It's an interesting concept, though not one I'll visit many times.
rating a persons twitterability requires more input than a 'latest tweet' and an avatar. Fun for once..... (oh, twice, want to know my rating some time from now...)
Willem Kossen
· 11 months ago
sorry I shocked you...
Willem Kossen
· 11 months ago
And I tried to hide behind my santa-hat..... I hope you'll recover quickly!
Agile Cyborg
· 11 months ago
The web has mainstreamed itself into a high school cabal. I am never interested in artificially stemming the questionable (to me) beauty of mass participation but as this thing chugs along is this the future of collective webbing? Back to the damn dichotomy, it appears. On or off. 1 or 0. Yes or no. Black or white.
I DO like some granularity, world.
Tony
· 11 months ago
So there's the twitter.grader for assessing your twitability and twit or fit for a nice scathing assessment of your avatar. Though, a lot of people I know that are good looking also happen to be complete twits... so not sure about twitdom necessarily meaning ugdom
Steve
· 11 months ago
Yes looks interesting but I like the last poster dont feel comfortable handing out my twitter credentials to all these third party sites
All Comments
rating a persons twitterability requires more input than a 'latest tweet' and an avatar. Fun for once..... (oh, twice, want to know my rating some time from now...)
I DO like some granularity, world.
Steve
grindvision.com
Why use Match.com when there's the Twatch. Or would it be Twach? Someone told me Twach = "Twitter Coach" but I would think that was Twoach.
There's Mashable's next TOP LIST, TOP 50 Twitter Word Mashups.
http://mashable.com/2008/11/15/twitterspeak/