<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Mashable - The Social Media Guide - Latest Comments in Rise of the Rose Bashers?</title><link>http://mashable.disqus.com/</link><description>Internet and Technology News - Mashable is the world’s largest blog focused exclusively on Web 2.0 and Social Networking news. With more than 5 million monthly pageviews, Mashable is the most prolific blog reviewing new Web sites and services, publishing breaking news on what’s new on the web.</description><atom:link href="https://mashable.disqus.com/thread_5977/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sun, 02 Nov 2008 18:40:58 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Rise of the Rose Bashers?</title><link>http://mashable.com/2007/06/30/rise-of-the-rose-bashers/#comment-5953448</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I found this post through Google and I thought you might like to be one of the first to comment on my new site.  Pass it on...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">The Heavy</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 02 Nov 2008 18:40:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Rise of the Rose Bashers?</title><link>http://mashable.com/2007/06/30/rise-of-the-rose-bashers/#comment-5953446</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I agree with you 100%&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">kavak yelleri</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 23 Nov 2007 00:17:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Rise of the Rose Bashers?</title><link>http://mashable.com/2007/06/30/rise-of-the-rose-bashers/#comment-5953445</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I waited one week to get an invite and in my view it is worth waiting. Even though I am using fastest connection and instant messenger to get updates from my contacts until gmail introduced online archiving of our conversation it was really a problem when I am shutting between different clients in our office or my personal computers. Twitter solved the problem to some extent and now Pownce is expanding on the same success formula adding few more features. So if some people feel unpleasant about invitation only registration let them feel more because these days people dont stay long in any service except in mail and messengers. Let the company choose its own policy for registration. I got my invite through &lt;a href="http://www.inviteshare.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="www.inviteshare.com"&gt;www.inviteshare.com&lt;/a&gt; by a unknown person who is generous enough to share one of his 6 invites.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mury BVNS</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 04 Aug 2007 01:46:51 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Rise of the Rose Bashers?</title><link>http://mashable.com/2007/06/30/rise-of-the-rose-bashers/#comment-5953444</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I was a sceptic too, but having tested Pownce I'd have to say it's really well build. It's  easy to use and the interaction has been well thought out. The only downside to me is the lack of a mobile version, and if it comes it'd better not be iPhone-only like Digg did.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;@Yoda: AIR is a new technology in the same way flash once was. It WILL become a standard in the next year or so. Pownce is a great platform to deploy this technology on, as it has a tech-savvy crowd consisting of primarily early adopters and such is the first step in general acceptation of the technology.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Stefchenko</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2007 06:28:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Rise of the Rose Bashers?</title><link>http://mashable.com/2007/06/30/rise-of-the-rose-bashers/#comment-5953443</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I agree with you 100%. I couldn't have said it better myself!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Shawn Rubel</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 01 Jul 2007 14:12:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Rise of the Rose Bashers?</title><link>http://mashable.com/2007/06/30/rise-of-the-rose-bashers/#comment-5953442</link><description>&lt;p&gt;It's because he uses his site, which is supposed to be community driven to force junk down our throats. Pounce does the same thing AIM/GTalk/ICQ does, only costs $$$ if you want to do it for more than 10 megs. Plus you have to get a RUNTIME THAT NO ONE HAS!!! WTF is AIR? It may be pretty, but who cares, this technology was created like 10 years, they just threw pastel colors on it and used a ton of javascript....which, if anyone hasn't checked lately, isn't the best thing in the way of security. Stop being wow'd by pretty colors and rounded edges..ask yourself, why on earth do i need this? before installing/using a web 2.0 app&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Yoda</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 01 Jul 2007 04:46:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Rise of the Rose Bashers?</title><link>http://mashable.com/2007/06/30/rise-of-the-rose-bashers/#comment-5953440</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Digg commentors are assholes -- that's all.  If you think they're being harsh now, just imagine if Kevin Rose were a black woman (or look at any other Digg story that portrays women or minorities positively).&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">jamier</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 30 Jun 2007 21:50:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Rise of the Rose Bashers?</title><link>http://mashable.com/2007/06/30/rise-of-the-rose-bashers/#comment-5953439</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I wouldn't sweat it if I were him.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;And, I'd hardly call him a "celebrity" - it doesn't count if it's in Silicon Valley and nowhere else. Nobody knows - or cares - who he is.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">patricia</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 30 Jun 2007 16:57:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Rise of the Rose Bashers?</title><link>http://mashable.com/2007/06/30/rise-of-the-rose-bashers/#comment-5953437</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Ever since the HD-DVD debacle digg commenter's tone has noticeably changed.  The best way I can describe it is a 'take no prisoners' approach.  digg users right now are a rather unwieldy and angry crowd, and Kevin Rose's launch of Pownce, is just another easy target.  There is a powerful catalyst going on in the digg community, one that in my opinion will lead to its own destruction.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Shannon</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 30 Jun 2007 16:36:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Rise of the Rose Bashers?</title><link>http://mashable.com/2007/06/30/rise-of-the-rose-bashers/#comment-5953435</link><description>&lt;p&gt;i can't believe i've done it... i was apparently the first one to say the site has absolutely no substance and it's pointless and not to mention useless...&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;i'm receiving emails in bunches asking me what i think of other sites or even their own site... i have no blog of my own, so i think most other sites are safe for as long as i don't write bad comments on most popular blogs like this...&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;i can't believe i've killed a site! (well it will be dead soon)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Bam</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 30 Jun 2007 14:23:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Rise of the Rose Bashers?</title><link>http://mashable.com/2007/06/30/rise-of-the-rose-bashers/#comment-5953434</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Holy crap, yes. Digg commenters, in the aggregate, are whiny, inarticulate, and smugly confident in their own ignorance. The only thing more annoying than reading Digg commenters (and watching them shout down any dissenters) are the even dumber comments I read on YouTube.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I love the idea of commenting on the comments and bumping them up and down, but the feature is a lot more enjoyable when the site has a somewhat intelligent and respectful commentariat. That's nowhere to be found on Digg.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Marshall P</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 30 Jun 2007 13:53:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Rise of the Rose Bashers?</title><link>http://mashable.com/2007/06/30/rise-of-the-rose-bashers/#comment-5953433</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I'm guessing the observation is based on the comment system, aka the haven of unintelligence. Ive rarely read quality feedback on any site outside of a few of hundreds on digg posts.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;People love to hate initially, I disagree although this post was speculation.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dan McGrady</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 30 Jun 2007 09:52:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Rise of the Rose Bashers?</title><link>http://mashable.com/2007/06/30/rise-of-the-rose-bashers/#comment-5953432</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Besides SERGEY, LARRY, GATES, he is one of the few Geek Entrepreneurs to become a celebrity - and without really trying to become one.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;And he is probably the only one to become an almost instant celebrity - while with the others it took several years and aggressive self promotion.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;It is interesting how the internet public will react so strongly to just a few figures but show little personal interest in others with similar creative achievements: eg. YouTube, MySpace, Yahoo, Facebook, Twitter, Slashdot, Delicious, Amazon, eBay, etc..&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;It will be interesting  ten years from now to see how Digg develops and what new career paths he takes.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">SearchEngines</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 30 Jun 2007 08:59:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Rise of the Rose Bashers?</title><link>http://mashable.com/2007/06/30/rise-of-the-rose-bashers/#comment-5953431</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I've always said that criticism should only come from the wiser. I'm going to wait until I can sign up and sign in before I start airing my opinions.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://thelump.wordpress.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://thelump.wordpress.com"&gt;the lump&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Andy Winn</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 30 Jun 2007 07:13:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Rise of the Rose Bashers?</title><link>http://mashable.com/2007/06/30/rise-of-the-rose-bashers/#comment-5953430</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I think you have pretty much got it covered there. Pownce might be late to the party but it looks amazing. Invite only means it doesn't get too big too quick. And I think it's a classic case of "build 'em up, knock 'em down" with regards to Rose.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;We'll see. I'm off to try and beg an invite. Again!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">The Upsetter</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 30 Jun 2007 05:48:28 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>