<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Mashable - The Social Media Guide - Latest Comments in Inkling &amp;#8211; The Wisdom of Crowds Returns</title><link>http://mashable.disqus.com/</link><description>Internet and Technology News - Mashable is the world’s largest blog focused exclusively on Web 2.0 and Social Networking news. With more than 5 million monthly pageviews, Mashable is the most prolific blog reviewing new Web sites and services, publishing breaking news on what’s new on the web.</description><atom:link href="https://mashable.disqus.com/thread_568/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 Mar 2006 11:10:58 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Inkling &amp;#8211; The Wisdom of Crowds Returns</title><link>http://mashable.com/2006/03/08/inkling-the-wisdom-of-crowds-returns/#comment-5891080</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Emile,&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Interesting -  I hadn't seen that report.  Thanks for the heads up!  I'm a big fan of NewsFutures - I'd be interested to talk to you sometime over Skype, Google Talk, IM or whatever.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Pete Cashmore</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 20 Mar 2006 11:10:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Inkling &amp;#8211; The Wisdom of Crowds Returns</title><link>http://mashable.com/2006/03/08/inkling-the-wisdom-of-crowds-returns/#comment-5891079</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Pete,&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;On your comment that "people just arenâ€™t as motivated to vote (or vote in the right way) when the currency isnâ€™t real." The data shows that this is simply not the case. Play-money prediction markets like HSX and NewsFutures have repeatedly been proven exactly as accurate, if not more, than real-money markets like Tradesports. This is not theory, it is actual published peer-reviewed data from real-world experiments. See for instance this article published in the journal "Electronic Markets": &lt;a href="http://www.newsfutures.com/pdf/Does_money_matter.pdf" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.newsfutures.com/pdf/Does_money_matter.pdf"&gt;http://www.newsfutures.com/...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Emile Servan-Schreiber</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 20 Mar 2006 04:16:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Inkling &amp;#8211; The Wisdom of Crowds Returns</title><link>http://mashable.com/2006/03/08/inkling-the-wisdom-of-crowds-returns/#comment-5891077</link><description>&lt;p&gt;We'd love to get your thoughts on CrowdIQ @ &lt;a href="http://www.crowdiq.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="www.crowdiq.com"&gt;www.crowdiq.com&lt;/a&gt;. We're just starting out and we're trying to approach Decision Markets from a community perpsective like eBay.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Hopefully your feedback can get our trading community up and running.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">CrowdIQ Team</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 13 Mar 2006 10:57:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Inkling &amp;#8211; The Wisdom of Crowds Returns</title><link>http://mashable.com/2006/03/08/inkling-the-wisdom-of-crowds-returns/#comment-5891076</link><description>&lt;p&gt;David,&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Sure - peer production is too fascinating *not* to talk about it.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Pete Cashmore</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 09 Mar 2006 20:20:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Inkling &amp;#8211; The Wisdom of Crowds Returns</title><link>http://mashable.com/2006/03/08/inkling-the-wisdom-of-crowds-returns/#comment-5891075</link><description>&lt;p&gt;RE: "(far more interesting, in fact, than the non-social web applications that increasingly fall under the Web 2.0 umbrella)"&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;AGREED -&amp;gt; actually, the companies that dont integrate their user into their product won't survive the web's next phase&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;As to decision markets - this approach WILL NOT WORK - the stock exchange is already a decision market - when you build a decision market of a decision market, you need to take a different approach - we should discuss this sometime pete - I think there's real opportunity for a different angle on solving this problem&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;d&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">David G</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 09 Mar 2006 20:17:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Inkling &amp;#8211; The Wisdom of Crowds Returns</title><link>http://mashable.com/2006/03/08/inkling-the-wisdom-of-crowds-returns/#comment-5891074</link><description>&lt;p&gt;(far more interesting, in fact, than the non-social web applications that increasingly fall under the Web 2.0 umbrella)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;AGREED -&amp;gt; actually, the companies that dont integrate their user into their product won't survive the web's next phase&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">David G</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 09 Mar 2006 20:11:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Inkling &amp;#8211; The Wisdom of Crowds Returns</title><link>http://mashable.com/2006/03/08/inkling-the-wisdom-of-crowds-returns/#comment-5891073</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hey, I know you're a writely fan...what do you think of this:&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2006/03/writely-so.html" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2006/03/writely-so.html"&gt;http://googleblog.blogspot....&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Daniel Talsky</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 09 Mar 2006 15:35:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Inkling &amp;#8211; The Wisdom of Crowds Returns</title><link>http://mashable.com/2006/03/08/inkling-the-wisdom-of-crowds-returns/#comment-5891072</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Brian,&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Futures and other types of options have many features that make them different from a normal "binary" bet on the future outcome on an event.  I can't go into the history of futures trading in a blog comment, but I can give one concrete example that might explain why someone would want to buy an option/futures contract rather than just place a bet.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The biggest difference between a futures contract and an outright bet is that a trader in futures normally doesn't hold the investment until "exercise" - that is, when the event happens.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Say that I buy a futures contract on a basketball game that will take place two months from now.  I put down $500 that Team A will beat Team B by more than 7 points.  A month passes, and in that month Team A has been playing poorly, and it looks far less likely that they will beat Team B by more than 7 points (i.e.  that I won't cover the spread).  However, Team A is still the better team, and there's still a real chance that they will, in fact, beat Team B by more than 7 points. But I don't want to wait around to see if that happens, because if it doesn't, I lose my whole $500.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;So, I turn to another trader and say "I'll sell you my futures contract - Team A over B by 7, for $250".  Now, I have $250 of my $500 back, and I'm no longer involved in the bet.  The other trader (that bought the contract from me) is happy because he is willing to take the chance that Team A will cover the spread, especially if he gets to bet $500 on that outcome and only pay $250 for it.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;It's a bit more complicated than this in practice, but this is the general idea - on a futures contract you don't normally have a binary result (win/lose).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Note: I've never traded sports futures, but I used to be an investment banker and I traded futures on other things. After taking a quick look at sports futures, they seem to follow the same model.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jack DeNeut</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 09 Mar 2006 08:26:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Inkling &amp;#8211; The Wisdom of Crowds Returns</title><link>http://mashable.com/2006/03/08/inkling-the-wisdom-of-crowds-returns/#comment-5891071</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Ivan,&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Exactly.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;--&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Brian,&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I'm not sure about their biz model, but I seem to remember reading that they might make versions for the enterprise.  I guess that means internal prediction markets, but I can't confirm.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Pete Cashmore</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 09 Mar 2006 07:50:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Inkling &amp;#8211; The Wisdom of Crowds Returns</title><link>http://mashable.com/2006/03/08/inkling-the-wisdom-of-crowds-returns/#comment-5891070</link><description>&lt;p&gt;One thing I would say about Inkling - the markets are created by the management. That's so Web 1.0. What about the Edge markets? &lt;br&gt;Enron jail time? Price of oil? Basketball coaches? I don't think so. They need to let the users create their own markets. Then you'd have millions of micro/localised markets. &lt;br&gt;Can't see it catching on at the moment.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ivan Pope</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 09 Mar 2006 07:42:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Inkling &amp;#8211; The Wisdom of Crowds Returns</title><link>http://mashable.com/2006/03/08/inkling-the-wisdom-of-crowds-returns/#comment-5891069</link><description>&lt;p&gt;ok can someone clarify this for me. on tradesports, you buy futures in stuff, and sell it right? so how is that "better" than just betting that the Lakers will win on an online sportsbook?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;and is inkling there to make $? or just make money from google ads?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Brian Breslin</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 08 Mar 2006 23:37:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Inkling &amp;#8211; The Wisdom of Crowds Returns</title><link>http://mashable.com/2006/03/08/inkling-the-wisdom-of-crowds-returns/#comment-5891068</link><description>&lt;p&gt;you want to buy stock in a Web 2.0 company? i saw that Foldera has shares trading on the OTC.  the company is alot more than just web 2.0.  it's been in the works for years and looks to be a real product.  it was down a little today, so i might buy some.  i like the reviews.  or is this a little too real for you? real money. thanks&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">steve</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 08 Mar 2006 23:04:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Inkling &amp;#8211; The Wisdom of Crowds Returns</title><link>http://mashable.com/2006/03/08/inkling-the-wisdom-of-crowds-returns/#comment-5891067</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Aren't these all just prettied up versions of the Foresight Exchange (&lt;a href="http://www.ideafutures.com/)" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.ideafutures.com/)"&gt;http://www.ideafutures.com/)&lt;/a&gt;, which has been around for years? I'm not knocking them--I have always found this sort of fantasy futures market stuff facinating--but it's certainly nothing new.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;(Note: I'm writing this without having seen Inkling, which seems to be down at the moment.)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Josh</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 08 Mar 2006 22:21:02 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>