<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Mashable - The Social Media Guide - Latest Comments in When Contextual Advertising Goes Horribly Wrong</title><link>http://mashable.disqus.com/</link><description>Internet and Technology News - Mashable is the world’s largest blog focused exclusively on Web 2.0 and Social Networking news. With more than 5 million monthly pageviews, Mashable is the most prolific blog reviewing new Web sites and services, publishing breaking news on what’s new on the web.</description><atom:link href="https://mashable.disqus.com/thread_57571/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 09:49:26 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: When Contextual Advertising Goes Horribly Wrong</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/06/19/contextual-advertising/#comment-6007735</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Why doesn't everyone use Firefox with AdBlock Plus... I haven't seen an ad on the internet in years, and there's no reason anyone should.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/1865" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/1865"&gt;https://addons.mozilla.org/...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Franx</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 09:49:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: When Contextual Advertising Goes Horribly Wrong</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/06/19/contextual-advertising/#comment-6007734</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Whether intentional (I doubt it) or not, it is rather funny.  Let's lighten up people!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">dee</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2008 22:54:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: When Contextual Advertising Goes Horribly Wrong</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/06/19/contextual-advertising/#comment-6007733</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Here is another horrible expample.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://foundbypat.blogspot.com/2008/06/terrible-ad-placement-meet-single.html" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://foundbypat.blogspot.com/2008/06/terrible-ad-placement-meet-single.html"&gt;http://foundbypat.blogspot....&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Pat Lathrop</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2008 14:25:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: When Contextual Advertising Goes Horribly Wrong</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/06/19/contextual-advertising/#comment-6007732</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Adam - check on the article, the sixth feet are a hoax. Turns out that the "severed feet" weren't human, but animal.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">TDavid</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 20:26:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: When Contextual Advertising Goes Horribly Wrong</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/06/19/contextual-advertising/#comment-6007731</link><description>&lt;p&gt;haha that made me laugh out loud&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Adam Ostrow</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 19:24:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: When Contextual Advertising Goes Horribly Wrong</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/06/19/contextual-advertising/#comment-6007730</link><description>&lt;p&gt;GaaDang! here's the working link thats not cut off:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://blog.firstlightera.com/post/Editorial-vs-Keywords.aspx" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://blog.firstlightera.com/post/Editorial-vs-Keywords.aspx"&gt;http://blog.firstlightera.c...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Philip Cockrell</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 19:22:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: When Contextual Advertising Goes Horribly Wrong</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/06/19/contextual-advertising/#comment-6007728</link><description>&lt;p&gt;definitely ... that, I think, is why brand advertising like FM sells is a much better model for everyone involved&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Adam Ostrow</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 19:06:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: When Contextual Advertising Goes Horribly Wrong</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/06/19/contextual-advertising/#comment-6007727</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The advertiser in this case, if this is proven to be a contextual link, is as much at fault as the publication here. This is one of the main failings of the contextual advertising realm, advertisers - rather than focusing on the PEOPLE who will be interested - focus too much on the WORDS that are related to them. Such a strategy doesn't take into account the target market and is essentially sea trawling as opposed to spear fishing.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I caught another good blog the other day about this, and then wrote my own post here: &lt;a href="http://blog.firstlightera.com/post/Editorial-vs-Keywords.as" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://blog.firstlightera.com/post/Editorial-vs-Keywords.as"&gt;http://blog.firstlightera.c...&lt;/a&gt; which aims to provide some solutions about how to avoid innappropriate advertising like this. To me, it all relies on the advertiser being smarter about their target market, and the publications need to begin to offer solutions that allow advertisers to focus more on their target market.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Philip Cockrell</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 18:58:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: When Contextual Advertising Goes Horribly Wrong</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/06/19/contextual-advertising/#comment-6007726</link><description>&lt;p&gt;lol that is horrible, yet hilarious&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Adam Ostrow</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 17:28:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: When Contextual Advertising Goes Horribly Wrong</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/06/19/contextual-advertising/#comment-6007724</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I once had a screenshot of a similiar occassion from a local news site. The article was about a kiddy porn case. The ad was "Want to see more pictures of your children?" (or something to that effect).&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">psupachic</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 16:04:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: When Contextual Advertising Goes Horribly Wrong</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/06/19/contextual-advertising/#comment-6007723</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Well, of course CNN didn't choose to put the ad there. It was a little bit of coincidence, but mostly an illustration of how dumb contextual ad programming is. The idea is that if it's an article about cars and gas mileage, an ad for a Hybrid vehicle shows, assuming that if the viewer is interested in cars and gas mileage you're catching them at just the right time with your car ad.&lt;br&gt;Of course that same ad is likely to show when the headline reads "Youth Steals Mothers Car After Lighting Her on Fire with Gasoline" and the content bears out the details.&lt;br&gt;Contextual ads are a great idea, unfortunately they are often poorly executed due to the limit of programming. You'd be better off knowing a human chose your ad to go along with the article. Of course, no one wants to have their ad shown in an article about severed feet.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Michael</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 16:02:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: When Contextual Advertising Goes Horribly Wrong</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/06/19/contextual-advertising/#comment-6007722</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I'll never forget the time my husband forwarded me an article about a 12 year old boy who committed suicide over a video game and Gmail's adsense came up with "Find 12 year old boys on eBay!"&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I WISH I'd taken a screen shot. I could kick myself.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">calinazaret</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 15:33:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: When Contextual Advertising Goes Horribly Wrong</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/06/19/contextual-advertising/#comment-6007721</link><description>&lt;p&gt;seems unlikely it's just coincidence, but I imagine it's possible&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Adam Ostrow</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 14:29:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: When Contextual Advertising Goes Horribly Wrong</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/06/19/contextual-advertising/#comment-6007720</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Are you sure it's not just an unfortunate coincidence with a run of network ad? I've seen similar such things on a site I work on and the ads involved were not contextually targeted.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Amy</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 14:27:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: When Contextual Advertising Goes Horribly Wrong</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/06/19/contextual-advertising/#comment-6007719</link><description>&lt;p&gt;good point, I didn't notice that ad too ... probably increases the likelihood that this actually displayed on CNN&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Adam Ostrow</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 14:25:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: When Contextual Advertising Goes Horribly Wrong</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/06/19/contextual-advertising/#comment-6007718</link><description>&lt;p&gt;haha..burn baby burn?&lt;br&gt;ok I'm sry :P&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">steve</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 14:21:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: When Contextual Advertising Goes Horribly Wrong</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/06/19/contextual-advertising/#comment-6007717</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The other ad visible in the first screenshot wasn't a whole lot better. "Looking for a real travel deal?" with binoculars directed on the graphic for a story coming from faraway (for many readers of that page) British Columbia. Creepy tourism?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">@biblinski</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 14:18:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: When Contextual Advertising Goes Horribly Wrong</title><link>http://mashable.com/2008/06/19/contextual-advertising/#comment-6007716</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I tend to look poorly on the site publishing the ad rather than on the company paying for it - presumably PutYourFeetUp didn't specifically ask to be included here, and I see it as CNN's job to avoid this kind of blunder.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Of course, this doesn't answer the bigger question of whether budgets would be better spent elsewhere. In my experience with Needish, banner ads aren't hugely successful, but perhaps the perfect banner could generate a lot of interest.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Emily Williams</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 13:31:07 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>