<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Mashable - The Social Media Guide - Latest Comments in Microsoft Jumping Into Social Bookmarking</title><link>http://mashable.disqus.com/</link><description>Internet and Technology News - Mashable is the world’s largest blog focused exclusively on Web 2.0 and Social Networking news. With more than 5 million monthly pageviews, Mashable is the most prolific blog reviewing new Web sites and services, publishing breaking news on what’s new on the web.</description><atom:link href="https://mashable.disqus.com/thread_58674/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 02:26:24 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Microsoft Jumping Into Social Bookmarking</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/05/27/microsoft-social-bookmarks/#comment-6004902</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I think the same as SEO Blog, will it be better then &lt;a href="http://del.ico.us" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="del.ico.us"&gt;del.ico.us&lt;/a&gt;, Mister Wong... ?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">buck-info</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 02:26:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Microsoft Jumping Into Social Bookmarking</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/05/27/microsoft-social-bookmarks/#comment-6004901</link><description>&lt;p&gt;nice&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Tom</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 10 Aug 2008 16:25:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Microsoft Jumping Into Social Bookmarking</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/05/27/microsoft-social-bookmarks/#comment-6004900</link><description>&lt;p&gt;That's really amazing. But thing is, will it be able to cover up the Bookmarking Giants, Digg, Reditt and all..&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">SEO Blog</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2008 10:36:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Microsoft Jumping Into Social Bookmarking</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/05/27/microsoft-social-bookmarks/#comment-6004899</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi John Martin&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;First, it's no surprise to see Microsoft entering into this arena.  Actually one might ask why the sleeping giant hasn't taken the plunge long ago.  And perhaps it's simply due to the size of the organization that Microsoft is.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Second, while you provide 3 different links each of them went to a basically similar setup platform with the header graphics changing.  If we sign into one does that mean that we have signed into them all or are they really running these 3 separage projects as 3 exclusively unrelated separate projects?  Further, is their an advantage to working with all 3 as oppossed to just selecting 1 to run with?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">SEOGuy</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 27 Jul 2008 11:43:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Microsoft Jumping Into Social Bookmarking</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/05/27/microsoft-social-bookmarks/#comment-6004898</link><description>&lt;p&gt;looks ok&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">SuperMan</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 11:26:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Microsoft Jumping Into Social Bookmarking</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/05/27/microsoft-social-bookmarks/#comment-6004896</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Social bookmarking is now live!&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://msdnbookmarks.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://msdnbookmarks.com"&gt;http://msdnbookmarks.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://technetbookmarks.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://technetbookmarks.com"&gt;http://technetbookmarks.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://expressionbookmarks.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://expressionbookmarks.com"&gt;http://expressionbookmarks.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Martin</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2008 14:40:51 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Microsoft Jumping Into Social Bookmarking</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/05/27/microsoft-social-bookmarks/#comment-6004895</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Way not?&amp;gt;&lt;br&gt;Some times take longer to see whats going around with a new market, and I agree with Microsoft!&lt;br&gt;100%&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Hunter</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2008 09:46:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Microsoft Jumping Into Social Bookmarking</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/05/27/microsoft-social-bookmarks/#comment-6004894</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Seriously. Microsoft seems to be King of "late to the game" these days... My thoughts are they'll have a social network product in 2 years from now ;)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Adam Hirsch</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 12:06:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Microsoft Jumping Into Social Bookmarking</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/05/27/microsoft-social-bookmarks/#comment-6004893</link><description>&lt;p&gt;talk about late to the game&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Marc Beharry</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 11:06:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Microsoft Jumping Into Social Bookmarking</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/05/27/microsoft-social-bookmarks/#comment-6004892</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Microsoft are running out of ideas faster than they can: 1. think they really shit new ones up, or: 2. rip off pre-existing old ideas.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Lamentable...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Wayne Smallman</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 06:34:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Microsoft Jumping Into Social Bookmarking</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/05/27/microsoft-social-bookmarks/#comment-6004891</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Very interesting to know that Microsoft now think those "free" web sites, really makes diference... the MS problem is that they think only to revenew...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ruben Zevallos Jr.</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 06:18:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Microsoft Jumping Into Social Bookmarking</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/05/27/microsoft-social-bookmarks/#comment-6004890</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Looks boring. Needs Moar Cowbell!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">LaLaFuFu</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 17:14:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Microsoft Jumping Into Social Bookmarking</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/05/27/microsoft-social-bookmarks/#comment-6004888</link><description>&lt;p&gt;This seems like one of those "whatever" MS announcements at first, as MS have been pretty late to really 'get' the web and their web product offerings are typically me-too copies of others successful web products.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Coming so late to the party, I'm interested to see what MS will bring to the table - there are a few areas (IMO) that social bookmarking needs to improve on (ease of use, browser integration, semantic tagging) - I hope MS can address some of these areas.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Paul</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 16:41:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Microsoft Jumping Into Social Bookmarking</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/05/27/microsoft-social-bookmarks/#comment-6004887</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I wonder how this compares to last year's Microsoft Bookmarking system, Listas (&lt;a href="http://listas.labs.live.com/)?" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://listas.labs.live.com/)?"&gt;http://listas.labs.live.com/)?&lt;/a&gt;  That product was pretty underwhelming when I last looked at it, and has not seemed to penetrate the consciousness of the masses yet.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mike Koss</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 15:04:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Microsoft Jumping Into Social Bookmarking</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/05/27/microsoft-social-bookmarks/#comment-6004886</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Nothing novel ideas comes from Microsoft. All they are doing is copying and entering very late in the market.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Chris</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 14:18:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Microsoft Jumping Into Social Bookmarking</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/05/27/microsoft-social-bookmarks/#comment-6004885</link><description>&lt;p&gt;very true ... will be interesting to see how far Microsoft takes it.  Google launched a social bookmarking experiment of sorts a few months back that really didn't materialize into anything.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Adam Ostrow</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 12:51:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Microsoft Jumping Into Social Bookmarking</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/05/27/microsoft-social-bookmarks/#comment-6004884</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Wonder what took them so long?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Sharon Bray-McPherson</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 12:45:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Microsoft Jumping Into Social Bookmarking</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/05/27/microsoft-social-bookmarks/#comment-6004883</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Not that I'm saying it'll be a success, but the Yahoo! Buzz story should serve as a lesson to folks that might automatically discount these kinds of moves going forward. to wit:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://mashable.com/2008/02/26/yahoo-buzz-digg/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://mashable.com/2008/02/26/yahoo-buzz-digg/"&gt;http://mashable.com/2008/02...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://mashable.com/2008/05/13/yahoo-buzz-is-bigger-than-digg-according-to-comscore/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://mashable.com/2008/05/13/yahoo-buzz-is-bigger-than-digg-according-to-comscore/"&gt;http://mashable.com/2008/05...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;And &lt;a href="http://del.icio.us" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="del.icio.us"&gt;del.icio.us&lt;/a&gt; is pretty neglected, especially when compared with Digg.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Rob Larsen</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 12:45:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Microsoft Jumping Into Social Bookmarking</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/05/27/microsoft-social-bookmarks/#comment-6004882</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Makes sense. Make it easier for developers to build social bookmarks. Solid move.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.mofata.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.mofata.com"&gt;lessons in brevity&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ryan</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 12:44:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Microsoft Jumping Into Social Bookmarking</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/05/27/microsoft-social-bookmarks/#comment-6004881</link><description>&lt;p&gt;def a zzzzzzzzzzzzzzz&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Gary</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 12:38:15 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>