The Social Media Guide - Latest Comments in Podcasting Giant Leo Laporte Chooses Stickam</title><link>http://mashable.disqus.com/</link><description>Internet and Technology News - Mashable is the world’s largest blog focused exclusively on Web 2.0 and Social Networking news. With more than 5 million monthly pageviews, Mashable is the most prolific blog reviewing new Web sites and services, publishing breaking news on what’s new on the web.</description><atom:link href="https://mashable.disqus.com/thread_6142/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2008 18:39:06 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Podcasting Giant Leo Laporte Chooses Stickam</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/06/04/leo-laporte-stickam/#comment-6005815</link><description>&lt;p&gt;aisofhyaiodfh&lt;br&gt;bcvbvlcl	&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://xn--pgbn7coj.xn----ymcae0df5a6fo.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://xn--pgbn7coj.xn----ymcae0df5a6fo.com"&gt;http://xn--pgbn7coj.xn----y...&lt;/a&gt;	&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://xn--ugb6bax.xn----ymcae0df5a6fo.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://xn--ugb6bax.xn----ymcae0df5a6fo.com"&gt;http://xn--ugb6bax.xn----ym...&lt;/a&gt;	&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://xn--ugbe7cuai.xn----ymcae0df5a6fo.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://xn--ugbe7cuai.xn----ymcae0df5a6fo.com"&gt;http://xn--ugbe7cuai.xn----...&lt;/a&gt;	&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://xn--wgb8aq.xn----ymcae0df5a6fo.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://xn--wgb8aq.xn----ymcae0df5a6fo.com"&gt;http://xn--wgb8aq.xn----ymc...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">gfgfgfg</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2008 18:39:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Podcasting Giant Leo Laporte Chooses Stickam</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/06/04/leo-laporte-stickam/#comment-6005814</link><description>&lt;p&gt;You chose the wrong provider. Sure, it looks slick but it doesn't work. See &lt;a href="http://ajpresto.blogspot.com/2008/07/stickam-support-doesnt.html" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://ajpresto.blogspot.com/2008/07/stickam-support-doesnt.html"&gt;http://ajpresto.blogspot.co...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Andrew Preston</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 26 Jul 2008 14:11:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Podcasting Giant Leo Laporte Chooses Stickam</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/06/04/leo-laporte-stickam/#comment-6005813</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Great! I hope both you and Stickam make much more than $100k a year and can laugh all the way to the bank about it!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;If you do - down the road, talk them into implementing some of the stuff those who will eventually want to follow in your footsteps could use? &lt;a href="http://tinyurl.com/4w4dah" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://tinyurl.com/4w4dah"&gt;http://tinyurl.com/4w4dah&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Meanwhile - I'm hoping that the audience you draw will only increase and it will positively impact Stickam's stability.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">GeekMommy</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2008 22:55:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Podcasting Giant Leo Laporte Chooses Stickam</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/06/04/leo-laporte-stickam/#comment-6005812</link><description>&lt;p&gt;After an exhaustive search for a platform that works well with an actual live-broadcast show with multiple guests, ease of production and technical control, and stability - I can well understand why Leo would choose Stickam.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;If you can find a live-video platform that doesn't crash from time-to-time under the weight of users that Leo's show brings to the table, I'd be impressed.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Stickam has had it's image issues in the past - but how else would you suggest they remedy that other than to attract bigger names like Leo and work with them to re-engineer the focus and the type of offerings they have?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;If Leo &amp;amp; Stickam make a million dollars a year thru this revenue sharing deal more power to them. I can only hope that this partnership will mean that Stickam gets more resources to bring a greater stability to their platform and to take the lead in the live-streaming market.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">GeekMommy</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2008 22:43:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Podcasting Giant Leo Laporte Chooses Stickam</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/06/04/leo-laporte-stickam/#comment-6005811</link><description>&lt;p&gt;My sources are anonymous, Daualipuff, and they'll remain that way unless one of them decides to step forward publicly with the information.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I was shown compelling documentation that a deal was being struck backing up the Valleywag story from a trusted source that has never burned me in the past.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I've actually tried over the years numerous times to contact Leo via email and other means, and never recieved a response.  I generally took it as a sign he was busy, and I was a nobody. Particularly, when all the press release posts hit the wire at 3 and 4 in the morning, I had doubts that any of these parties involved would be answering much of anything at that hour.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mark "Rizzn" Hopkins</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2008 21:08:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Podcasting Giant Leo Laporte Chooses Stickam</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/06/04/leo-laporte-stickam/#comment-6005810</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Ouch!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Not sure what you have against Stickam Scott, but they are nice guys - have you met them?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The widescreen aspect ratio for Leo's show is the best on any live streaming site.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Andy Oliver / Stickam PR&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Andy Oliver</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2008 19:00:51 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Podcasting Giant Leo Laporte Chooses Stickam</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/06/04/leo-laporte-stickam/#comment-6005809</link><description>&lt;p&gt;OK people - Stickam does not own any porn sites! Stickam is &lt;a href="http://Stickam.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="Stickam.com"&gt;Stickam.com&lt;/a&gt;. Check out the site and let me know if you find any porn! :)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Andy Oliver / Stickam PR&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Andy Oliver</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2008 18:55:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Podcasting Giant Leo Laporte Chooses Stickam</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/06/04/leo-laporte-stickam/#comment-6005808</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Who the hell are your sources, some friend sitting on your couch?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I can't believe you'd use a ValleyWag article as a launching off point, then have the audacity to NOT make any effort to contact Leo regarding this deal.  You've essentially admitted that you didn't get the real story from him solely because you didn't have any of his contact information.  Fantastic.  Perhaps next time there's a government scandal, we can wait for THEM to come forward and tell us what the real deal is.  Right?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;You may not call yourself a journalist, but by virtue of working for Mashable, you are the purveyor of information.  One would think that information would be verified fact.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dualipuff</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2008 09:45:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Podcasting Giant Leo Laporte Chooses Stickam</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/06/04/leo-laporte-stickam/#comment-6005807</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I watch leo on &lt;a href="http://twitlive.tv" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="twitlive.tv"&gt;twitlive.tv&lt;/a&gt; quite often and you really don't have to worry about the stickam chat. It's moderated pretty well. And the quality of leo's setup is a lot better then anything on ustream. The other day he had 5000 people watching without a problem. The video is 16:9, super high quality, he has a switcher with multiple camera angles and 3 computers that he can switch between. Watch &lt;a href="http://twitlive.tv" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="twitlive.tv"&gt;twitlive.tv&lt;/a&gt; just once and you will be convinced that he picked the right service.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">CompMike</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2008 02:32:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Podcasting Giant Leo Laporte Chooses Stickam</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/06/04/leo-laporte-stickam/#comment-6005806</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Leo did a twitter poll a while back asking people what one he should use and if I remember right, stickcam was last on the list almost, and ustream was tops. Sad to say it but I can't find myself heading to stickcam to view him, most of the chats over there are full of spammers. If leo and his IRC people had half an effort ustream would have set his stream page to display his life chat. Sad he sold himself out for a terrible service&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Boredcollegekid</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2008 23:20:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Podcasting Giant Leo Laporte Chooses Stickam</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/06/04/leo-laporte-stickam/#comment-6005805</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I'd agree.  No naked conversations, please. :-p&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mark "Rizzn" Hopkins</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2008 19:42:51 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Podcasting Giant Leo Laporte Chooses Stickam</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/06/04/leo-laporte-stickam/#comment-6005804</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Paying top talent to come to your site and use it exclusively is pretty normal - akin, I'd say, to CBS telling Couric as part of her contract to she must be only on CBS.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mark "Rizzn" Hopkins</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2008 19:42:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Podcasting Giant Leo Laporte Chooses Stickam</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/06/04/leo-laporte-stickam/#comment-6005803</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Leo - pass me your info, and you'll definitely be first on my list of people to call next time a story involves you. I promise I won't go all fan-boy on yah. :-p (mark@mashable.com)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Seriously though, I'm one of your biggest fans, and even if it did involve them shipping you a bentley a month, I'd be happy for ya. I'm looking forward to see how TwitLive develops.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mark "Rizzn" Hopkins</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2008 19:37:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Podcasting Giant Leo Laporte Chooses Stickam</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/06/04/leo-laporte-stickam/#comment-6005802</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Mark, you should have asked me - I would have told you the truth. Stickam has _not_ sent me any check. We have a revenue sharing deal that I hope will generate MORE than $100,000 a year, but I'm not buying that Bently any time soon. Streaming video numbers are much much lower than audio podcast numbers, at least for now.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Watch &lt;a href="http://twitlive.tv" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="twitlive.tv"&gt;twitlive.tv&lt;/a&gt; for 10 minutes then tell me I chose the wrong provider!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Leo Laporte</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2008 19:25:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Podcasting Giant Leo Laporte Chooses Stickam</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/06/04/leo-laporte-stickam/#comment-6005801</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I just hope Leo doesn't take his shirt off like all the girls on there!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">NewMediaGoddess</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2008 10:27:19 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Podcasting Giant Leo Laporte Chooses Stickam</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/06/04/leo-laporte-stickam/#comment-6005800</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Does Leo realize the same company that owns Stickam owns about 7 porn sites?!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I can't imagine how this is good for his brand!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Leo Laporte "The Porn Guy" - Guess in the end the money was too much but feels kinda like dirty money to me.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Adam Koffman</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2008 09:20:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Podcasting Giant Leo Laporte Chooses Stickam</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/06/04/leo-laporte-stickam/#comment-6005799</link><description>&lt;p&gt;HAH! What a crock of shit. They PAY someone to make their site legit and to try to sweep their other sites off the map. Does Leo know what they do on the Other Floors of the Bank Building? Stickam has scared away lots of great talent over the two years and have not developed their platform to it's potential. Sad Really. But if Leo can use it to his advantage then let him. But I Doubt that even he can lead any change there.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Scott</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2008 07:32:34 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>