<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Mashable - The Social Media Guide - Latest Comments in Domain Owner of OpenSocial.com Cybersquatting?</title><link>http://mashable.disqus.com/</link><description>Internet and Technology News - Mashable is the world’s largest blog focused exclusively on Web 2.0 and Social Networking news. With more than 5 million monthly pageviews, Mashable is the most prolific blog reviewing new Web sites and services, publishing breaking news on what’s new on the web.</description><atom:link href="https://mashable.disqus.com/thread_5851/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2007 07:10:38 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Domain Owner of OpenSocial.com Cybersquatting?</title><link>http://mashable.com/2007/11/06/opensocial-domain/#comment-5984694</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Agreed, you knew very well that they weren't cybersquatting, and as that is actually now illegal under certain jurisdictions, it gives even more reason to not throw the term around.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I think you knew exactly what you were doing when you wrote it, and I notice you haven't changed the headline either.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Rob Walker</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2007 07:10:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Domain Owner of OpenSocial.com Cybersquatting?</title><link>http://mashable.com/2007/11/06/opensocial-domain/#comment-5984693</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Yup - certainly the wrong headline.  Interestingly, Google didn't register &lt;a href="http://opensocial.mobi" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="opensocial.mobi"&gt;opensocial.mobi&lt;/a&gt; until the evening before the launch.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Google doesn't need the domain name... there are enough inbound links to their site URL to make sure it's always going to be number one.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Rolf</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2007 04:08:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Domain Owner of OpenSocial.com Cybersquatting?</title><link>http://mashable.com/2007/11/06/opensocial-domain/#comment-5984692</link><description>&lt;p&gt;if you don't think it's cybersquatting, then don't use the term cybersquatting.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">julien</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2007 23:39:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Domain Owner of OpenSocial.com Cybersquatting?</title><link>http://mashable.com/2007/11/06/opensocial-domain/#comment-5984691</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Doubtful if this ever ends up in court.  Doesn't seem like there are any legal issues related to VastPark and Google's OpenSocial, unless Joy wants to take Google to court for using the name.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Sorry if the title seems sensationalized.  Only wanted to point out that Joy isn't cybersquatting, but could use this situation to help spread the word about his own company.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">KristenNicole</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2007 23:20:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Domain Owner of OpenSocial.com Cybersquatting?</title><link>http://mashable.com/2007/11/06/opensocial-domain/#comment-5984690</link><description>&lt;p&gt;ahh NO!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;to quote wonderer: "not even close"&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ron Sheridan</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2007 21:54:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Domain Owner of OpenSocial.com Cybersquatting?</title><link>http://mashable.com/2007/11/06/opensocial-domain/#comment-5984689</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Cybersquatting???? You should be ashamed Kristen for even using the term. Not even close.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">wonderer</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2007 20:14:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Domain Owner of OpenSocial.com Cybersquatting?</title><link>http://mashable.com/2007/11/06/opensocial-domain/#comment-5984688</link><description>&lt;p&gt;So I imagine this is somehow going to end up in court?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jeffro2pt0</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2007 19:47:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Domain Owner of OpenSocial.com Cybersquatting?</title><link>http://mashable.com/2007/11/06/opensocial-domain/#comment-5984687</link><description>&lt;p&gt;How is this cyber squatting at *all*?  That's a pretty sensationalist headline... I think you should google the term, Kristen.  ;)  You didn't touch on cyber squatting at all...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">James Thomas</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2007 19:04:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Domain Owner of OpenSocial.com Cybersquatting?</title><link>http://mashable.com/2007/11/06/opensocial-domain/#comment-5984686</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Bad for Google, his luck. I wouldn't sell. I wonder how much his traffic has increased on the domain.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Thilo</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2007 18:31:39 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>